RATIONALE: Mitochondrial Ca(2+) uptake is essential for the bioenergetic feedback response through stimulation of Krebs cycle dehydrogenases. Close association of mitochondria to the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) may explain efficient mitochondrial Ca(2+) uptake despite low Ca(2+) affinity of the mitochondrial Ca(2+) uniporter. However, the existence of such mitochondrial Ca(2+) microdomains and their functional role are presently unresolved. Mitofusin (Mfn) 1 and 2 mediate mitochondrial outer membrane fusion, whereas Mfn2 but not Mfn1 tethers endoplasmic reticulum to mitochondria in noncardiac cells. OBJECTIVE: To elucidate roles for Mfn1 and 2 in SR-mitochondrial tethering, Ca(2+) signaling, and bioenergetic regulation in cardiac myocytes. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fruit fly heart tubes deficient of the Drosophila Mfn ortholog MARF had increased contraction-associated and caffeine-sensitive Ca(2+) release, suggesting a role for Mfn in SR Ca(2+) handling. Whereas cardiac-specific Mfn1 ablation had no effects on murine heart function or Ca(2+) cycling, Mfn2 deficiency decreased cardiomyocyte SR-mitochondrial contact length by 30% and reduced the content of SR-associated proteins in mitochondria-associated membranes. This was associated with decreased mitochondrial Ca(2+) uptake (despite unchanged mitochondrial membrane potential) but increased steady-state and caffeine-induced SR Ca(2+) release. Accordingly, Ca(2+)-induced stimulation of Krebs cycle dehydrogenases during β-adrenergic stimulation was hampered in Mfn2-KO but not Mfn1-KO myocytes, evidenced by oxidation of the redox states of NAD(P)H/NAD(P)(+) and FADH(2)/FAD. CONCLUSIONS: Physical tethering of SR and mitochondria via Mfn2 is essential for normal interorganelle Ca(2+) signaling in the myocardium, consistent with a requirement for SR-mitochondrial Ca(2+) signaling through microdomains in the cardiomyocyte bioenergetic feedback response to physiological stress.
RATIONALE: Mitochondrial Ca(2+) uptake is essential for the bioenergetic feedback response through stimulation of Krebs cycle dehydrogenases. Close association of mitochondria to the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) may explain efficient mitochondrial Ca(2+) uptake despite low Ca(2+) affinity of the mitochondrial Ca(2+) uniporter. However, the existence of such mitochondrial Ca(2+) microdomains and their functional role are presently unresolved. Mitofusin (Mfn) 1 and 2 mediate mitochondrial outer membrane fusion, whereas Mfn2 but not Mfn1 tethers endoplasmic reticulum to mitochondria in noncardiac cells. OBJECTIVE: To elucidate roles for Mfn1 and 2 in SR-mitochondrial tethering, Ca(2+) signaling, and bioenergetic regulation in cardiac myocytes. METHODS AND RESULTS:Fruit flyheart tubes deficient of the DrosophilaMfn ortholog MARF had increased contraction-associated and caffeine-sensitive Ca(2+) release, suggesting a role for Mfn in SR Ca(2+) handling. Whereas cardiac-specific Mfn1 ablation had no effects on murine heart function or Ca(2+) cycling, Mfn2 deficiency decreased cardiomyocyte SR-mitochondrial contact length by 30% and reduced the content of SR-associated proteins in mitochondria-associated membranes. This was associated with decreased mitochondrial Ca(2+) uptake (despite unchanged mitochondrial membrane potential) but increased steady-state and caffeine-induced SR Ca(2+) release. Accordingly, Ca(2+)-induced stimulation of Krebs cycle dehydrogenases during β-adrenergic stimulation was hampered in Mfn2-KO but not Mfn1-KO myocytes, evidenced by oxidation of the redox states of NAD(P)H/NAD(P)(+) and FADH(2)/FAD. CONCLUSIONS: Physical tethering of SR and mitochondria via Mfn2 is essential for normal interorganelle Ca(2+) signaling in the myocardium, consistent with a requirement for SR-mitochondrial Ca(2+) signaling through microdomains in the cardiomyocyte bioenergetic feedback response to physiological stress.
Authors: Simona Boncompagni; Ann E Rossi; Massimo Micaroni; Galina V Beznoussenko; Roman S Polishchuk; Robert T Dirksen; Feliciano Protasi Journal: Mol Biol Cell Date: 2008-11-26 Impact factor: 4.138
Authors: Camila Lopez-Crisosto; Christian Pennanen; Cesar Vasquez-Trincado; Pablo E Morales; Roberto Bravo-Sagua; Andrew F G Quest; Mario Chiong; Sergio Lavandero Journal: Nat Rev Cardiol Date: 2017-03-09 Impact factor: 32.419
Authors: Deborah Naon; Marta Zaninello; Marta Giacomello; Tatiana Varanita; Francesca Grespi; Sowmya Lakshminaranayan; Annalisa Serafini; Martina Semenzato; Stephanie Herkenne; Maria Isabel Hernández-Alvarez; Antonio Zorzano; Diego De Stefani; Gerald W Dorn; Luca Scorrano Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2017-03-13 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Hans Erik Bøtker; Derek Hausenloy; Ioanna Andreadou; Salvatore Antonucci; Kerstin Boengler; Sean M Davidson; Soni Deshwal; Yvan Devaux; Fabio Di Lisa; Moises Di Sante; Panagiotis Efentakis; Saveria Femminò; David García-Dorado; Zoltán Giricz; Borja Ibanez; Efstathios Iliodromitis; Nina Kaludercic; Petra Kleinbongard; Markus Neuhäuser; Michel Ovize; Pasquale Pagliaro; Michael Rahbek-Schmidt; Marisol Ruiz-Meana; Klaus-Dieter Schlüter; Rainer Schulz; Andreas Skyschally; Catherine Wilder; Derek M Yellon; Peter Ferdinandy; Gerd Heusch Journal: Basic Res Cardiol Date: 2018-08-17 Impact factor: 17.165
Authors: Michael J Bround; Rich Wambolt; Haoning Cen; Parisa Asghari; Razvan F Albu; Jun Han; Donald McAfee; Marc Pourrier; Nichollas E Scott; Lubos Bohunek; Jerzy E Kulpa; S R Wayne Chen; David Fedida; Roger W Brownsey; Christoph H Borchers; Leonard J Foster; Thibault Mayor; Edwin D W Moore; Michael F Allard; James D Johnson Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2016-09-12 Impact factor: 5.157