Literature DB >> 22776809

Speech perception and production in children with inner ear malformations after cochlear implantation.

Dimitrios Rachovitsas1, George Psillas, Vasiliki Chatzigiannakidou, Stefanos Triaridis, Jiannis Constantinidis, Victor Vital.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the speech perception and speech intelligibility outcome after cochlear implantation in children with malformed inner ear and to compare them with a group of congenitally deaf children implantees without inner ear malformation.
METHODS: Six deaf children (five boys and one girl) with inner ear malformations who were implanted and followed in our clinic were included. These children were matched with six implanted children with normal cochlea for age at implantation and duration of cochlear implant use. All subjects were tested with the internationally used battery tests of listening progress profile (LiP), capacity of auditory performance (CAP), and speech intelligibility rating (SIR). A closed and open set word perception test adapted to the Modern Greek language was also used. In the dysplastic group, two children suffered from CHARGE syndrome, another two from mental retardation, and two children grew up in bilingual homes.
RESULTS: At least two years after switch-on, the dysplastic group scored mean LiP 62%, CAP 3.8, SIR 2.1, closed-set 61%, and open-set 49%. The children without inner ear dysplasia achieved significantly better scores, except for CAP which this difference was marginally statistically significant (p=0.009 for LiP, p=0.080 for CAP, p=0.041 for SIR, p=0.011 for closed-set, and p=0.006 for open-set tests).
CONCLUSION: All of the implanted children with malformed inner ear showed benefit of auditory perception and speech production. However, the children with inner ear malformation performed less well compared with the children without inner ear dysplasia. This was possibly due to the high proportion of disabilities detected in the dysplastic group, such as CHARGE syndrome and mental retardation. Bilingualism could also be considered as a factor which possibly affects the outcome of implanted children. Therefore, children with malformed inner ear should be preoperatively evaluated for cognitive and developmental delay. In this case, counseling for the parents is mandatory in order to explain the possible impact of the diagnosed disabilities on performance and habilitation.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22776809     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2012.06.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0165-5876            Impact factor:   1.675


  8 in total

1.  Cochlear implantation in patients with inner ear bone malformations with posterior labyrinth involvement: an exploratory study.

Authors:  Juan Miguel Palomeque Vera; María Platero Sánchez-Escribano; Javier Gómez Hervás; María Fernández Prada; Amanda Rocío González Ramírez; Manuel Sainz Quevedo
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Outcome of cochlear implantation in children with cochlear malformation [corrected].

Authors:  Dimitrios Rachovitsas; George Psillas; Stefanos Triaridis; Victor Vital; Jiannis Constantinidis
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  The Use of Lexical Neighborhood Test (LNT) in the Assessment of Speech Recognition Performance of Cochlear Implantees with Normal and Malformed Cochlea.

Authors:  Anjali R Kant; Arun A Banik
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-05-02

4.  Auditory Performance in Early Implanted Children with Cochleovestibular Malformation and Cochlear Nerve Deficiency.

Authors:  Iylia Ajmal Othman; Asma Abdullah; Goh Bee See; Cila Umat; Richard S Tyler
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.017

5.  Systematic review of cochlear implantation in patients with inner ear malformations.

Authors:  Sunny Shah; Rameen Walters; Jake Langlie; Camron Davies; Ariel Finberg; Maria-Pia Tuset; Dario Ebode; Rahul Mittal; Adrien A Eshraghi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-21       Impact factor: 3.752

6.  Assessing the Benefit-Risk Profile for Pediatric Implantable Auditory Prostheses.

Authors:  Laurel M Fisher; Amy S Martinez; Frances J Richmond; Mark D Krieger; Eric P Wilkinson; Laurie S Eisenberg
Journal:  Ther Innov Regul Sci       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 1.778

7.  Outcomes of cochlear implantation in children with and without inner ear malformations.

Authors:  Mustafa Celik; Erkan Karatas; Muzaffer Kanlikama
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2018 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.088

8.  Cornelia De Lange Syndrome and Cochlear Implantation.

Authors:  George Psillas; Stefanos Triaridis; Vasiliki Chatzigiannakidou; Jiannis Constantinidis
Journal:  Iran J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-11
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.