BACKGROUND: Collagen fiber re-alignment and uncrimping are two postulated mechanisms of tendon structural response to load. Recent studies have examined structural changes in response to mechanical testing in a postnatal development mouse supraspinatus tendon model (SST), however, those changes in the mature mouse have not been characterized. The objective of this study was to characterize collagen fiber re-alignment and crimp behavior throughout mechanical testing in a mature mouse SST. METHOD OF APPROACH: A tensile mechanical testing set-up integrated with a polarized light system was utilized for alignment and mechanical analysis. Local collagen fiber crimp frequency was quantified immediately following the designated loading protocol using a traditional tensile set up and a flash-freezing method. The effect of number of preconditioning cycles on collagen fiber re-alignment, crimp frequency and mechanical properties in midsubstance and insertion site locations were examined. RESULTS: Decreases in collagen fiber crimp frequency were identified at the toe-region of the mechanical test at both locations. The insertion site re-aligned throughout the entire test, while the midsubstance re-aligned during preconditioning and the test's linear-region. The insertion site demonstrated a more disorganized collagen fiber distribution, lower mechanical properties and a higher cross-sectional area compared to the midsubstance location. CONCLUSIONS: Local collagen fiber re-alignment, crimp behavior and mechanical properties were characterized in a mature mouse SST model. The insertion site and midsubstance respond differently to mechanical load and have different mechanisms of structural response. Additionally, results support that collagen fiber crimp is a physiologic phenomenon that may explain the mechanical test toe-region.
BACKGROUND: Collagen fiber re-alignment and uncrimping are two postulated mechanisms of tendon structural response to load. Recent studies have examined structural changes in response to mechanical testing in a postnatal development mouse supraspinatus tendon model (SST), however, those changes in the mature mouse have not been characterized. The objective of this study was to characterize collagen fiber re-alignment and crimp behavior throughout mechanical testing in a mature mouse SST. METHOD OF APPROACH: A tensile mechanical testing set-up integrated with a polarized light system was utilized for alignment and mechanical analysis. Local collagen fiber crimp frequency was quantified immediately following the designated loading protocol using a traditional tensile set up and a flash-freezing method. The effect of number of preconditioning cycles on collagen fiber re-alignment, crimp frequency and mechanical properties in midsubstance and insertion site locations were examined. RESULTS: Decreases in collagen fiber crimp frequency were identified at the toe-region of the mechanical test at both locations. The insertion site re-aligned throughout the entire test, while the midsubstance re-aligned during preconditioning and the test's linear-region. The insertion site demonstrated a more disorganized collagen fiber distribution, lower mechanical properties and a higher cross-sectional area compared to the midsubstance location. CONCLUSIONS: Local collagen fiber re-alignment, crimp behavior and mechanical properties were characterized in a mature mouse SST model. The insertion site and midsubstance respond differently to mechanical load and have different mechanisms of structural response. Additionally, results support that collagen fiber crimp is a physiologic phenomenon that may explain the mechanical test toe-region.
Authors: Stavros Thomopoulos; Gerald R Williams; Jonathan A Gimbel; Michele Favata; Louis J Soslowsky Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: Kristin S Miller; Brianne K Connizzo; Elizabeth Feeney; Jennica J Tucker; Louis J Soslowsky Journal: J Biomech Eng Date: 2012-04 Impact factor: 2.097
Authors: Cathryn D Peltz; Joseph J Sarver; Leann M Dourte; Carola C Würgler-Hauri; Gerald R Williams; Louis J Soslowsky Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: Alix C Deymier; Yiran An; John J Boyle; Andrea G Schwartz; Victor Birman; Guy M Genin; Stavros Thomopoulos; Asa H Barber Journal: Acta Biomater Date: 2017-01-11 Impact factor: 8.947
Authors: Brianne K Connizzo; Benjamin R Freedman; Joanna H Fried; Mei Sun; David E Birk; Louis J Soslowsky Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2015-04-27 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: Corinne N Riggin; Joseph J Sarver; Benjamin R Freedman; Stephen J Thomas; Louis J Soslowsky Journal: J Biomech Eng Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 2.097
Authors: Woojin M Han; Su-Jin Heo; Tristan P Driscoll; Lachlan J Smith; Robert L Mauck; Dawn M Elliott Journal: Biophys J Date: 2013-08-06 Impact factor: 4.033
Authors: Benjamin R Freedman; Nathan D Bade; Corinne N Riggin; Sijia Zhang; Philip G Haines; Katy L Ong; Paul A Janmey Journal: Biochim Biophys Acta Date: 2015-04-27
Authors: Dean Wang; Hongbo Tan; Amir H Lebaschi; Yusuke Nakagawa; Susumu Wada; Patrick E Donnelly; Liang Ying; Xiang-Hua Deng; Scott A Rodeo Journal: Arthroscopy Date: 2018-07-20 Impact factor: 4.772
Authors: Benjamin R Freedman; Joseph J Sarver; Mark R Buckley; Pramod B Voleti; Louis J Soslowsky Journal: J Biomech Date: 2013-11-11 Impact factor: 2.712