Literature DB >> 22776274

Appendiceal stump closure in children with complicated appendicitis: a prospective analysis of endoloops versus endostaples.

G Miyano1, M Urao, Gj Lane, Y Kato, T Okazaki, A Yamataka.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) can be performed safely and effectively using endoloops (EL) or endostaples (ES). We compared EL and ES for stump closure during LA for complicated appendicitis in children.
METHODS: All LA for complicated appendicitis performed between July 2005 and August 2009 were assessed prospectively. EL were used in 37 procedures and ES in 31. Apart from choice of technique which was the personal preference of the attending surgeon, all patients were managed according to the same intraoperative and postoperative protocols.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference between mean age at operation; gender ratio; mean preoperative and postoperative white blood cell; mean preoperative and postoperative white blood cell C-reactive protein; histopathology; mean operating time (EL: 71 minutes; ES: 64 minutes); mean hospitalization (EL: 5.3 days; ES: 5.1 days); febrile period (EL: 2.1 days; ES: 1.9 days); white blood cell normalization (EL: 2.6 days; ES: 2.4 days); and intravenous antibiotic usage (EL: 3.8 days; ES: 3.7 days). There were no intraoperative complications or ICU admissions in either group, but two EL cases required conversion to open surgery (P=NS). Incidences of intra-abdominal abscess (EL: n=1 or 2.7%; ES: n=1 or 3.2%), transient ileus (EL: n=2 or 5.4%; ES: n=2 or 6.4%), small bowel obstruction (EL: n=0; ES: n=0), and wound infection (EL: n=1 or 2.7%; ES: n=1 or 3.2 %) were not significantly different. Rate of rehospitalization for EL was 2.7% (n=1; colitis), and for ES, it was 3.2% (n=1; intra-abdominal abscess) (P=NS). Mean cost for EL was US$890, and for ES, it was US$1300.
CONCLUSION: This is the first prospective study comparing EL and ES during LA for complicated appendicitis in children. ES is more expensive, but there was no significant difference in morbidity for this technique, particularly with regard to incidence of postoperative intra-abdominal abscess.
© 2011 Japan Society for Endoscopic Surgery, Asia Endosurgery Task Force and Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22776274     DOI: 10.1111/j.1758-5910.2011.00091.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asian J Endosc Surg        ISSN: 1758-5902


  4 in total

1.  Endoloop versus endostapler: what is the best option for appendiceal stump closure in children with complicated appendicitis? Results of a multicentric international survey.

Authors:  Maria Escolino; Francois Becmeur; Amulya Saxena; Holger Till; George W Holcomb; Ciro Esposito
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Is the use of endoloops safe and efficient for the closure of the appendicular stump in complicated and uncomplicated acute appendicitis?

Authors:  Virginia Durán Muñoz-Cruzado; Gregorio Anguiano-Diaz; Luis Tallón Aguilar; José Tinoco González; Alejandro Sánchez Arteaga; Daniel Aparicio Sánchez; Felipe Pareja Ciuró; Javier Padillo Ruiz
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  Endoloops or endostapler use in laparoscopic appendectomy for acute uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis : No difference in infectious complications.

Authors:  Charles C van Rossem; Anna A W van Geloven; Marc H F Schreinemacher; Willem A Bemelman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Improving the value of care for appendectomy through an individual surgeon-specific approach.

Authors:  Jamie R Robinson; Nicholas H Carter; Corinne Gibson; Adam S Brinkman; Kyle Van Arendonk; Karen E Speck; Melissa E Danko; Gretchen P Jackson; Harold N Lovvorn; Martin L Blakely
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 2.545

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.