Y Tomimaru1, Y Ide, K Murata. 1. Department of Surgery, Suita Municipal Hospital, Suita, Japan.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether elderly patients with colorectal cancer benefit from laparoscopic colon surgery (LAC) in comparison to open colon surgery (OC). METHODS: Patients with colon cancer were divided into four groups; >75 years (CC(>75) ) [LAC(>75) (n=36), OC(>75) (n=15)] and ≤75 years [LAC(≤75) (n=90), OC(≤75) (n=26)]. Differences in postoperative short-term outcomes were analyzed among the age and procedure groups. RESULTS: Intraoperative blood loss was significantly less in the LAC(>75) group (68 ± 168 ml) than in the OC(>75) group (118 ± 130 ml, P=0.040). The C-reactive protein of patients in the OC(>75) group (5.4 ± 2.2 mg/dl) tended to be less than that of the LAC(>75) group (6.1 ± 2.8 mg/dl, P=0.080) on postoperative day 1. The time to the first passage of flatus was significantly shorter in the LAC(>75) group (2.0 ± 0.7 days) than in the OC(>75) group (2.7 ± 0.8 days, P=0.003). Postoperative hospital stays were also shorter in the LAC(>75) group (14.2 ± 9.4 days) than in the OC(>75) group (18.0 ± 8.3 days, P=0.038). No mortality was registered in the LAC(>75) group, while one patient in the OC(>75) group died during the postoperative course. The rate of postoperative morbidity was similar between the LAC(>75) and OC(>75) groups [13.9% (5/36) versus 20.0% (3/15), P=0.679]. CONCLUSION: LAC provides some advantages over OC in patients with colon cancer aged >75 years as well as in those aged ≤75 years. LAC can be safely performed in very elderly patients with colon cancer.
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether elderly patients with colorectal cancer benefit from laparoscopic colon surgery (LAC) in comparison to open colon surgery (OC). METHODS:Patients with colon cancer were divided into four groups; >75 years (CC(>75) ) [LAC(>75) (n=36), OC(>75) (n=15)] and ≤75 years [LAC(≤75) (n=90), OC(≤75) (n=26)]. Differences in postoperative short-term outcomes were analyzed among the age and procedure groups. RESULTS:Intraoperative blood loss was significantly less in the LAC(>75) group (68 ± 168 ml) than in the OC(>75) group (118 ± 130 ml, P=0.040). The C-reactive protein of patients in the OC(>75) group (5.4 ± 2.2 mg/dl) tended to be less than that of the LAC(>75) group (6.1 ± 2.8 mg/dl, P=0.080) on postoperative day 1. The time to the first passage of flatus was significantly shorter in the LAC(>75) group (2.0 ± 0.7 days) than in the OC(>75) group (2.7 ± 0.8 days, P=0.003). Postoperative hospital stays were also shorter in the LAC(>75) group (14.2 ± 9.4 days) than in the OC(>75) group (18.0 ± 8.3 days, P=0.038). No mortality was registered in the LAC(>75) group, while one patient in the OC(>75) group died during the postoperative course. The rate of postoperative morbidity was similar between the LAC(>75) and OC(>75) groups [13.9% (5/36) versus 20.0% (3/15), P=0.679]. CONCLUSION: LAC provides some advantages over OC in patients with colon cancer aged >75 years as well as in those aged ≤75 years. LAC can be safely performed in very elderly patients with colon cancer.