Literature DB >> 22776082

Sternotomy versus nonsternotomy LIMA-LAD grafting for single-vessel disease.

Michael E Halkos1, Thomas A Vassiliades, Richard J Myung, Patrick Kilgo, Vinod H Thourani, William A Cooper, Robert A Guyton, Omar M Lattouf, John D Puskas.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Single-vessel disease of the left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery may be surgically revascularized by left internal mammary artery (LIMA) grafting either through a sternotomy or a nonsternotomy approach. Nonsternotomy approaches are used in the hope of achieving a less invasive operation. It is unknown whether nonsternotomy approaches impact in-hospital or midterm outcomes.
METHODS: The institutional Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) database at a single US academic center was reviewed for 597 consecutive patients treated surgically for single-vessel LAD disease from January 1, 2002 to June 30, 2011. In-hospital adverse events and length of stay (LOS) were compared between patients who had LIMA-LAD grafting performed through a sternotomy (sternotomy patients) versus patients who had this procedure performed through a nonsternotomy approach (nonsternotomy patients), adjusted for propensity score (likelihood of receiving sternotomy, calculated on 33 variables). Midterm survival between groups was compared using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis by referencing the National Social Security Death Index.
RESULTS: There were 597 consecutive patients who underwent single-vessel grafting by LIMA-LAD coronary artery grafting. Of these patients, 234 underwent sternotomy, whereas 363 patients had nonsternotomy procedures: 239 patients had endoscopic LIMA harvest and left anterolateral thoracotomy, 106 patients had robot LIMA harvest and left anterolateral thoracotomy, and 18 patients had minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass. There were no strokes in the nonsternotomy group and 3 (1.3%) in the sternotomy group (p = 0.031). Thirty-day mortality, incidence of myocardial infarction, hospital LOS, and midterm survival were similar between groups. Operative time was significantly longer in the nonsternotomy group (1.8 hours, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5-2.1).
CONCLUSIONS: In this propensity-adjusted comparison, sternal-sparing incisions were associated with similar 30-day adverse events and midterm survival compared with sternotomy for single-vessel LIMA-LAD artery grafting.
Copyright © 2012 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22776082     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.05.049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  11 in total

1.  Endoscopic harvesting of the left internal mammary artery.

Authors:  Tomasz Hrapkowicz; Gianluigi Bisleri
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-07

2.  Comparing patient outcomes following minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting surgery vs. coronary artery bypass grafting: a single-center retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Lin Liang; Xiaolong Ma; Qingyu Kong; Wei Xiao; Jiaji Liu; Liqun Chi; Junming Zhu
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2022-06

3.  Comparison of early outcomes associated with coronary artery bypass grafting for multi-vessel disease conducted using minimally invasive or conventional off-pump techniques: a propensity-matched study based on SYNTAX score.

Authors:  Lin Liang; Jia-Ji Liu; Qing-Yu Kong; Bin You; Xiao-Long Ma; Li-Qun Chi; Jun-Ming Zhu
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 1.522

4.  The Utility of a 3D Endoscope and Robot-Assisted System for MIDCAB.

Authors:  Yuki Endo; Yoshitsugu Nakamura; Miho Kuroda; Yujiro Ito; Takaki Hori
Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 1.520

Review 5.  Minimally invasive and robotic coronary artery bypass grafting-a 25-year review.

Authors:  Johannes Bonatti; Stephanie Wallner; Ingo Crailsheim; Martin Grabenwöger; Bernhard Winkler
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Surgical Challenges in Multi-Vessel Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

Authors:  Jia-Ji Liu; Qing-Yu Kong; Bin You; Lin Liang; Wei Xiao; Xiao-Long Ma; Feng Pan; Li-Qun Chi
Journal:  J Interv Cardiol       Date:  2021-12-29       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 7.  All we need to know about internal thoracic artery harvesting and preparation for myocardial revascularization: a systematic review.

Authors:  Matiullah Masroor; Kang Zhou; Chunyang Chen; Xianming Fu; Yuan Zhao
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2021-12-27       Impact factor: 1.637

8.  Eleven-year outcomes of U-clips in totally robotic coronary artery bypass grafting versus standard hand-sewn running suture in robotic-assisted coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  Nan Cheng; Huajun Zhang; Ming Yang; Guopeng Liu; Yi Guo; Wenbin Kang; Changqing Gao; Rong Wang
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-06-28

9.  The midterm outcome and MACE of robotically enhanced grafting of left anterior descending artery with left internal mammary artery.

Authors:  Roberto Casula; Espeed Khoshbin; Thanos Athanasiou
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 1.637

10.  Assessment of Physical Activity by Wearable Technology During Rehabilitation After Cardiac Surgery: Explorative Prospective Monocentric Observational Cohort Study.

Authors:  Isabeau Thijs; Libera Fresiello; Wouter Oosterlinck; Peter Sinnaeve; Filip Rega
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 4.773

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.