AIMS: Laser (radiant-heat) evoked potentials (LEPs) from vertex-EEG peak-to-peak (PtP) amplitude were used to determine acute antinociceptive/antihyperalgesic efficacy of ABT-102, a novel TRPV1 antagonist efficacious in preclinical pain models, compared with active controls and placebo in normal and UV(B)-inflamed skin. METHODS: This was a randomized, placebo- and active-controlled, double-blind, intra-individual, crossover trial. Twenty-four healthy subjects received six sequences of single doses of ABT-102 (0.5, 2, 6 mg), etoricoxib 90 mg, tramadol 100 mg and placebo. Painful stimuli were induced by CO(2) -laser on normal and UV(B) -inflamed skin. LEPs and visual analogue scale (VAS-pain) ratings were taken at baseline and hourly up to 8 h post-dose from both skin types. RESULTS: Compared with placebo, significant mean decreases in the primary variable of LEP PtP-amplitude from UV(B)-inflamed skin were observed with ABT-102 6 mg (P < 0.001), ABT-102 2 mg (P = 0.002), tramadol 100 mg (P < 0.001), and etoricoxib 90 mg (P = 0.001) over the 8 h period; ABT-102 0.5 mg was similar to placebo. ABT-102 6 mg was superior to active controls over the 8 h period (P < 0.05) whereas ABT-102 2 mg was comparable. Improvements in VAS scores compared with placebo were observed with ABT-102 6 mg (P < 0.001) and ABT-102 2 mg (P = 0.002). ABT-102 average plasma concentrations were 1.3, 4.4 and 9.4 ng ml(-1) for the 0.5, 2 and 6 mg doses, respectively. There were no clinically significant safety findings. CONCLUSIONS:TRPV-1 antagonism appears promising in the management of clinical pain, but requires further investigation.
RCT Entities:
AIMS: Laser (radiant-heat) evoked potentials (LEPs) from vertex-EEG peak-to-peak (PtP) amplitude were used to determine acute antinociceptive/antihyperalgesic efficacy of ABT-102, a novel TRPV1 antagonist efficacious in preclinical pain models, compared with active controls and placebo in normal and UV(B)-inflamed skin. METHODS: This was a randomized, placebo- and active-controlled, double-blind, intra-individual, crossover trial. Twenty-four healthy subjects received six sequences of single doses of ABT-102 (0.5, 2, 6 mg), etoricoxib 90 mg, tramadol 100 mg and placebo. Painful stimuli were induced by CO(2) -laser on normal and UV(B) -inflamed skin. LEPs and visual analogue scale (VAS-pain) ratings were taken at baseline and hourly up to 8 h post-dose from both skin types. RESULTS: Compared with placebo, significant mean decreases in the primary variable of LEP PtP-amplitude from UV(B)-inflamed skin were observed with ABT-102 6 mg (P < 0.001), ABT-102 2 mg (P = 0.002), tramadol 100 mg (P < 0.001), and etoricoxib 90 mg (P = 0.001) over the 8 h period; ABT-102 0.5 mg was similar to placebo. ABT-102 6 mg was superior to active controls over the 8 h period (P < 0.05) whereas ABT-102 2 mg was comparable. Improvements in VAS scores compared with placebo were observed with ABT-102 6 mg (P < 0.001) and ABT-102 2 mg (P = 0.002). ABT-102 average plasma concentrations were 1.3, 4.4 and 9.4 ng ml(-1) for the 0.5, 2 and 6 mg doses, respectively. There were no clinically significant safety findings. CONCLUSIONS:TRPV-1 antagonism appears promising in the management of clinical pain, but requires further investigation.
Authors: J B Davis; J Gray; M J Gunthorpe; J P Hatcher; P T Davey; P Overend; M H Harries; J Latcham; C Clapham; K Atkinson; S A Hughes; K Rance; E Grau; A J Harper; P L Pugh; D C Rogers; S Bingham; A Randall; S A Sheardown Journal: Nature Date: 2000-05-11 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: M J Langman; D M Jensen; D J Watson; S E Harper; P L Zhao; H Quan; J A Bolognese; T J Simon Journal: JAMA Date: 1999-11-24 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: M J Caterina; A Leffler; A B Malmberg; W J Martin; J Trafton; K R Petersen-Zeitz; M Koltzenburg; A I Basbaum; D Julius Journal: Science Date: 2000-04-14 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Nancy G B Agrawal; Arturo G Porras; Catherine Z Matthews; Mark J Rose; Eric J Woolf; Bret J Musser; Andrea L Dynder; Katherine E Mazina; Kenneth C Lasseter; Thomas L Hunt; Jules I Schwartz; Jacqueline B McCrea; Keith M Gottesdiener Journal: J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2003-03 Impact factor: 3.126
Authors: Klaus Schaffler; Laurent B Nicolas; Andreas Borta; Tobias Brand; Peter Reitmeir; Robert Roebling; Joachim Scholpp Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2017-02-27 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: L Buntinx; T Voets; B Morlion; L Vangeel; M Janssen; E Cornelissen; J Vriens; J de Hoon; E Levtchenko Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2016-10-13 Impact factor: 4.379