OBJECTIVE: The census classification of Hispanic origin is used in epidemiological studies to group individuals, even though there is geographical, cultural, and genetic diversity within Hispanic Americans of purportedly similar backgrounds. We observed differences in our measures of adiposity between our two Mexican American populations, and examined whether these differences were attributed to social, behavioral, physiologic or genetic differences between the two populations. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In the IRAS Family Study, we examined 478 Hispanics from San Antonio, Texas and 447 Hispanics from the San Luis Valley, Colorado. Associations with body mass index (BMI), visceral adipose tissue area (VAT), and subcutaneous adipose tissue area (SAT) using social, behavioral, physiologic and genetic variables were examined. RESULTS: Hispanics of Mexican origin in our clinic population in San Antonio had significantly higher mean BMI (31.09 vs. 28.35 kg/m2), VAT (126.3 vs. 105.5 cm2), and SAT (391.6 vs. 336.9 cm2), than Hispanics of Mexican origin in the San Luis Valley. The amount of variation in adiposity explained by clinic population was 4.5% for BMI, 2.8% for VAT, and 2.7% for SAT. After adjustment, clinic population was no longer associated with VAT and SAT, but remained associated with BMI, although the amount of variation explained by population was substantially less (1.0% for BMI). CONCLUSION: Adiposity differences within this population of Mexican origin can be largely explained by social, behavioral, physiologic and genetic differences.
OBJECTIVE: The census classification of Hispanic origin is used in epidemiological studies to group individuals, even though there is geographical, cultural, and genetic diversity within Hispanic Americans of purportedly similar backgrounds. We observed differences in our measures of adiposity between our two Mexican American populations, and examined whether these differences were attributed to social, behavioral, physiologic or genetic differences between the two populations. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In the IRAS Family Study, we examined 478 Hispanics from San Antonio, Texas and 447 Hispanics from the San Luis Valley, Colorado. Associations with body mass index (BMI), visceral adipose tissue area (VAT), and subcutaneous adipose tissue area (SAT) using social, behavioral, physiologic and genetic variables were examined. RESULTS: Hispanics of Mexican origin in our clinic population in San Antonio had significantly higher mean BMI (31.09 vs. 28.35 kg/m2), VAT (126.3 vs. 105.5 cm2), and SAT (391.6 vs. 336.9 cm2), than Hispanics of Mexican origin in the San Luis Valley. The amount of variation in adiposity explained by clinic population was 4.5% for BMI, 2.8% for VAT, and 2.7% for SAT. After adjustment, clinic population was no longer associated with VAT and SAT, but remained associated with BMI, although the amount of variation explained by population was substantially less (1.0% for BMI). CONCLUSION: Adiposity differences within this population of Mexican origin can be largely explained by social, behavioral, physiologic and genetic differences.
Authors: C Bonilla; E J Parra; C L Pfaff; S Dios; J A Marshall; R F Hamman; R E Ferrell; C L Hoggart; P M McKeigue; M D Shriver Journal: Ann Hum Genet Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 1.670
Authors: Leora Henkin; Richard N Bergman; Donald W Bowden; Darrell L Ellsworth; Steven M Haffner; Carl D Langefeld; Braxton D Mitchell; Jill M Norris; Marian Rewers; Mohammed F Saad; Elizabeth Stamm; Lynne E Wagenknecht; Stephen S Rich Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: C Lorenzo; M Serrano-Rios; M T Martinez-Larrad; R Gabriel; K Williams; C Gonzalez-Villalpando; M P Stern; H P Hazuda; S M Haffner Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2001-12 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Matthew A Allison; Matthew J Budoff; Nathan D Wong; Roger S Blumenthal; Pamela J Schreiner; Michael H Criqui Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2008-02-17 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Allison A Hedley; Cynthia L Ogden; Clifford L Johnson; Margaret D Carroll; Lester R Curtin; Katherine M Flegal Journal: JAMA Date: 2004-06-16 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Matthew E Talbert; Carl D Langefeld; Julie Ziegler; Josyf C Mychaleckyj; Steven M Haffner; Jill M Norris; Donald W Bowden Journal: Hum Genet Date: 2008-12-13 Impact factor: 4.132
Authors: Corinne D Engelman; Tasha E Fingerlin; Carl D Langefeld; Pamela J Hicks; Stephen S Rich; Lynne E Wagenknecht; Donald W Bowden; Jill M Norris Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2008-07-01 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Maria R Wing; Julie Ziegler; Carl D Langefeld; Maggie C Y Ng; Steven M Haffner; Jill M Norris; Mark O Goodarzi; Donald W Bowden Journal: Hum Genet Date: 2009-03-26 Impact factor: 4.132
Authors: Matthew E Talbert; Carl D Langefeld; Julie T Ziegler; Steven M Haffner; Jill M Norris; Donald W Bowden Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2009-04-09 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Qibin Qi; Stephanie M Gogarten; Leslie S Emery; Tin Louie; Adrienne Stilp; Jianwen Cai; Neil Schneiderman; M Larissa Avilés-Santa; Robert C Kaplan; Kari E North; Cathy C Laurie; Ruth J F Loos; Carmen R Isasi Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2016-09-24 Impact factor: 5.002