OBJECTIVE: We examined the risk of depression as it relates to social support among individuals from African American, Caribbean black, and non-Hispanic White backgrounds. METHODS: 6,082 individuals participated in the national survey of American life (NSAL), a nationally representative, psychiatric epidemiological, cross-sectional survey of household populations. The survey is designed to explore racial and ethnic differences in mental disorders. NSAL survey questions were used as a proxy for social support. Logistic regression analysis was used to examine the correlates between having a DSM-IV diagnosis of major depressive disorder in the past year, demographic variables, and social support. RESULTS: African American race/ethnicity was associated with decreased odds of depression when compared to non-Hispanic whites, even when controlling for social support variables and demographics (OR = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.43-0.60). We found a three-fold increase in risk of depression among individuals who reported feeling "not very close at all" with family members compared to those who reported feeling "very close" to family (OR = 3.35, 95% CI = 1.81-6.19). CONCLUSIONS: These findings reinforce previous research documenting the important relationship between social support and depression, and perhaps should lead us to reexamine the individualistic models of treatment that are most evaluated in United States. The lack of evidence-based data on support groups, peer counseling, family therapy, or other social support interventions may reflect a majority-culture bias toward individualism, which belies the extensive body of research on social support deficits as a major risk factor for depression.
OBJECTIVE: We examined the risk of depression as it relates to social support among individuals from African American, Caribbean black, and non-Hispanic White backgrounds. METHODS: 6,082 individuals participated in the national survey of American life (NSAL), a nationally representative, psychiatric epidemiological, cross-sectional survey of household populations. The survey is designed to explore racial and ethnic differences in mental disorders. NSAL survey questions were used as a proxy for social support. Logistic regression analysis was used to examine the correlates between having a DSM-IV diagnosis of major depressive disorder in the past year, demographic variables, and social support. RESULTS: African American race/ethnicity was associated with decreased odds of depression when compared to non-Hispanic whites, even when controlling for social support variables and demographics (OR = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.43-0.60). We found a three-fold increase in risk of depression among individuals who reported feeling "not very close at all" with family members compared to those who reported feeling "very close" to family (OR = 3.35, 95% CI = 1.81-6.19). CONCLUSIONS: These findings reinforce previous research documenting the important relationship between social support and depression, and perhaps should lead us to reexamine the individualistic models of treatment that are most evaluated in United States. The lack of evidence-based data on support groups, peer counseling, family therapy, or other social support interventions may reflect a majority-culture bias toward individualism, which belies the extensive body of research on social support deficits as a major risk factor for depression.
Authors: James S Jackson; Myriam Torres; Cleopatra H Caldwell; Harold W Neighbors; Randolph M Nesse; Robert Joseph Taylor; Steven J Trierweiler; David R Williams Journal: Int J Methods Psychiatr Res Date: 2004 Impact factor: 4.035
Authors: N Frasure-Smith; F Lespérance; G Gravel; A Masson; M Juneau; M Talajic; M G Bourassa Journal: Circulation Date: 2000-04-25 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Michael P Pignone; Bradley N Gaynes; Jerry L Rushton; Catherine Mills Burchell; C Tracy Orleans; Cynthia D Mulrow; Kathleen N Lohr Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2002-05-21 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Harry S Strothers; George Rust; Patrick Minor; Edith Fresh; Benjamin Druss; David Satcher Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Linda A Travis; Jeffrey M Lyness; Cleveland G Shields; Deborah A King; Christopher Cox Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2004 May-Jun Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Chelsie E Benca-Bachman; Dalora D Najera; Keith E Whitfield; Janiece L Taylor; Roland J Thorpe; Rohan H C Palmer Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2020-02-13 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Ricky M Granderson; Gary W Harper; Ryan Wade; Wilson Odero; Daniel P Onyango Olwango; Errol L Fields Journal: Psychol Sex Orientat Gend Divers Date: 2019-05-09
Authors: Sarah E Valentine; Luana Marques; Ye Wang; Emily M Ahles; Louise Dixon De Silva; Margarita Alegría Journal: Gen Hosp Psychiatry Date: 2019-10-23 Impact factor: 3.238