Literature DB >> 22773256

Efficiency of voluntary opening hand and hook prosthetic devices: 24 years of development?

Gerwin Smit1, Raoul M Bongers, Corry K Van der Sluis, Dick H Plettenburg.   

Abstract

Quantitative data on the mechanical performance of upper-limb prostheses are very important in prostheses development and selection. The primary goal of this study was to objectively evaluate the mechanical performance of adult-size voluntary opening (VO) prosthetic terminal devices and select the best tested device. A second goal was to see whether VO devices have improved in the last two decades. Nine devices (four hooks and five hands) were quantitatively tested (Hosmer model 5XA hook, Hosmer Sierra 2 Load VO hook, RSL Steeper Carbon Gripper, Otto Bock model 10A60 hook, Becker Imperial hand, Hosmer Sierra VO hand, Hosmer Soft VO hand, RSL Steeper VO hand, Otto Bock VO hand). We measured the pinch forces, activation forces, cable displacements, mass, and opening span and calculated the work and hysteresis. We compared the results with data from 1987. Hooks required lower activation forces and delivered higher pinch forces than hands. The activation forces of several devices were very high. The pinch forces of all tested hands were too low. The Hosmer model 5XA hook with three bands was the best tested hook. The Hosmer Sierra VO hand was the best tested hand. We found no improvements in VO devices compared with the data from 1987.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22773256     DOI: 10.1682/jrrd.2011.07.0125

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev        ISSN: 0748-7711


  9 in total

1.  Mechanical evaluation of the "Hüfner hand" prosthesis.

Authors:  Gerwin Smit
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 1.895

2.  Learning to use a body-powered prosthesis: changes in functionality and kinematics.

Authors:  Laura H B Huinink; Hanneke Bouwsema; Dick H Plettenburg; Corry K van der Sluis; Raoul M Bongers
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 4.262

3.  High Cable Forces Deteriorate Pinch Force Control in Voluntary-Closing Body-Powered Prostheses.

Authors:  Mona Hichert; David A Abbink; Peter J Kyberd; Dick H Plettenburg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Case-study of a user-driven prosthetic arm design: bionic hand versus customized body-powered technology in a highly demanding work environment.

Authors:  Wolf Schweitzer; Michael J Thali; David Egger
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 4.262

5.  Design of a cosmetic glove stiffness compensation mechanism for toddler-sized hand prostheses.

Authors:  Ronald A Bos; Dick H Plettenburg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Fatigue-free operation of most body-powered prostheses not feasible for majority of users with trans-radial deficiency.

Authors:  Mona Hichert; Alistair N Vardy; Dick Plettenburg
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 1.895

7.  Comparison of DEKA Arm and Body-Powered Upper Limb Prosthesis Joint Kinematics.

Authors:  Conor Bloomer; Kimberly L Kontson
Journal:  Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl       Date:  2020-04-25

8.  Mechanical evaluation of the "Hüfner hand" prosthesis.

Authors:  Gerwin Smit
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 1.672

9.  Perception and control of low cable operation forces in voluntary closing body-powered upper-limb prostheses.

Authors:  Mona Hichert; David A Abbink; Alistair N Vardy; Corry K van der Sluis; Wim G M Janssen; Michael A H Brouwers; Dick H Plettenburg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.