PURPOSE: An inflammatory-immunological marker, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), was evaluated as a surrogate indicator for prognosis of advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients. METHODS: The subjects of this study were 199 never smokers with advanced lung adenocarcinoma, who were enrolled in a prospective randomized phase III study (First-SIGNAL) comparing gefitinib with gemcitabine plus cisplatin as first-line therapy. The values of NLR were assessed at two time points: at baseline (pretreatment) and on day 1 of the second cycle (posttreatment). RESULTS: A higher posttreatment NLR was associated with a worse tumor response (median posttreatment NLR, 1.56 for partial response, 1.64 for stable disease, and 2.70 for progressive disease; P < 0.001). The risk of progression was higher when the posttreatment NLR was higher [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.23, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.15-1.31; P < 0.001]. A high posttreatment NLR was associated with an increased risk of death (HR = 1.13, 95 % CI 1.06-1.21; P < 0.001). These associations did not differ according to treatment arms. When total patients were divided into four groups according to the cutoff points of pre- and posttreatment NLRs, those with a high pretreatment NLR that declined substantially after treatment showed improved survival compared with those with a high pretreatment NLR that remained high even after treatment (median overall survival, 22.0 and 15.8 months, respectively; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A high posttreatment NLR is associated with poor prognosis. An early reduction in the NLR after effective treatment may indicate survival improvement in the patients with poor prognosis.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: An inflammatory-immunological marker, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), was evaluated as a surrogate indicator for prognosis of advanced lung adenocarcinomapatients. METHODS: The subjects of this study were 199 never smokers with advanced lung adenocarcinoma, who were enrolled in a prospective randomized phase III study (First-SIGNAL) comparing gefitinib with gemcitabine plus cisplatin as first-line therapy. The values of NLR were assessed at two time points: at baseline (pretreatment) and on day 1 of the second cycle (posttreatment). RESULTS: A higher posttreatment NLR was associated with a worse tumor response (median posttreatment NLR, 1.56 for partial response, 1.64 for stable disease, and 2.70 for progressive disease; P < 0.001). The risk of progression was higher when the posttreatment NLR was higher [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.23, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.15-1.31; P < 0.001]. A high posttreatment NLR was associated with an increased risk of death (HR = 1.13, 95 % CI 1.06-1.21; P < 0.001). These associations did not differ according to treatment arms. When total patients were divided into four groups according to the cutoff points of pre- and posttreatment NLRs, those with a high pretreatment NLR that declined substantially after treatment showed improved survival compared with those with a high pretreatment NLR that remained high even after treatment (median overall survival, 22.0 and 15.8 months, respectively; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A high posttreatment NLR is associated with poor prognosis. An early reduction in the NLR after effective treatment may indicate survival improvement in the patients with poor prognosis.
Authors: G V Scagliotti; F De Marinis; M Rinaldi; L Crinò; C Gridelli; S Ricci; E Matano; C Boni; M Marangolo; G Failla; G Altavilla; V Adamo; A Ceribelli; M Clerici; F Di Costanzo; L Frontini; M Tonato Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2002-11-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Steven C H Kao; Nick Pavlakis; Rozelle Harvie; Janette L Vardy; Michael J Boyer; Nico van Zandwijk; Stephen J Clarke Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2010-10-18 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: P Lissoni; F Brivio; L Fumagalli; G Messina; V Ghezzi; L Frontini; L Giani; M Vaghi; A Ardizzoia; G S Gardani Journal: Int J Biol Markers Date: 2004 Apr-Jun Impact factor: 2.659
Authors: A G Pallis; S Agelaki; S Kakolyris; A Kotsakis; A Kalykaki; N Vardakis; P Papakotoulas; A Agelidou; A Geroyianni; M Agelidou; D Hatzidaki; D Mavroudis; V Georgoulias Journal: Lung Cancer Date: 2008-05-22 Impact factor: 5.705
Authors: Y Kishida; M Kawahara; S Teramukai; K Kubota; K Komuta; K Minato; T Mio; Y Fujita; T Yonei; K Nakano; M Tsuboi; K Shibata; S Atagi; T Kawaguchi; K Furuse; M Fukushima Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2009-09-29 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Michelle N Messmer; Colleen S Netherby; Debarati Banik; Scott I Abrams Journal: Cancer Immunol Immunother Date: 2014-11-29 Impact factor: 6.968
Authors: R Leibowitz-Amit; A J Templeton; A Omlin; C Pezaro; E G Atenafu; D Keizman; F Vera-Badillo; J-A Seah; G Attard; J J Knox; S S Sridhar; I F Tannock; J S de Bono; A M Joshua Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2014-01-23 Impact factor: 32.976