Literature DB >> 22772711

Intrastomal 3D ultrasound; an inter- and intra-observer evaluation.

K Strigård1, A Gurmu, P Näsvall, P Påhlman, U Gunnarsson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine intra- and interobserver reliability in 3D intrastomal ultrasound imaging of parastomal hernia and protrusion.
METHOD: A total of 40 patients were investigated. Two or three physicians evaluated the images twice, 1 month apart.
RESULTS: Inter-observer agreement was 72 % with a kappa value 0.59. For the last 10 patients there was an agreement of 80 % with a kappa value of 0.70. Intraobserver agreement was 80 % for one observer and 95 % for the other. The learning curve levelled out at around 30 patients.
CONCLUSION: Considering the learning curve of 30 patients, 3D intrastomal ultrasound is a reliable investigation method. 3D intrastomal ultrasonography has the potential to be the investigation of choice to differentiate between a bulge, a hernia, or a protrusion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22772711     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-012-1526-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  13 in total

1.  Interobserver variability in endoscopic ultrasonography: a prospective evaluation.

Authors:  L D Roubein; P Lynch; G Glober; F A Sinicrope
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 2.  Endosonography in anorectal disease: an overview.

Authors:  R J F Felt-Bersma; M Cazemier
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl       Date:  2006

3.  Interobserver and intraobserver variation of two-dimensional and three-dimensional anal endosonography in the evaluation of recurrent anal cancer.

Authors:  Anders F Christensen; Bo Nyhuus; Michael B Nielsen
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  Three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound assessment of the anal sphincters: reproducibility.

Authors:  Ingrid P Olsen; Kåre Augensen; Tom Wilsgaard; Torvid Kiserud
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.636

5.  Imaging of parastomal hernia using three-dimensional intrastomal ultrasonography.

Authors:  A Gurmu; U Gunnarsson; K Strigård
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  The inter-observer reliability is very low at clinical examination of parastomal hernia.

Authors:  Ambatchew Gurmu; Peter Matthiessen; Sven Nilsson; Lars Påhlman; Jörgen Rutegård; Ulf Gunnarsson
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Enterostomy site hernias: a clinical and computerized tomographic evaluation.

Authors:  Asim Cingi; Tebessum Cakir; Ali Sever; A Ozdemir Aktan
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Interobserver agreement in the staging of rectal cancer using endoscopic ultrasonography.

Authors:  P Burtin; A F Rabot; D Heresbach; S Carpentier; M C Rousselet; N Le Berre; J Boyer
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 10.093

9.  The prevalence of parastomal hernia after formation of an end colostomy. A new clinico-radiological classification.

Authors:  J Moreno-Matias; X Serra-Aracil; A Darnell-Martin; J Bombardo-Junca; L Mora-Lopez; M Alcantara-Moral; P Rebasa; I Ayguavives-Garnica; S Navarro-Soto
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-05-03       Impact factor: 3.788

10.  Life table analysis of stomal complications following colostomy.

Authors:  E E Londono-Schimmer; A P Leong; R K Phillips
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.585

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  European Hernia Society guidelines on prevention and treatment of parastomal hernias.

Authors:  S A Antoniou; F Agresta; J M Garcia Alamino; D Berger; F Berrevoet; H-T Brandsma; K Bury; J Conze; D Cuccurullo; U A Dietz; R H Fortelny; C Frei-Lanter; B Hansson; F Helgstrand; A Hotouras; A Jänes; L F Kroese; J R Lambrecht; I Kyle-Leinhase; M López-Cano; L Maggiori; V Mandalà; M Miserez; A Montgomery; S Morales-Conde; M Prudhomme; T Rautio; N Smart; M Śmietański; M Szczepkowski; C Stabilini; F E Muysoms
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  A comparison between intrastomal 3D ultrasonography, CT scanning and findings at surgery in patients with stomal complaints.

Authors:  P Näsvall; F Wikner; U Gunnarsson; J Rutegård; K Strigård
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Diagnostic methods in parastomal hernia; research and clinical relevance.

Authors:  J R Lambrecht
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2020-03-28       Impact factor: 4.739

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.