Literature DB >> 22772474

Ultrasonographic investigation of the effect of positive end-expiratory pressure on the cross-sectional area of the femoral vein.

J H Ryu1, S S Han, W J Choi, H Kim, S C Lee, S H Do, Y K Son.   

Abstract

Femoral veins are commonly used as a relatively safe alternative route for central venous cannulation. Several maneuvers are used to increase the cross-sectional area of the vein. In this study, we assessed the effect of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on the cross-sectional area (CSA) of femoral veins, using ultrasound in adult patients under positive pressure ventilation. All patients received a standardized induction of general anesthesia and intravenous fluid administration. Using ultrasound, the cross-sectional areas of both femoral veins were measured in 57 adult patients in the supine position without PEEP (control) and in the supine position with PEEP of 10 cm H(2)O. Mean arterial pressure and heart rate were recorded before and after the application of PEEP at 10 cm H(2)O. The application of 10 cm H(2)O PEEP significantly increased the CSA of the right femoral vein by 47.6 % and the left femoral vein by 48.4 % (each P < 0.001). Mean arterial pressure decreased by 2.6 mmHg (95 % CI 1.3-3.9; P < 0.001), whereas no significant change in heart rate was observed (P = 0.861). The CSA of the femoral vein is augmented with the application of 10 cm H(2)O PEEP in adult patients undergoing positive pressure ventilation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22772474     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-012-0089-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  17 in total

1.  Portable ultrasound for difficult central venous access.

Authors:  A Hatfield; A Bodenham
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 9.166

2.  Femoral vein cannulation during resuscitation: potential advantages.

Authors:  A A Gehani
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 5.262

Review 3.  Preventing complications of central venous catheterization.

Authors:  David C McGee; Michael K Gould
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-03-20       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Brief report: effects of positive end-expiratory pressure on internal jugular vein cross-sectional area in anesthetized adults.

Authors:  Kerry J Hollenbeck; Bryan M Vander Schuur; Matthew R Tulis; Brian W Mecklenburg; Cory P Gaconnet; Scott C Wallace; Eugenio Lujan; Ivan K Lesnik
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2010-04-12       Impact factor: 5.108

5.  Valsalva and gravitational variability of the internal jugular vein and common femoral vein: ultrasound assessment.

Authors:  P Beddy; T Geoghegan; N Ramesh; O Buckley; J O'Brien; J Colville; W C Torreggiani
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2005-12-13       Impact factor: 3.528

6.  Ultrasonographic investigation of the effect of reverse Trendelenburg on the cross-sectional area of the femoral vein.

Authors:  Michael B Stone; Daniel D Price; Bradley S Anderson
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.484

7.  US-guided puncture of the internal jugular vein: complications and anatomic considerations.

Authors:  A C Gordon; J C Saliken; D Johns; R Owen; R R Gray
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  1998 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.464

Review 8.  The preventive role of higher PEEP in treating severely hypoxemic ARDS.

Authors:  C Guerin
Journal:  Minerva Anestesiol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 9.  Femoral vein cannulation: a review.

Authors:  R H Dailey
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.484

10.  Effects of reverse Trendelenburg position and inguinal compression on femoral vein cross-sectional area in infants and young children.

Authors:  E H Suk; D H Kim; H K Kil; T D Kweon
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 6.955

View more
  1 in total

1.  Cross-sectional area of the femoral vein varies with leg position and distance from the inguinal ligament.

Authors:  Dorota Czyzewska; Andrzej Ustymowicz; Radoslaw Kowalewski; Anna Zurada; Jaroslaw Krejza
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.