Literature DB >> 22771884

Does the measurement of the difference of resistive indexes in spleen and kidney allow a selective assessment of chronic kidney injury?

Oliver S Grün1, Esther Herath, Anja Weihrauch, Franziska Flügge, Kyrill S Rogacev, Danilo Fliser, Gunnar H Heine.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether the difference of resistive indexes (RIs) in spleen and kidney (DI-RISK) is a more specific ultrasonographic (US) marker of intrarenal parenchymal damage than intrarenal RI alone.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was approved by the local ethics committee. All study participants provided informed consent. The authors defined standard values for renal RI, splenic RI, and DI-RISK in 152 healthy subjects; carotid intima media thickness (IMT) was assessed as a marker of systemic vascular disease. Next, the authors measured these US parameters and collected echocardiographic data in 290 patients with chronic kidney disease (stage 2-4) recruited between September 2008 and February 2011 to evaluate the DI-RISK across the spectrum of stages of kidney function. Correlation coefficients were calculated with the Spearman test, and multivariate linear regression was used to analyze independent predictors of renal RI, splenic RI, and DI-RISK.
RESULTS: Healthy subjects had a mean age of 34.3 years ± 8.7, and patients with chronic kidney disease had a mean age of 65.0 years ± 12.3 (P < .001). In healthy subjects, both renal and splenic RIs were associated with IMT (renal RI: r = 0.19, P = .022; splenic RI: r = 0.23, P = .005); there was no correlation between DI-RISK and IMT (r = -0.10, P = .215). Similarly, in patients with chronic kidney disease, renal and splenic RIs correlated with IMT (renal RI: r = 0.33, P < .001; splenic RI: r = 0.30, P = .001). DI-RISK was associated with the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR; r = -0.19, P = .001) but not with IMT (r = 0.08, P = .174). At multivariate regression analysis, DI-RISK was independently associated with eGFR but not with extrarenal factors.
CONCLUSION: In patients with chronic kidney disease, renal RIs do not selectively indicate organ damage, but also mirror systemic vascular disease. The authors introduced DI-RISK as a potential US marker that may more specifically reflect kidney damage. © RSNA, 2012

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22771884     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.12111533

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  9 in total

Review 1.  Renal intraparenchymal resistive index: the ultrasonographic answer to many clinical questions.

Authors:  Pierpaolo Di Nicolò; Antonio Granata
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2018-12-11       Impact factor: 3.902

2.  Imaging: refining noninvasive ultrasound evaluation of the kidneys.

Authors:  Joel F Platt
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 28.314

3.  External Validation of the Kidney Failure Risk Equation and Re-Calibration with Addition of Ultrasound Parameters.

Authors:  Claudia S Lennartz; John William Pickering; Sarah Seiler-Mußler; Lucie Bauer; Kathrin Untersteller; Insa E Emrich; Adam M Zawada; Jörg Radermacher; Navdeep Tangri; Danilo Fliser; Gunnar H Heine
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 4.  Renal Resistive Index: not only kidney.

Authors:  Pierpaolo Di Nicolò; Antonio Granata
Journal:  Clin Exp Nephrol       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 2.801

Review 5.  Kidney Ultrasound for Nephrologists: A Review.

Authors:  Rohit K Singla; Matthew Kadatz; Robert Rohling; Christopher Nguan
Journal:  Kidney Med       Date:  2022-04-07

6.  Symmetric dimethylarginine (SDMA) outperforms asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) and other methylarginines as predictor of renal and cardiovascular outcome in non-dialysis chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Insa E Emrich; Adam M Zawada; Jens Martens-Lobenhoffer; Danilo Fliser; Stefan Wagenpfeil; Gunnar H Heine; Stefanie M Bode-Böger
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 5.460

7.  Renal resistive index: a new reversible tool for the early diagnosis and evaluation of organ perfusion in critically ill patients: a case report.

Authors:  Antonio Anile; Silvia Ferrario; Lorena Campanello; Maria Antonietta Orban; Giacomo Castiglione
Journal:  Ultrasound J       Date:  2019-10-10

8.  Transcranial sonography depicts a larger substantia nigra echogenic area in renal transplant patients on calcineurin inhibitors than on rapamycin.

Authors:  Nordeval Cavalcante Araújo; José Hermógenes Rocco Suassuna; Rita de Cássia Leite Fernandes
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 2.388

9.  Difference between renal and splenic resistive index as a novel criterion in Doppler evaluation of renal artery stenosis.

Authors:  Clemens Grupp; Michael J Koziolek; Manuel Wallbach; Kerstin Hoxhold; Gerhard A Müller; Carsten Bramlage
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 3.738

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.