Literature DB >> 22771774

A new method to analyze dGEMRIC measurements in femoroacetabular impingement: preliminary validation against arthroscopic findings.

R Lattanzi1, C Petchprapa, C Glaser, K Dunham, A V Mikheev, A Krigel, T C Mamisch, Y-J Kim, H Rusinek, M Recht.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To validate a new method to analyze delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage (dGEMRIC) measurements in the hip for early assessment of cartilage defects in femoroacetabular impingement (FAI).
METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 10 hips in 10 FAI patients, who underwent hip arthroscopy. T1-weighted images and dGEMRIC T(1) maps were acquired at 1.5 T on coronal planes, including the anterior-superior, superior, posterior-superior hip cartilage. For all slices, a region of interest (ROI) was defined over the central portion of the femoral cartilage, assumed to be healthy, and T1 values (x) were transformed to standard scores (z) using z = (x -μ)/σ, where μ and σ are the average and standard deviation of T1 in the femoral ROI. Diagnostic performance of the resulting standardized dGEMRIC maps was evaluated against intraoperative findings and compared with that of a previously proposed dGEMRIC analysis as well as morphologic assessment.
RESULTS: Assuming z = -2 or z = -3 as the threshold between normal and degenerated cartilage, sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were 88%, 51% and 62%, and 71%, 63% and 65%, respectively. By using T1 = 500 ms as single threshold for all dGEMRIC T1 maps, these values became 47%, 58% and 55%, whereas they were 47%, 79% and 70% for morphologic evaluation.
CONCLUSIONS: Standardized dGEMRIC can increase the sensitivity in detecting abnormal cartilage in FAI and has the potential to improve the clinical interpretation of dGEMRIC measurements in FAI, by removing the effect of inter- and intra-patient T1 variability.
Copyright © 2012 Osteoarthritis Research Society International. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22771774     DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2012.06.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage        ISSN: 1063-4584            Impact factor:   6.576


  17 in total

Review 1.  MRI of the hip for the evaluation of femoroacetabular impingement; past, present, and future.

Authors:  Geoffrey M Riley; Emily J McWalter; Kathryn J Stevens; Marc R Safran; Riccardo Lattanzi; Garry E Gold
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2014-08-23       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  7 Tesla quantitative hip MRI: T1, T2 and T2* mapping of hip cartilage in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Andrea Lazik; Jens M Theysohn; Christina Geis; Sören Johst; Mark E Ladd; Harald H Quick; Oliver Kraff
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Quantitative MRI in the evaluation of articular cartilage health: reproducibility and variability with a focus on T2 mapping.

Authors:  Rachel K Surowiec; Erin P Lucas; Charles P Ho
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  T2*-Mapping of Acetabular Cartilage in Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement at 3 Tesla: Comparative Analysis with Arthroscopic Findings.

Authors:  Tobias Hesper; Christina Neugroda; Christoph Schleich; Gerald Antoch; Harish Hosalkar; Rüdiger Krauspe; Christoph Zilkens; Bernd Bittersohl
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Validity of direct magnetic resonance arthrogram in patients with femoroacetabular impingement and their outcome post hip arthroscopy.

Authors:  Rahul Mohan; P Nithin Unnikrishnan; Ravindra Gudena
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-11-12

6.  Labral and cartilage abnormalities in young patients with hip pain: accuracy of 3-Tesla indirect MR arthrography.

Authors:  Catherine N Petchprapa; Leon D Rybak; Kevin S Dunham; Riccardo Lattanzi; Michael P Recht
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 7.  Current knowledge and importance of dGEMRIC techniques in diagnosis of hip joint diseases.

Authors:  Christoph Zilkens; Carl Johann Tiderius; Rüdiger Krauspe; Bernd Bittersohl
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2015-04-26       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  T1ρ Hip Cartilage Mapping in Assessing Patients With Cam Morphology: How Can We Optimize the Regions of Interest?

Authors:  Helen Anwander; Kawan S Rakhra; Gerd Melkus; Paul E Beaulé
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Planar dGEMRIC Maps May Aid Imaging Assessment of Cartilage Damage in Femoroacetabular Impingement.

Authors:  Evgeny Bulat; Sarah D Bixby; Carl Siversson; Leslie A Kalish; Simon K Warfield; Young-Jo Kim
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  7 Tesla quantitative hip MRI: a comparison between TESS and CPMG for T2 mapping.

Authors:  Oliver Kraff; Andrea Lazik-Palm; Rahel Heule; Jens M Theysohn; Oliver Bieri; Harald H Quick
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 2.310

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.