Literature DB >> 22771488

Aortic valve reconstruction of unicuspid aortic valve by tricuspidization using autologous pericardium.

Isamu Kawase1, Shigeyuki Ozaki, Hiromasa Yamashita, Shin Uchida, Yukinari Nozawa, Takayoshi Matsuyama, Mikio Takatoh, So Hagiwara.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Unicuspid aortic valve is a rare anatomic variant, but patients may require intervention for severe valve dysfunction at a young age. We introduce a new reconstructive technique for diseased unicuspid valve by tricuspidization with glutaraldehyde-treated autologous pericardium.
METHODS: From April 2007 through January 2011, we performed 304 cases of aortic valve reconstruction using glutaraldehyde-treated autologous pericardium. During the same period, we encountered 9 patients with unicuspid aortic valve, including 8 male patients and 1 female patient. Mean age was 48.9±19.9 years (14-78 years). Two patients had aortic stenosis (AS), 1 had aortic regurgitation (AR), and 6 patients had both. Our original aortic valve reconstruction technique is characterized by the independent replacement of 3 leaflets with separate measurement of length between each commissure. In the case of a unicuspid aortic valve, we create a new commissure at a higher point along the raphe at the same level with the 1 normally existing commissure.
RESULTS: No early mortality or major morbidity was recorded. Postoperative echocardiography showed trivial or no AR, with the peak pressure gradients averaging 10.6±3.3 mm Hg. One-year follow-up echocardiography revealed that the peak pressure gradients averaged 8.6±3.7 mm Hg, with trivial or no AR. The mean follow-up period was 551.1±51.4 days. All 9 patients are in good condition. No reoperation or any additional intervention has been necessary.
CONCLUSIONS: Diseased unicuspid aortic valves were treated by our original aortic valve reconstruction technique with excellent early results. We continue to study the long-term results.
Copyright © 2012 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22771488     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.05.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  5 in total

Review 1.  [Surgical treatment of aortic valve stenosis].

Authors:  O J Liakopoulos; J Merkle; T Wahlers; Y-H Choi
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.443

2.  Bicuspid and unicuspid aortic valves: Different phenotypes of the same disease? Insight from the GenTAC Registry.

Authors:  Joseph M Krepp; Mary J Roman; Richard B Devereux; Adrienne Bruce; Siddharth K Prakash; Shaine A Morris; Dianna M Milewicz; Kathryn W Holmes; William Ravekes; Ralph V Shohet; Reed E Pyeritz; Cheryl L Maslen; Barbara L Kroner; Kim A Eagle; Liliana Preiss; Federico M Asch
Journal:  Congenit Heart Dis       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 2.007

Review 3.  Aortic valve neo-cuspidation using the Ozaki technique for acquired and congenital disease: where does this procedure currently stand?

Authors:  Christopher W Baird; Supreet P Marathe; Pedro J Del Nido
Journal:  Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2020-01-09

Review 4.  Current surgical strategies and techniques of aortic valve diseases in children.

Authors:  Kun Wang; Huifeng Zhang; Bing Jia
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2018-04

5.  Early and mid-term results of isolated aortic valve neocuspidization in patients with aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Yasunori Iida; Susumu Fujii; Sho Akiyama; Shigeharu Sawa
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018-07-25
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.