Literature DB >> 22771415

Longevity of repaired restorations: a practice based study.

Niek J M Opdam1, Ewald M Bronkhorst, Bas A C Loomans, Marie-Charlotte D N J M Huysmans.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The aim was to evaluate retrospectively the influence on restoration longevity of a repair and to evaluate longevity of repaired restorations.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a practice, 1202 amalgam and 747 composite resin restorations were placed. 407 restorations failed (amalgam 293, composite 114), 246 restorations were repaired with composite resin using an etch-and-rinse technique. Of repaired restorations reason for failure and number of surfaces of original restoration, repair date, and date of patients' last visit were recorded. Whenever a new treatment was necessary, this was considered failure. Data were analysed by Kaplan-Meier statistics and log-rank tests (p<0.05). A multi-variate Cox-regression analysis was conducted on results for variables number of surfaces, repair reason, and repaired material.
RESULTS: 133 amalgam restorations (57% due to fracture) and 113 composite restorations (62% due to caries) were repaired. 151 of 246 repaired restorations (61%) were still in service without further intervention after 4.8 years. The annual failure rates for repaired amalgam and composite restorations was 9.3% and 5.7% after 4 years (log-rank, p=0.001). Restorations that were repaired due to fracture had a lower survival than restorations that were repaired due to caries (log-rank, p=0.006). The Cox-regression showed influence of the gender but no significant influence of material or reason for repair, indicating that the findings are a consequence of joint negative influences of investigated variables.
CONCLUSION: The present study shows that repairs can enhance the longevity of dental restorations considerably. Moreover, repairs on restorations failing due to caries have a better prognosis compared to repairs on restorations failing due to fracture.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22771415     DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2012.06.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent        ISSN: 0300-5712            Impact factor:   4.379


  14 in total

1.  Class II composite resin restorations: faster, easier, predictable.

Authors:  R D Jackson
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 1.626

2.  Defective amalgam restorations--repair or replace?

Authors:  Ben Balevi
Journal:  Evid Based Dent       Date:  2014-06

3.  Attitudes, practice, and experience of German dentists regarding repair restorations.

Authors:  Philipp Kanzow; Robin Hoffmann; Claudia Tschammler; Jochen Kruppa; Tina Rödig; Annette Wiegand
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Attitudes of Greek dentists towards repair of conservative restorations. An online survey.

Authors:  Antoniadou Maria; Paximada Charikleia; Lagouvardos Panagiotis
Journal:  Int Dent J       Date:  2017-07-23       Impact factor: 2.607

5.  The clinical success of repaired posterior composite restorations with and without silane application.

Authors:  Muhittin Ugurlu; Fatmanur Sari
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 3.606

6.  Risk of failure of repaired versus replaced defective direct restorations in permanent teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Laura Teixeira Mendes; Djessica Pedrotti; Luciano Casagrande; Tathiane Larissa Lenzi
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 3.606

7.  Repair or replacement of restorations: A prospective cohort study by dentists in The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network.

Authors:  Valeria V Gordan; Joseph L Riley; D Brad Rindal; Vibeke Qvist; Jeffrey L Fellows; Deborah A Dilbone; Solomon G Brotman; Gregg H Gilbert
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.634

8.  A 24-month evaluation of amalgam and resin-based composite restorations: Findings from The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network.

Authors:  Michael S McCracken; Valeria V Gordan; Mark S Litaker; Ellen Funkhouser; Jeffrey L Fellows; Douglass G Shamp; Vibeke Qvist; Jeffrey S Meral; Gregg H Gilbert
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.634

Review 9.  Factors influencing repair of dental restorations with resin composite.

Authors:  Igor R Blum; Christopher D Lynch; Nairn Hf Wilson
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent       Date:  2014-10-17

10.  Effect of cariogenic challenge on the stability of dentin bonds.

Authors:  Fernanda Blos Borges; Ellen Luísa Kochhann DE Lima; Fernanda Wiengärtner Machado; Noéli Boscato; Françoise Hélène Van De Sande; Rafael Ratto de Moraes; Maximiliano Sérgio Cenci
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.698

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.