Literature DB >> 22770859

Upstream adverse effects in risk assessment: a model of polychlorinated biphenyls, thyroid hormone disruption and neurological outcomes in humans.

Amber Wise1, Fred Parham, Daniel A Axelrad, Kathryn Z Guyton, Christopher Portier, Lauren Zeise, R Thomas Zoeller, Tracey J Woodruff.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Increasing data on early biological changes from chemical exposures requires new interpretation tools to support decision-making.
OBJECTIVES: To test the possibility of applying a quantitative approach using human data linking chemical exposures and upstream biological perturbations to overt downstream outcomes.
METHODS: Using polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) exposures and maternal thyroid hormone (TH) perturbations as a case study, we model three relationships: (1) prenatal PCB exposures and TH changes, using free T(4) (FT(4)); (2) prenatal TH and childhood neurodevelopmental outcomes; and (3) prenatal PCB exposures and childhood neurodevelopmental outcomes (IQ). We surveyed the epidemiological literature; extracted relevant quantitative data; and developed models for each relationship, applying meta-analysis where appropriate.
RESULTS: For relationship 1, a meta-analysis of 3 studies gives a coefficient of -0.27 pg/mL FT(4) per ln(sum of PCBs) (95% confidence interval [CI] -0.82 to 0.27). For relationship 2, regression coefficients from three studies of maternal FT(4) levels and cognitive scores ranged between 0.99 IQ points/(pg/mL FT(4)) (95% CI -0.31 to 2.2) and 7.6 points/(pg/mL FT(4)) (95% CI 1.2 to 16.3). For relationship 3, a meta-analysis of five studies produces a coefficient of -1.98 IQ points (95% CI -4.46 to 0.50) per unit increase in ln(sum of PCBs). Combining relationships 1 and 2 yields an estimate of -2.0 to -0.27 points of IQ per unit increase in ln(sum of PCBs).
CONCLUSIONS: Combining analysis of chemical exposures and early biological perturbations (PCBs and FT(4)) with analysis of early biological perturbations and downstream overt effects (FT(4) and IQ) yields estimates within the range of studies of exposures and overt effects (PCBs and IQ). This is an example approach using upstream biological perturbations for effect prediction.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22770859     DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2012.05.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Res        ISSN: 0013-9351            Impact factor:   6.498


  9 in total

1.  Neurobehavioral deficits, diseases, and associated costs of exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals in the European Union.

Authors:  Martine Bellanger; Barbara Demeneix; Philippe Grandjean; R Thomas Zoeller; Leonardo Trasande
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 2.  Application of the Navigation Guide systematic review methodology to the evidence for developmental and reproductive toxicity of triclosan.

Authors:  Paula I Johnson; Erica Koustas; Hanna M Vesterinen; Patrice Sutton; Dylan S Atchley; Allegra N Kim; Marlissa Campbell; James M Donald; Saunak Sen; Lisa Bero; Lauren Zeise; Tracey J Woodruff
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 9.621

Review 3.  Chemical contamination and the thyroid.

Authors:  Leonidas H Duntas
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 3.633

4.  Adverse effects in risk assessment: modeling polychlorinated biphenyls and thyroid hormone disruption outcomes in animals and humans.

Authors:  Fred Parham; Amber Wise; Daniel A Axelrad; Kathryn Z Guyton; Christopher Portier; Lauren Zeise; R Thomas Zoeller; Tracey J Woodruff
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 6.498

5.  Building a robust 21st century chemical testing program at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: recommendations for strengthening scientific engagement.

Authors:  Jennifer McPartland; Heather C Dantzker; Christopher J Portier
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 9.031

6.  When enough data are not enough to enact policy: The failure to ban chlorpyrifos.

Authors:  Leonardo Trasande
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 8.029

7.  How Adverse Outcome Pathways Can Aid the Development and Use of Computational Prediction Models for Regulatory Toxicology.

Authors:  Clemens Wittwehr; Hristo Aladjov; Gerald Ankley; Hugh J Byrne; Joop de Knecht; Elmar Heinzle; Günter Klambauer; Brigitte Landesmann; Mirjam Luijten; Cameron MacKay; Gavin Maxwell; M E Bette Meek; Alicia Paini; Edward Perkins; Tomasz Sobanski; Dan Villeneuve; Katrina M Waters; Maurice Whelan
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 4.849

8.  The Florence Statement on Triclosan and Triclocarban.

Authors:  Rolf U Halden; Avery E Lindeman; Allison E Aiello; David Andrews; William A Arnold; Patricia Fair; Rebecca E Fuoco; Laura A Geer; Paula I Johnson; Rainer Lohmann; Kristopher McNeill; Victoria P Sacks; Ted Schettler; Roland Weber; R Thomas Zoeller; Arlene Blum
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 9.  Early life programming as a target for prevention of child and adolescent mental disorders.

Authors:  Andrew James Lewis; Megan Galbally; Tara Gannon; Christos Symeonides
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 8.775

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.