Literature DB >> 22770856

No difference in quality-of-life outcomes after mobile and fixed-bearing medial unicompartmental knee replacement.

David J Biau1, Nelson V Greidanus, Donald S Garbuz, Bassam A Masri.   

Abstract

This is a retrospective study comparing the clinical outcomes of mobile vs fixed medial unicompartmental knee replacements. Patients were identified from a prospectively collected database. Demographic data and pre- and postoperative outcomes (Oxford, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, Short Form Health Survey-12, and satisfaction) were collected-104 knees (90 patients) with minimum 2-years of follow-up: 37 mobile and 67 fixed-bearing. At baseline, the median age was 60 years (mobile) and 66 (fixed); body mass index was significantly higher (32) for the mobile group than for the fixed (28). At follow-up, the groups differed only in the Oxford score: median 83 (mobile) and 90 (fixed). There is no difference in outcomes between mobile and fixed unicompartmental knee replacements.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22770856     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.05.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  7 in total

Review 1.  [Recommendations for unicondylar knee replacement in the course of time : A current inventory].

Authors:  J Beckmann; M T Hirschmann; G Matziolis; J Holz; R V Eisenhart-Rothe; C Becher
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 2.  Fixed- versus mobile-bearing UKA: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Geert Peersman; Bart Stuyts; Tom Vandenlangenbergh; Philippe Cartier; Peter Fennema
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  Mobile Bearing versus Fixed Bearing for Unicompartmental Arthroplasty in Monocompartmental Osteoarthritis of the Knee: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Filippo Migliorini; Nicola Maffulli; Francesco Cuozzo; Karen Elsner; Frank Hildebrand; Jörg Eschweiler; Arne Driessen
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 4.964

4.  Outcome of mobile and fixed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and risk factors for revision.

Authors:  Murat Saylık; Ali Erkan Yenigul; Teoman Atıcı
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2022-08       Impact factor: 1.573

5.  Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty with a Mobile-Bearing Implant.

Authors:  John C Bonano; Andrew A Barrett; Derek F Amanatullah
Journal:  JBJS Essent Surg Tech       Date:  2021-04-19

Review 6.  Outcome of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review of Comparative Studies between Fixed and Mobile Bearings Focusing on Complications.

Authors:  Young-Bong Ko; Manan Ramesh Gujarathi; Kwang-Jun Oh
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2015-09-01

7.  Fixed- versus mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wenchao Zhang; Jianpeng Wang; Hui Li; Wanchun Wang; Daniel M George; Tianlong Huang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.