Literature DB >> 22770797

Use of contraceptive methods and contraceptive recommendations among health care providers actively involved in contraceptive counseling -- results of an international survey in 10 countries.

Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson1, SiHyun Cho, Pirjo Inki, Diana Mansour, Robert Reid, Luis Bahamondes.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to determine the personal choices of contraceptive methods among an international sample of contraception health care professionals (HCPs) and to determine if these choices are concordant with their recommendations to women. STUDY
DESIGN: In an anonymous online survey, 1001 HCPs actively involved in contraceptive counseling [obstetrician/gynecologists (OB/GYNs), general practitioners (GPs) and midwives (only in Sweden)] from 10 countries (Australia, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Korea, Mexico, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom) were asked about their personal use of contraceptive methods and their recommendations to women in two different clinical scenarios: for spacing between children (Group A) and after completion of the family (Group B).
RESULTS: The largest HCP group was OB/GYNs (67.1%), followed by GPs (31.4%) and midwives (1.5%). A total of 42.7% of respondents were male, and 57.3% were female. The majority of respondents were aged 36-45 years (38.9%) or 46-55 years (42.8%), 79.7% had children, and 53.9% were currently using contraception (by themselves or by their partners). Among 540 contraceptive users, the three most common methods were the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS; 29.3%), combined oral contraceptives (COCs; 20.0%) and condoms (17.0%). OB/GYNs were more likely to be using the LNG-IUS than GPs (p=.014). Gender did not seem to influence contraceptive preference. Reasons for these choices were largely influenced by family situation and high contraceptive efficacy (for the LNG-IUS) or side effects caused by other methods (for condoms). The top contraceptive recommendation was COCs for Group A and the LNG-IUS for Group B. HCPs currently using COCs and the LNG-IUS were more likely to recommend these methods than other contraceptive methods for Group A and Group B, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The most popular contraceptive method in this sample of HCPs was the LNG-IUS. Choice of contraceptive method was driven by family situation, age and profession. It appears that, in this sample, personal contraceptive use influences contraceptive recommendations.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22770797     DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.06.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  13 in total

Review 1.  Provider and lay perspectives on intra-uterine contraception: a global review.

Authors:  Marina A S Daniele; John Cleland; Lenka Benova; Moazzam Ali
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 3.223

2.  Association of hormonal contraceptive use with reduced levels of depressive symptoms: a national study of sexually active women in the United States.

Authors:  Katherine M Keyes; Keely Cheslack-Postava; Carolyn Westhoff; Christine M Heim; Michelle Haloossim; Kate Walsh; Karestan Koenen
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-09-15       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Health workers' values and preferences regarding contraceptive methods globally: A systematic review.

Authors:  Komal S Soin; Ping Teresa Yeh; Mary E Gaffield; Christina Ge; Caitlin E Kennedy
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Introduction of the levonorgestrel intrauterine system in Kenya through mobile outreach: review of service statistics and provider perspectives.

Authors:  David Hubacher; Vitalis Akora; Rose Masaba; Mario Chen; Valentine Veena
Journal:  Glob Health Sci Pract       Date:  2014-01-09

5.  The Other Side: How does Informed Choice Affect Induced Abortions among Reproductive-Age Immigrant Women in China-A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Chuanning Yu; Junqing Wu; Yuyan Li; Ying Zhou; Rui Zhao; Honglei Ji; Yi-Ran Li; Ying Han; Qi Tong
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Practices and knowledge of female gynecologists regarding contraceptive use: a real-world Chinese survey.

Authors:  Xin Yang; Xiaodong Li; Yanjie Wang; Xiaojing He; Yang Zhao
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 3.223

Review 7.  Management of pain associated with the insertion of intrauterine contraceptives.

Authors:  K Gemzell-Danielsson; D Mansour; C Fiala; A M Kaunitz; L Bahamondes
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2013-05-12       Impact factor: 15.610

8.  Observational, prospective, multicentre study to evaluate the effects of counselling on the choice of combined hormonal contraceptives in Italy--the ECOS (Educational COunselling effectS) study.

Authors:  Alessandro Gambera; Fedela Corda; Rosetta Papa; Carlo Bastianelli; Sandra Bucciantini; Salvatore Dessole; Pasquale Scagliola; Nadia Bernardini; Daniela de Feo; Fabiola Beligotti
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 2.809

Review 9.  Women's values in contraceptive choice: a systematic review of relevant attributes included in decision aids.

Authors:  Kirk D Wyatt; Ryan T Anderson; Douglas Creedon; Victor M Montori; John Bachman; Patricia Erwin; Annie LeBlanc
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 2.809

10.  Long-acting reversible contraception use among residents in obstetrics/gynecology training programs.

Authors:  Rachel E Zigler; Jeffrey F Peipert; Qiuhong Zhao; Ragini Maddipati; Colleen McNicholas
Journal:  Open Access J Contracept       Date:  2017-01-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.