Literature DB >> 22770790

Abortion misinformation from crisis pregnancy centers in North Carolina.

Amy G Bryant1, Erika E Levi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study assessed the accuracy of medical information provided by crisis pregnancy centers in North Carolina. STUDY
DESIGN: We performed a secondary data analysis of a "secret shopper survey" performed by a nonprofit organization. Reports from phone calls and visits to crisis pregnancy centers were analyzed for quality and content of medical information provided. Web sites of crisis pregnancy centers in the state were also reviewed.
RESULTS: Thirty-two crisis pregnancy centers were contacted. Nineteen of these were visited. Fourteen centers (44%) offered that they "provide counseling on abortion and its risks." Inaccurate information provided included a link between abortion and breast cancer (16%), infertility (26%) and mental health problems (26%). Of the 36 Web sites identified, 31 (86%) provided false or misleading information, including 26 sites (72%) linking abortion to "post-abortion stress."
CONCLUSIONS: Many crisis pregnancy centers give inaccurate medical information regarding the risks of abortion. Overstating risks stigmatizes abortion, seeks to intimidate women and is unethical.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22770790     DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.06.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  9 in total

Review 1.  Crisis Pregnancy Centers: Faith Centers Operating in Bad Faith.

Authors:  Sonya Borrero; Susan Frietsche; Christine Dehlendorf
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  The Foundation in Evidence of Medical and Dental Telephone Consultations.

Authors:  Martina Albrecht; Florian Isenbeck; Jüürgen Kasper; Ingrid Mühlhauser; Anke Steckelberg
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 5.594

3.  Receiving Versus Being Denied a Pregnancy Termination and Subsequent Alcohol Use: A Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  Sarah C M Roberts; Kevin Delucchi; Sharon C Wilsnack; Diana Greene Foster
Journal:  Alcohol Alcohol       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 2.826

Review 4.  The Problems with Crisis Pregnancy Centers: Reviewing the Literature and Identifying New Directions for Future Research.

Authors:  Melissa N Montoya; Colleen Judge-Golden; Jonas J Swartz
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2022-06-08

5.  Assuring quality health care outcomes: lessons learned from car dealers?

Authors:  Joel E Dimsdale
Journal:  Patient Relat Outcome Meas       Date:  2017-01-07

6.  Truth and Transparency in Crisis Pregnancy Centers.

Authors:  Carly Polcyn; Sarah Swiezy; Leah Genn; Pavithra Wickramage; Neha Sidiqqui; Candise Johnson; Pooja Nair; Caitlin Bernard; Velvet Miller
Journal:  Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle)       Date:  2020-07-27

7.  Pregnancy outcomes after exposure to crisis pregnancy centers among an abortion-seeking sample recruited online.

Authors:  Alice F Cartwright; Katherine Tumlinson; Ushma D Upadhyay
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Comparing Website Identification for Crisis Pregnancy Centers and Abortion Clinics.

Authors:  Jonas J Swartz; Carly Rowe; Tracy Truong; Amy G Bryant; Jessica E Morse; Gretchen S Stuart
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2021-07-12

9.  A Web-Based Geolocated Directory of Crisis Pregnancy Centers (CPCs) in the United States: Description of CPC Map Methods and Design Features and Analysis of Baseline Data.

Authors:  Andrea Swartzendruber; Danielle N Lambert
Journal:  JMIR Public Health Surveill       Date:  2020-03-27
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.