Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Chronic kidney disease after vesico-vaginal stone formation around a migrated intrauterine device.

Literature DB >> 22767627

Chronic kidney disease after vesico-vaginal stone formation around a migrated intrauterine device.

R Karsmakers¹, A E Weis-Potters, Guido Buijs, E B Joustra.

Abstract

Although the intrauterine device (IUD) seems a reliable and relatively safe method of contraception, it may cause serious complications. A rare complication is uterus perforation. Intravesical migration and secondary calculus formation is exceptionally uncommon. The authors report on a 75-year-old woman in whom a 'forgotten' migrated IUD resulted in vesico-vaginal fistula formation and chronic kidney disease, 39 years after insertion.

Entities: Disease Species

Mesh：

Year: 2010 PMID： 22767627 PMCID： PMC3029982 DOI： 10.1136/bcr.12.2009.2547

Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMJ Case Rep ISSN： 1757-790X

16 in total

Review 1. [The migrating intrauterine device. Case report and review of the literature].

Authors: B Kassab; P Audra
Journal: Contracept Fertil Sex Date: 1999-10

2. Intravesical migration of intrauterine device resulting in stone formation.

Authors: rfan H Atakan; Mustafa Kaplan; Erol Ertrk
Journal: Urology Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 2.649

3. Uterine perforation on intrauterine device insertion: is the incidence higher than previously reported?

Authors: Mira Harrison-Woolrych; Janelle Ashton; David Coulter
Journal: Contraception Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 3.375

4. Uterine perforation and laparoscopic retrieval of a levonorgestrel intrauterine system (Mirena).

Authors: D O Selo-Ojeme; M E Ekong; C C Welch
Journal: J Obstet Gynaecol Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 1.246

5. Extrauterine mislocated IUD: is surgical removal mandatory?

Authors: Ofer Markovitch; Zvi Klein; Yariv Gidoni; Michael Holzinger; Yoram Beyth
Journal: Contraception Date: 2002-08 Impact factor: 3.375

Review 6. Differential diagnosis of intra-uterine device migrating to bladder using radiographic image of calculus formation and review of literature.

Authors: Bülent Ozçelik; I Serdar Serin; Mustafa Basbug; Ercan Aygen; Oguz Ekmekçioglu
Journal: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol Date: 2003-05-01 Impact factor: 2.435

7. Perforation of urinary bladder by intrauterine device.

Authors: J V Thomalla
Journal: Urology Date: 1986-03 Impact factor: 2.649

8. Perforated and embedded intrauterine devices.

Authors: D Zakin; W Z Stern; R Rosenblatt
Journal: JAMA Date: 1982-04-16 Impact factor: 56.272

Review 9. Complete and partial uterine perforation and embedding following insertion of intrauterine devices. I. Classification, complications, mechanism, incidence, and missing string.

Authors: D Zakin; W Z Stern; R Rosenblatt
Journal: Obstet Gynecol Surv Date: 1981-07 Impact factor: 2.347

Review 10. Intrauterine device and upper-genital-tract infection.

Authors: D A Grimes
Journal: Lancet Date: 2000-09-16 Impact factor: 79.321

5 in total

Review 1. Lippes Loop Inserted 45 Years Back: The Dilemma to Remove It or Leave It in situ. A Case Report with Review of Literature.

Authors: Maruti Sinha; Rekha Rani; Ridhima Gupta; Kishan Chand; Gurcharan Kaur
Journal: J Clin Diagn Res Date: 2015-04-01