Literature DB >> 2276755

Physiological interpretations based on lumped element models fit to respiratory impedance data: use of forward-inverse modeling.

K R Lutchen1, K D Costa.   

Abstract

Respiratory impedance (Zrs) data at lower (less than 4 Hz) and higher (greater than 32 Hz) frequencies require more complicated inverse models than the standard series combination of a respiratory resistance, inertance, and compliance. In this paper, a forward-inverse modeling approach was used to provide insight on how the parameters in these more complicated inverse models reflect the true physiological system. Forward models are set up to incorporate explicit physiological and anatomical detail. Simulated forward data are then fit with identifiable inverse models and the parameter estimates related to the known detail in the forward model. It is shown that inverse fitting of low frequency data alone will not allow a distinction between frequency dependence due to airway inhomogeneities and frequency dependence due to tissue viscoelasticity. With higher frequency data, a forward model based on an asymmetric branching airways network was used to simulate Zrs from 0.1-128 Hz with increasing amounts of nonuniform peripheral airway obstruction. Here, inverse modeling is more amenable to sensibly separating estimates of airway and tissue properties. A key result, however, is that changes in the tissue parameters of an inverse model (which provides an excellent fit to Zrs data) will appropriately occur in response to inhomogeneous alterations in airway diameters only. The apparent altered tissue properties reflect the decreased communication of some tissue segments with the airway opening and not an explicit change at the tissue level. These phenomena present a substantial problem for the inverse modeler. Finally, inverse model fitting of low and high frequency Zrs data simultaneously with a single model is not helpful for extracting additional physiological detail. Instead, separate models should be applied to each frequency range.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2276755     DOI: 10.1109/10.61033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0018-9294            Impact factor:   4.538


  5 in total

1.  Biomedical model fitting and error analysis.

Authors:  Kevin D Costa; Steven H Kleinstein; Uri Hershberg
Journal:  Sci Signal       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 8.192

2.  The augmented RIC model of the human respiratory system.

Authors:  Bill Diong; A Rajagiri; M Goldman; H Nazeran
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2009-01-31       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Estimating respiratory mechanical parameters of ventilated patients: a critical study in the routine intensive-care unit.

Authors:  P Barbini; G Cevenini; K R Lutchen; M Ursino
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Iterative integral parameter identification of a respiratory mechanics model.

Authors:  Christoph Schranz; Paul D Docherty; Yeong Shiong Chiew; Knut Möller; J Geoffrey Chase
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 2.819

Review 5.  A Review on Human Respiratory Modeling.

Authors:  Pardis Ghafarian; Hamidreza Jamaati; Seyed Mohammadreza Hashemian
Journal:  Tanaffos       Date:  2016
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.