Literature DB >> 22767213

Appreciation, use, and management of biodiversity and ecosystem services in California's working landscapes.

Tobias Plieninger1, Shasta Ferranto, Lynn Huntsinger, Maggi Kelly, Christy Getz.   

Abstract

"Working landscapes" is the concept of fostering effective ecosystem stewardship and conservation through active human presence and management and integrating livestock, crop, and timber production with the provision of a broad range of ecosystem services at the landscape scale. Based on a statewide survey of private landowners of "working" forests and rangelands in California, we investigated whether owners who are engaged in commercial livestock or timber production appreciate and manage biodiversity and ecosystem services on their land in different ways than purely residential owners. Both specific uses and management practices, as well as underlying attitudes and motivations toward biodiversity and ecosystem services, were assessed. Correlation analysis showed one bundle of ecosystem goods and services (e.g., livestock, timber, crops, and housing) that is supported by some landowners at the community level. Another closely correlated bundle of biodiversity and ecosystem services includes recreation, hunting/fishing, wildlife habitat, and fire prevention. Producers were more likely to ally with the first bundle and residential owners with the second. The survey further confirmed that cultural ecosystem services and quality-of-life aspects are among the primary amenities that motivate forest and rangeland ownership regardless of ownership type. To live near natural beauty was the most important motive for both landowner groups. Producers were much more active in management for habitat improvement and other environmental goals than residential owners. As the number of production-oriented owners decreases, developing strategies for encouraging environment-positive management by all types of landowners is crucial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22767213     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-012-9900-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  9 in total

1.  Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities.

Authors:  N Myers; R A Mittermeier; C G Mittermeier; G A da Fonseca; J Kent
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-02-24       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Consider the source: the impact of media and authority in outreach to private forest and rangeland owners.

Authors:  Shasta Ferranto; Lynn Huntsinger; William Stewart; Christy Getz; Gary Nakamura; Maggi Kelly
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 6.789

3.  Local and regional partnerships in natural resource management: the challenge of bridging institutional levels.

Authors:  Katrin Prager
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2010-09-24       Impact factor: 3.266

4.  Climate change and forests of the future: managing in the face of uncertainty.

Authors:  Constance I Millar; Nathan L Stephenson; Scott L Stephens
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.657

5.  Assessing landscape functions with broad-scale environmental data: insights gained from a prototype development for Europe.

Authors:  Felix Kienast; Janine Bolliger; Marion Potschin; Rudolf S de Groot; Peter H Verburg; Iris Heller; Dirk Wascher; Roy Haines-Young
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2009-10-24       Impact factor: 3.266

Review 6.  Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services.

Authors:  Elena M Bennett; Garry D Peterson; Line J Gordon
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 9.492

7.  Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes.

Authors:  C Raudsepp-Hearne; G D Peterson; E M Bennett
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Global consequences of land use.

Authors:  Jonathan A Foley; Ruth Defries; Gregory P Asner; Carol Barford; Gordon Bonan; Stephen R Carpenter; F Stuart Chapin; Michael T Coe; Gretchen C Daily; Holly K Gibbs; Joseph H Helkowski; Tracey Holloway; Erica A Howard; Christopher J Kucharik; Chad Monfreda; Jonathan A Patz; I Colin Prentice; Navin Ramankutty; Peter K Snyder
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-07-22       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Conservation planning for ecosystem services.

Authors:  Kai M A Chan; M Rebecca Shaw; David R Cameron; Emma C Underwood; Gretchen C Daily
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 8.029

  9 in total
  5 in total

1.  The Willingness of Non-Industrial Private Forest Owners to Enter California's Carbon Offset Market.

Authors:  Erin Clover Kelly; Gregg J Gold; Joanna Di Tommaso
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Some years you live like a coyote: Gendered practices of cultural resilience in working rangeland landscapes.

Authors:  Hailey Wilmer; María E Fernández-Giménez
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 5.129

3.  Drivers and constraints of land use transitions on Western grasslands: insights from a California mountain ranching community.

Authors:  Nicole Buckley Biggs
Journal:  Landsc Ecol       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 5.043

4.  Environmental impacts of the use of ecosystem services: case study of birdwatching.

Authors:  Jakub Kronenberg
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 3.266

5.  Novel fine-scale aerial mapping approach quantifies grassland weed cover dynamics and response to management.

Authors:  Carolyn M Malmstrom; H Scott Butterfield; Laura Planck; Christopher W Long; Valerie T Eviner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.