Literature DB >> 22766936

Spatial structure of ecological opportunity drives adaptation in a bacterium.

Susan F Bailey1, Rees Kassen.   

Abstract

Abundant ecological opportunity is thought to drive adaptation and diversification. The presence of multiple opportunities leads to divergent selection, which can slow adaptation when niche-specific beneficial mutations have antagonistically pleiotropic effects. Alternately, competition for multiple opportunities can generate divergent selection, which leads to high rates of adaptive differentiation. Which outcome occurs may depend on the spatial structure of those ecological opportunities. In a mixture of resources, competition for multiple opportunities can drive divergent selection; however, if each resource is available in a spatially distinct patch, simultaneous competition for multiple opportunities cannot occur. We report the effects of the extent and spatial structure of ecological opportunity on the evolutionary dynamics of populations of Pseudomonas fluorescens over 1,000 generations. We varied the extent of ecological opportunity by varying the number of sugar resources (mannose, glucose, and xylose), and we varied spatial structure by providing resources in either mixtures or spatially distinct patches. We saw that a particularly novel resource (xylose) drove the rate of adaptation when provided in a mixture but had no effect on diversity. Instead, we saw the evolution of a single adaptive strategy that differed with respect to phenotype and degree of specialization, depending on both the extent and the spatial structure of ecological opportunity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22766936     DOI: 10.1086/666609

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  10 in total

1.  Competition both drives and impedes diversification in a model adaptive radiation.

Authors:  Susan F Bailey; Jeremy R Dettman; Paul B Rainey; Rees Kassen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Sympatric inhibition and niche differentiation suggest alternative coevolutionary trajectories among Streptomycetes.

Authors:  Linda L Kinkel; Daniel C Schlatter; Kun Xiao; Anita D Baines
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 10.302

Review 3.  Experimental Evolution of Innovation and Novelty.

Authors:  Rees Kassen
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  Molecular signatures of resource competition: Clonal interference favors ecological diversification and can lead to incipient speciation.

Authors:  Massimo Amicone; Isabel Gordo
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 4.171

5.  Evolution of evolvability and phenotypic plasticity in virtual cells.

Authors:  Thomas D Cuypers; Jacob P Rutten; Paulien Hogeweg
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 3.260

6.  Experimental evolution of competing bean beetle species reveals long-term reversals of short-term evolution, but no consistent character displacement.

Authors:  Stephen J Hausch; Steven M Vamosi; Jeremy W Fox
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Experimental Evolution of Interference Competition.

Authors:  Florien A Gorter; Carolina Tabares-Mafla; Rees Kassen; Sijmen E Schoustra
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 8.  Can the experimental evolution programme help us elucidate the genetic basis of adaptation in nature?

Authors:  Susan F Bailey; Thomas Bataillon
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 6.185

9.  Evolution by flight and fight: diverse mechanisms of adaptation by actively motile microbes.

Authors:  Olaya Rendueles; Gregory J Velicer
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 10.302

10.  Environmental determinism, and not interspecific competition, drives morphological variability in Australasian warblers (Acanthizidae).

Authors:  Vicente García-Navas; Marta Rodríguez-Rey; Petter Z Marki; Les Christidis
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 2.912

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.