Heidi J Dalton1, Warwick W Butt. 1. Phoenix Children's Hospital, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Phoenix, AZ, USA. hdalton@phoenixchildrens.com
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The field of extracorporeal life support, which has focused predominantly on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in the past, is undergoing rapid expansion following years of stagnation as newer devices and improved technology have become available. Additionally, new cannulae and cannulation techniques have allowed extracorporeal life support to be expanded to many groups who would have been excluded from support in the past. REVIEW: This update will review the current state of the art since Rogers' Textbook of Pediatric Intensive Care (Fourth Edition) was published several years ago. The changing environment of extracorporeal support in terms of patient populations, technological advances, patient management, and outcome will be discussed. CONCLUSIONS: Continued examination of the criteria and circumstances where extracorporeal life support is applied as well as outcomes which include morbidity, cost effectiveness, and quality of life are needed areas of continued research. Increasing collaborations between all centers performing extracorporeal life support throughout the world should remain a priority to further research and understanding of this complex field.
INTRODUCTION: The field of extracorporeal life support, which has focused predominantly on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in the past, is undergoing rapid expansion following years of stagnation as newer devices and improved technology have become available. Additionally, new cannulae and cannulation techniques have allowed extracorporeal life support to be expanded to many groups who would have been excluded from support in the past. REVIEW: This update will review the current state of the art since Rogers' Textbook of Pediatric Intensive Care (Fourth Edition) was published several years ago. The changing environment of extracorporeal support in terms of patient populations, technological advances, patient management, and outcome will be discussed. CONCLUSIONS: Continued examination of the criteria and circumstances where extracorporeal life support is applied as well as outcomes which include morbidity, cost effectiveness, and quality of life are needed areas of continued research. Increasing collaborations between all centers performing extracorporeal life support throughout the world should remain a priority to further research and understanding of this complex field.
Authors: Sophia F Tam; Anahita Mobargha; Joseph Tobias; Christine A Schad; Shunpei Okochi; William Middlesworth; Vincent Duron Journal: Int Wound J Date: 2018-12-02 Impact factor: 3.315
Authors: Yigit S Guner; Matthew T Harting; Kelly Fairbairn; Patrick T Delaplain; Lishi Zhang; Yanjun Chen; Mustafa H Kabeer; Peter Yu; John P Cleary; James E Stein; Charles Stolar; Danh V Nguyen Journal: J Pediatr Surg Date: 2018-06-07 Impact factor: 2.545
Authors: Ryan P Barbaro; Folafoluwa O Odetola; Kelley M Kidwell; Matthew L Paden; Robert H Bartlett; Matthew M Davis; Gail M Annich Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2015-04-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Clark G Owyang; Claire Donnat; Daniel Brodie; Hayley B Gershengorn; May Hua; Nida Qadir; Joseph E Tonna Journal: Artif Organs Date: 2022-02-11 Impact factor: 2.663
Authors: Melania M Bembea; Ramon Lee; Desiree Masten; Kathleen K Kibler; Christoph U Lehmann; Kenneth M Brady; Blaine Easley Journal: J Extra Corpor Technol Date: 2013-03
Authors: Ryan P Barbaro; Robert H Bartlett; Rachel L Chapman; Matthew L Paden; Lloyd A Roberts; Achamyeleh Gebremariam; Gail M Annich; Matthew M Davis Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2016-03-19 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Yigit S Guner; Patrick T Delaplain; Lishi Zhang; Matteo Di Nardo; Thomas V Brogan; Yanjun Chen; John P Cleary; Peter T Yu; Matthew T Harting; Henri R Ford; Danh V Nguyen Journal: ASAIO J Date: 2019-07 Impact factor: 2.872