Literature DB >> 22766366

R1 resection in pancreatic cancer has significant impact on long-term outcome in standardized pathology modified for routine use.

Bettina M Rau1, Katharina Moritz, Sarah Schuschan, Guido Alsfasser, Friedrich Prall, Ernst Klar.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The quality of a histopathologic workup after oncologic resection of pancreatic malignancies has changed the central role of surgery substantially for radical tumor clearance over the past years. The development of standardized protocols for pathologic workup increased the rate of R1 resections from around 20% up to 80%. In the present study, we investigated the incidence of R1 and its impact on survival after oncologic pancreatic resections using a standardized pathologic routine protocol. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed 265 pancreatic resections from September 2003 to September 2010. Among 128 patients with malignant neoplasms, histology revealed ductal pancreatic adenocarcinoma in 97, ampullary cancer in 10, and distal bile duct cancer in 21 patients. Resected specimens were analyzed according to this improved standardized pathology protocol introduced in 2000. Follow-up data on overall and cancer-related survival, presence and site of tumor recurrence, and chemotherapy were obtained from 120 patients.
RESULTS: Pancreatic resection comprised a pylorus-preserving or classical pancreaticoduodenectomy in 112, a distal pancreatectomy in 8, and a total pancreatectomy in 7 patients. In the overall series, 56 (44%) were classified R1 resections and 68 (43%) R0 resections, 3 patients with R2 resections were excluded, leaving 125 patients for analysis. In pancreatic adenocarcinoma, the rate of R1 was 51% (48/94). R1 resection involved most frequently the circumferential margin in 86% (48/125) of the total group and in 92% (44/48) in pancreatic cancer. Follow-up was performed after a median of 17 months (range, 1-85) postoperatively. Cancer-related death rate in R0 and R1-resected patients was 60% and 83% (P < .02) in all cancers (n = 117) and 66% and 80% in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (n = 88). Median tumor-related survival in R0 and R1 resections was 22 (range, 4-85) vs 14 months (range, 2-48) in all cancers (P < .002), and 19 (range, 4-85) vs 14 months (range, 2-48) in pancreatic adenocarcinoma (P < .04). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed a survival benefit after R0 resection in both all cancers (P = .002) and pancreatic adenocarcinoma (P < .02). The pattern of tumor recurrence had a greater rate of regional metastases in the R1 group (P < .05).
CONCLUSION: Our 51% rate of R1 resections in ductal pancreatic carcinoma indicates a high quality standard of pathologic evaluation. The vast majority of R1 margins are located at the retroperitoneal dissection surface. Standardization of histopathologic analysis has a clinically relevant impact on survival after oncologic resection of pancreatic cancer and can be achieved by less extensive protocols.
Copyright © 2012 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22766366     DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2012.05.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  48 in total

Review 1.  Pathologic assessment of gastrointestinal tract and pancreatic carcinoma after neoadjuvant therapy.

Authors:  Reetesh K Pai; Rish K Pai
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 7.842

2.  Whipple made simple for surgical pathologists: orientation, dissection, and sampling of pancreaticoduodenectomy specimens for a more practical and accurate evaluation of pancreatic, distal common bile duct, and ampullary tumors.

Authors:  N Volkan Adsay; Olca Basturk; Burcu Saka; Pelin Bagci; Denizhan Ozdemir; Serdar Balci; Juan M Sarmiento; David A Kooby; Charles Staley; Shishir K Maithel; Rhonda Everett; Jeanette D Cheng; Duangpeng Thirabanjasak; Donald W Weaver
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 6.394

Review 3.  Mesopancreas: A boundless structure, namely the rationale for dissection of the paraaortic area in pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic head carcinoma.

Authors:  Nadia Peparini
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-03-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  [R1 resection for pancreatic carcinoma].

Authors:  G F Weber; S Kersting; F Haller; R Grützmann
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 5.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Long Peng; Shengrong Lin; Yong Li; Weidong Xiao
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Posterior Superior Mesenteric Artery (SMA) First Approach vs. Standard Pancreaticoduodenectomy in Patients with Resectable Periampullary Cancers: a Prospective Comparison Focusing on Circumferential Resection Margins.

Authors:  Sujoy Pal; Joseph George; Anand Narayan Singh; Sandeep Mathur; Nihar Ranjan Dash; Pramod Garg; Peush Sahni; T K Chattopadhyay
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2018-09

7.  Pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a French multicentre prospective evaluation of resection margins in 150 evaluable specimens.

Authors:  Jean Robert Delpero; Philippe Bachellier; Nicolas Regenet; Yves Patrice Le Treut; François Paye; Nicolas Carrere; Alain Sauvanet; Aurélie Autret; Olivier Turrini; Geneviève Monges-Ranchin; Jean Marie Boher
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 3.647

8.  Impact of margin status and lymphadenectomy on clinical outcomes in resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma: implications for adjuvant radiotherapy.

Authors:  Arsen Osipov; Jason Naziri; Andrew Hendifar; Deepti Dhall; Joanne K Rutgers; Shefali Chopra; Quanlin Li; Mourad Tighiouart; Alagappan Annamalai; Nicholas N Nissen; Richard Tuli
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2016-04

9.  Is Watchful Waiting an Option in Margin-Positive Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasms of the Pancreas?

Authors:  Rachid G Nagem
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2018-03

10.  Pancreaticoduodenectomy with combined superior mesenteric vein resection without reconstruction is possible: A case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Lionel Jouffret; Theophile Guilbaud; Olivier Turrini; Jean-Robert Delpero
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 1.337

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.