Literature DB >> 22765852

Laparoscopic radical cystectomy: a 5-year review of a single institute's operative data and complications and a systematic review of the literature.

Omar M Aboumarzouk1, Tomasz Drewa, Pawel Olejniczak, Piotr L Chlosta.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We aim to evaluate our experience and results with laparoscopic radical cystectomy and conduct a systematic review of studies reporting on 50 or more procedures.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between February 2006 and March 2011, a prospective study in a single institute on patients with bladder cancer who underwent laparoscopic radical cystectomy was conducted. A search of the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Medline, and Scopus databases was conducted for studies reporting on 50 or more laparoscopic radical cystectomy procedures to compare with our results.
RESULTS: Sixty men and five women underwent laparoscopic radical cystectomy during the 5-year study period. Thirty-nine patients were submitted to ileal conduits, 24 to neobladders, and two patients to ureterocutaneostomies. The mean operative time was 294 ± 27 minutes, the mean blood loss was 249.69 ± 95.59 millilitres, the mean length of hospital stay was 9.42 ± 2 days, the mean morphine requirement was 3.69 ± 0.8 days. The overall complication rate was 44.6% (29/65). However, the majority of the patients with complications (90% (26/29)) had minor complications treated conservatively with no further surgical intervention needed. The literature search found seven studies, which reported on their institutions' laparoscopic radical cystectomy results of 50 or more patients. Generally, our results were similar to other reported studies of the same calibre.
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic radical cystectomy is a safe and efficient modality of treatment of bladder cancer. However, it comes with a steep learning curve, once overcome, can provide an alternative to open radical cystectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22765852     DOI: 10.1590/s1677-55382012000300006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Braz J Urol        ISSN: 1677-5538            Impact factor:   1.541


  5 in total

1.  Robotic versus open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in adults.

Authors:  Bhavan Prasad Rai; Jasper Bondad; Nikhil Vasdev; Jim Adshead; Tim Lane; Kamran Ahmed; Mohammed S Khan; Prokar Dasgupta; Khurshid Guru; Piotr L Chlosta; Omar M Aboumarzouk
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-04-24

2.  Laparoscopic radical cystectomy: neobladder or ileal conduit, debate still goes on.

Authors:  Omar M Aboumarzouk; Tomasz Drewa; Pawel Olejniczak; Piotr L Chlosta
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2014-04-17

3.  Long-term urodynamic evaluation of laparoscopic radical cystectomy with orthotopic ileal neobladder for bladder cancer.

Authors:  Dong Wang; Li-Jun Li; Jing Liu; Ming-Xing Qiu
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 2.967

4.  Pure intracorporeal laparoscopic radical cystectomy with orthotopic "U" shaped ileal neobladder.

Authors:  Antonio Luigi Pastore; Giovanni Palleschi; Luigi Silvestri; Giuseppe Cavallaro; Mario Rizzello; Gianfranco Silecchia; Cosimo de Nunzio; Samer Fathi Al-Rawashdah; Vincenzo Petrozza; Antonio Carbone
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 2.264

5.  Randomized Controlled Trial of Laparoscopic versus Open Radical Cystectomy in a Laparoscopic Naïve Center.

Authors:  Waleed Mohamed Fadlalla; Ayman Hanafy; Mahmoud Abdelhakim; Hatem Aboulkassem; El Sayed Ashraf; Ahmed Abdelbary
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2021-07-07
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.