T Romer1, W Wiesner. 1. Department of Radiology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the prevalence and CT findings of accessory spleens in the normal population. MATERIAL AND METHODS: CT-examinations of 1735 consecutive patients, all examined by triple phase 16-row multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) of the abdomen, were retrospectively analyzed with special emphasis on the presence, location and imaging aspects of accessory spleens. RESULTS: 199 patients showed an accessory spleen (11%). Size of accessory spleens ranged from 3 to 20 mm (mean 10 mm). In 60% the accessory spleen was located at the level of the splenic hilum and in 33% at the level of the lower pole. In 46% the accessory spleen was located medially and in 43% ventrally. 19 patients presented with two (1.1%) and seven patients with three accessory spleens (0.4%), respectively. One patient showed splenosis and one patient showed an enlarged accessory spleen (5 cm) secondary to a splenic apoplexy (i.e. hemorrhagic infarction) of the accessory spleen, caused by torsion. CONCLUSION: Accessory spleens may be identified by MDCT in about 11% of patients. Familiarity with normal imaging findings and knowledge on differential diagnoses, possible pathologies and potential pitfalls helps to differentiate from other findings in the upper abdomen.
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the prevalence and CT findings of accessory spleens in the normal population. MATERIAL AND METHODS: CT-examinations of 1735 consecutive patients, all examined by triple phase 16-row multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) of the abdomen, were retrospectively analyzed with special emphasis on the presence, location and imaging aspects of accessory spleens. RESULTS: 199 patients showed an accessory spleen (11%). Size of accessory spleens ranged from 3 to 20 mm (mean 10 mm). In 60% the accessory spleen was located at the level of the splenic hilum and in 33% at the level of the lower pole. In 46% the accessory spleen was located medially and in 43% ventrally. 19 patients presented with two (1.1%) and seven patients with three accessory spleens (0.4%), respectively. One patient showed splenosis and one patient showed an enlarged accessory spleen (5 cm) secondary to a splenic apoplexy (i.e. hemorrhagic infarction) of the accessory spleen, caused by torsion. CONCLUSION: Accessory spleens may be identified by MDCT in about 11% of patients. Familiarity with normal imaging findings and knowledge on differential diagnoses, possible pathologies and potential pitfalls helps to differentiate from other findings in the upper abdomen.
Authors: Jeong Woo Kim; Kyeong Ah Kim; Ki Choon Sim; Jisun Lee; Bit Na Park; Mi Jin Song; Yang Shin Park; Jongmee Lee; Jae Woong Choi; Chang Hee Lee Journal: Abdom Radiol (NY) Date: 2022-04-19