PURPOSE: Opportunistic health screening has long been promoted by advocates of adolescent health. However, there are few objective data documenting the outcomes in an inpatient setting. METHODS: The authors performed opportunistic health screening on 114 surgical inpatients, median age 14 (range 10-18) years, admitted to a general adolescent ward in a tertiary children's hospital. A four-page paper document with a formatted list of questions, based on the Home, Education, Activities, Drugs, Sexual Health, Suicide framework, was developed to standardise screening and documentation. RESULTS: Areas of concern requiring intervention were identified in 34 (30%) patients. Specific interventions included referrals to the Adolescent Medicine clinic (n=6), Hospital School Services (n=7) and Psychological Medicine (n=7). CONCLUSIONS: Consideration should be given to offer adolescent health screening to all surgical inpatients. Further research should involve the participation of young people and should focus on the outcomes, feasibility, acceptability and resource implications of such screening.
PURPOSE: Opportunistic health screening has long been promoted by advocates of adolescent health. However, there are few objective data documenting the outcomes in an inpatient setting. METHODS: The authors performed opportunistic health screening on 114 surgical inpatients, median age 14 (range 10-18) years, admitted to a general adolescent ward in a tertiary children's hospital. A four-page paper document with a formatted list of questions, based on the Home, Education, Activities, Drugs, Sexual Health, Suicide framework, was developed to standardise screening and documentation. RESULTS: Areas of concern requiring intervention were identified in 34 (30%) patients. Specific interventions included referrals to the Adolescent Medicine clinic (n=6), Hospital School Services (n=7) and Psychological Medicine (n=7). CONCLUSIONS: Consideration should be given to offer adolescent health screening to all surgical inpatients. Further research should involve the participation of young people and should focus on the outcomes, feasibility, acceptability and resource implications of such screening.
Authors: Lauren J Rice; Tracey W Tsang; Emily Carter; Marmingee Hand; Jadnah Davies; Sue Thomas; Eric Bedford; Emma Bear; Cheyenne Carter; Lisa Cannon; Elizabeth J Elliott Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-04-01 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Alex H S Harris; Thomas Bowe; Robin N Kamal; Erika D Sears; Mary Hawn; Dan Eisenberg; Andrea K Finlay; Hildi J Hagedorn; Seshadri Mudumbai Journal: Perioper Med (Lond) Date: 2022-09-13
Authors: Sandy R Whitehouse; Pei-Yoong Lam; Ellen Balka; Shelagh McLellan; Mariana Deevska; Daniel Penn; Robert Issenman; Mary Paone Journal: JMIR Res Protoc Date: 2013-10-18