Literature DB >> 22763180

Natural variability of hepatic biomarkers in Mediterranean deep-sea organisms.

Samuel Koenig1, Montserrat Solé.   

Abstract

Biomarker assays are widely used as proxies for contaminant-induced effects in aquatic organisms. However, in many cases, their intrinsic natural variability due to exogenous and endogenous factors makes the interpretation of biomarker data difficult. In the present study, we investigated the natural fluctuations of six hepatic biomarkers, namely ethoxyresorufin-O-deethylase (EROD) in fish and pentoxyresorufin-O-deethylase (PROD) in crustacea, catalase (CAT), carboxylesterase (CbE), glutathione-S-transferase (GST), total glutathione peroxidase (GPX) and glutathione reductase (GR) in two deep-sea fish species, namely Alepocephalus rostratus and Lepidion lepidion and the decapod crustacean Aristeus antennatus. The NW Mediterranean deep-sea environment is characterized by very stable temperature and salinity conditions, allowing the exclusion of these two factors as potential sources of interference with biomarker activities. Biomarker results exhibited a clear influence of reproductive processes on enzyme activities, in particular in A. rostratus, which presented a pronounced seasonal pattern linked to variations in the gonadosomatic index (GSI). In addition, other factors such as food availability may also have influenced the observed variability, in particular in specimens of L. lepidion, which did not exhibit variations in reproductive activity throughout the sampling period. Depth-related variability did not exhibit a clear trend and fluctuations across sampling depths were not attributable to any specific factor. Body size had also a significant influence on some biomarkers, although allometric scaling of certain enzyme activities appears to be species-specific. The present work has thus shown that despite the lack of fluctuations of abiotic parameters such as temperature and salinity, biomarker activities in deep-sea organisms still exhibit significant variability, mainly as a result of reproductive processes and food availability.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22763180     DOI: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2012.06.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mar Environ Res        ISSN: 0141-1136            Impact factor:   3.130


  7 in total

1.  Natural variability of enzymatic biomarkers in freshwater invertebrates.

Authors:  Alessio Ippolito; Roberto Giacchini; Paolo Parenti; Marco Vighi
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  An integrated assessment of pollution and biological effects in flounder, mussels and sediment in the southern Baltic Sea coastal area.

Authors:  Henryka Dabrowska; Orest Kopko; Kari K Lehtonen; Thomas Lang; Ilona Waszak; Maija Balode; Evita Strode
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Multibiomarker biomonitoring approach using three bivalve species in the Ebro Delta (Catalonia, Spain).

Authors:  Sara Dallarés; Noelia Carrasco; Diana Álvarez-Muñoz; Maria Rambla-Alegre; Montserrat Solé
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Drugs of environmental concern modify Solea senegalensis physiology and biochemistry in a temperature-dependent manner.

Authors:  A González-Mira; I Varó; M Solé; A Torreblanca
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Glutathione S-transferase activities in African catfish injected with β-naphthoflavone: effects of ploidy, gender, dose, and sampling time.

Authors:  A Karami; S C Courtenay
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 2.513

Review 6.  Enzymatic Processes in Marine Biotechnology.

Authors:  Antonio Trincone
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2017-03-25       Impact factor: 5.118

7.  Natural variability of biochemical biomarkers in the macro-zoobenthos: Dependence on life stage and environmental factors.

Authors:  Lucia Scarduelli; Roberto Giacchini; Paolo Parenti; Sonia Migliorati; Agnese Maria Di Brisco; Marco Vighi
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 3.742

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.