BACKGROUND: It is traditionally difficult to estimate left ventricular (LV) systolic function in atrial fibrillation (AF). The aim of this study was to validate the use of an index beat, the beat after the nearly equal preceding (RR1) and pre-preceding (RR2) intervals, for the measurement of LV peak longitudinal systolic strain (PLSS). The difference between RR1 and RR2 intervals of the index beat must be <60 msec. LV PLSS measured from the index beat (PLSSindex) was compared with LV PLSS measured from the conventional but time-consuming method of averaging multiple cardiac cycles (PLSSavg). METHODS: Ninety-eight patients with persistent or permanent AF and resting ventricular rates ≤ 105 beats/min were prospectively included. LV PLSSindex and LV PLSSavg were obtained from two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography. RESULTS: LV PLSSindex had a highly significant correlation with LV PLSSavg (r = 0.970, P < .001). Bland-Altman analysis showed only small bias of 0.01%, and the 95% limits of agreement were +1.64% to -1.62%. Compared with those with lower risk scores of stroke indicated by CHADS(2) scores < 2 or CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc scores < 2, patients with higher risk scores of stroke indicated by CHADS(2) scores ≥ 2 or CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc scores ≥ 2 had lower PLSSavg and PLSSindex (P ≤ .012). CONCLUSIONS: LV PLSSindex was a good alternative to LV PLSSavg in patients with AF. Use of the index beat to measure LV longitudinal systolic strain in patients with AF was as accurate as the time-consuming method of averaging multiple cardiac cycles.
BACKGROUND: It is traditionally difficult to estimate left ventricular (LV) systolic function in atrial fibrillation (AF). The aim of this study was to validate the use of an index beat, the beat after the nearly equal preceding (RR1) and pre-preceding (RR2) intervals, for the measurement of LV peak longitudinal systolic strain (PLSS). The difference between RR1 and RR2 intervals of the index beat must be <60 msec. LV PLSS measured from the index beat (PLSSindex) was compared with LV PLSS measured from the conventional but time-consuming method of averaging multiple cardiac cycles (PLSSavg). METHODS: Ninety-eight patients with persistent or permanent AF and resting ventricular rates ≤ 105 beats/min were prospectively included. LV PLSSindex and LV PLSSavg were obtained from two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography. RESULTS: LV PLSSindex had a highly significant correlation with LV PLSSavg (r = 0.970, P < .001). Bland-Altman analysis showed only small bias of 0.01%, and the 95% limits of agreement were +1.64% to -1.62%. Compared with those with lower risk scores of stroke indicated by CHADS(2) scores < 2 or CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc scores < 2, patients with higher risk scores of stroke indicated by CHADS(2) scores ≥ 2 or CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc scores ≥ 2 had lower PLSSavg and PLSSindex (P ≤ .012). CONCLUSIONS: LV PLSSindex was a good alternative to LV PLSSavg in patients with AF. Use of the index beat to measure LV longitudinal systolic strain in patients with AF was as accurate as the time-consuming method of averaging multiple cardiac cycles.
Authors: Jonathan Buggey; Fawaz Alenezi; Hyun Ju Yoon; Matthew Phelan; Adam D DeVore; Michel G Khouri; Phillip J Schulte; Eric J Velazquez Journal: ESC Heart Fail Date: 2017-04-20
Authors: Daniel Modin; Morten Sengeløv; Peter Godsk Jørgensen; Niels Eske Bruun; Flemming Javier Olsen; Maria Dons; Thomas Fritz Hansen; Jan Skov Jensen; Tor Biering-Sørensen Journal: ESC Heart Fail Date: 2017-10-11
Authors: Karina V Bunting; Simrat K Gill; Alice Sitch; Samir Mehta; Kieran O'Connor; Gregory Yh Lip; Paulus Kirchhof; Victoria Y Strauss; Kazem Rahimi; A John Camm; Mary Stanbury; Michael Griffith; Jonathan N Townend; Georgios V Gkoutos; Andreas Karwath; Richard P Steeds; Dipak Kotecha Journal: Heart Date: 2021-03-10 Impact factor: 7.365