Literature DB >> 22762840

Establishing the accuracy and acceptability of abdominal ultrasound to define the foetal head position in the second stage of labour: a validation study.

Meenakshi Ramphul1, Mairead Kennelly, Deirdre J Murphy.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the diagnosis of the foetal head position in the second stage of labour by ultrasound scan performed by a novice sonographer and by clinical assessment, to that of an expert sonographer (gold standard); and to evaluate the acceptability of ultrasound in the second stage of labour to women and clinicians. STUDY
DESIGN: This is a case series. We recruited sixty women delivering in a university hospital in Dublin, Ireland. An abdominal scan was performed by a novice and an expert ultrasonographer and a clinical assessment was performed by an obstetrician or midwife. Each assessor was blinded to the findings of the others. The main outcome measures were errors in the diagnosis of the foetal head position and acceptability of abdominal ultrasound in the second stage of labour.
RESULTS: The ultrasound findings of the novice and expert ultrasonographers were consistent in 52 (87%) cases for the foetal head position; 80% accuracy for the first ten scans performed by the novice (median time 150 s) and 90% for the last ten scans (median time 10s). The novice made no occipito-anterior/occipito-posterior (OA/OP) errors. The clinical diagnosis of the foetal head position was incorrect in 25 (42%) cases; 8 (13%) OA/OP errors. Women and clinicians did not consider the ultrasound assessment to be intrusive.
CONCLUSION: An abdominal scan by a novice ultrasonographer is an accurate and acceptable method of diagnosing the foetal head position in the second stage of labour and may have a role to play in assessment prior to instrumental delivery.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22762840     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.06.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol        ISSN: 0301-2115            Impact factor:   2.435


  5 in total

1.  Study protocol. IDUS - Instrumental delivery & ultrasound: a multi-centre randomised controlled trial of ultrasound assessment of the fetal head position versus standard care as an approach to prevent morbidity at instrumental delivery.

Authors:  Deirdre J Murphy; Gerard Burke; Alan A Montgomery; Meenakshi Ramphul
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 3.007

2.  Maternal positioning to correct occipito-posterior fetal position in labour: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Marie-Julia Guittier; Véronique Othenin-Girard; Olivier Irion; Michel Boulvain
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 3.007

3.  Benefits and pitfalls of the use of intrapartum ultrasound.

Authors:  Sana Usman; Christoph Lees
Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2015-12-31

4.  Acceptability of Intrapartum Ultrasound Monitoring - Experience from a Romanian Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  D G Iliescu; S Tudorache; M L Cara; R Dragusin; O Carbunaru; M Florea; C Patru; L Zorila; A Dragoescu; L Novac; N Cernea
Journal:  Curr Health Sci J       Date:  2015-12-22

5.  Midwives' views on the acceptability of a future trial of the Sims posture for fetal malposition in labor in the context of their knowledge and practice: A mixed-methods study.

Authors:  Jennifer Barrowclough; Caroline Crowther; Bridget Kool
Journal:  Eur J Midwifery       Date:  2022-08-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.