Literature DB >> 22762392

The nocebo effect of informed consent.

Shlomo Cohen1.   

Abstract

The nocebo effect, the mirror-phenomenon to the placebo effect, is when the expectation of a negative outcome precipitates the corresponding symptom or leads to its exacerbation. One of the basic ethical duties in health care is to obtain informed consent from patients before treatment; however, the disclosure of information regarding potential complications or side effects that this involves may precipitate a nocebo effect. While dilemmas between the principles of respect for patient autonomy and of nonmaleficence are recognized in medical ethics, there has not yet been an ethical discussion focused on the potential dilemma raised by the nocebo effect of informed consent (NEIC). This dilemma is especially pernicious, since it involves a direct causality of harm by the caregiver that is unparalleled by other potential harmful effects of information disclosure. This paper articulates the dilemma of the NEIC and offers a seminal ethical analysis.
© 2012 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  autonomy; information disclosure; informed consent; nocebo; respect; risk-benefit analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22762392     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2012.01983.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioethics        ISSN: 0269-9702            Impact factor:   1.898


  19 in total

1.  An audit of the knowledge and attitudes of doctors towards Surgical Informed Consent (SIC).

Authors:  Bushra Ashraf; Nasira Tasnim; Muhammad Saaiq; Khaleeq-Uz- Zaman
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2014-10-27

2.  (Re)disclosing physician financial interests: rebuilding trust or making unreasonable burdens on physicians?

Authors:  Daniel Sperling
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2017-06

Review 3.  Comparative effectiveness trials: generic misassumptions underlying the SUPPORT controversy.

Authors:  Jon E Tyson; Michele Walsh; Carl T D'Angio
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  Neurofeedback as placebo: a case of unintentional deception?

Authors:  Louiza Kalokairinou; Laura Specker Sullivan; Anna Wexler
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 5.926

Review 5.  The placebo and nocebo effects in functional urology.

Authors:  Hadi Mostafaei; Sandra Jilch; Greta Lisa Carlin; Keiichiro Mori; Fahad Quhal; Benjamin Pradere; Ekaterina Laukhtina; Victor M Schuettfort; Abdulmajeed Aydh; Reza Sari Motlagh; Claus G Roehrborn; Shahrokh F Shariat; Sakineh Hajebrahimi
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 6.  Nonspecific adverse events in knee osteoarthritis clinical trials: a systematic review.

Authors:  Yun Hyung Koog; Jin Su Lee; Hyungsun Wi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Nocebo effect in randomized clinical trials of antidepressants in children and adolescents: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Johanna Carolina Rojas-Mirquez; Milton Jose Max Rodriguez-Zuñiga; Francisco Javier Bonilla-Escobar; Herney Andres Garcia-Perdomo; Mike Petkov; Lino Becerra; David Borsook; Clas Linnman
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 3.558

8.  Commentary: Hypnotic Medications and Suicide: Risk, Mechanisms, Mitigation, and the FDA.

Authors:  Xiulu Ruan; Jin Jun Luo; Alan David Kaye
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 4.157

9.  Learning to experience side effects after antidepressant intake - Results from a randomized, controlled, double-blind study.

Authors:  Julia Rheker; Alexander Winkler; Bettina K Doering; Winfried Rief
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 10.  Minimizing nocebo effect: Pragmatic approach.

Authors:  Majed Chamsi-Pasha; Mohammed Ali Albar; Hassan Chamsi-Pasha
Journal:  Avicenna J Med       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.