Literature DB >> 22762345

Optimal stomatal conductance in relation to photosynthesis in climatically contrasting Eucalyptus species under drought.

Arnaud Héroult1, Yan-Shih Lin, Aimee Bourne, Belinda E Medlyn, David S Ellsworth.   

Abstract

Models of stomatal conductance (g(s)) are based on coupling between g(s) and CO(2) assimilation (A(net)), and it is often assumed that the slope of this relationship ('g(1) ') is constant across species. However, if different plant species have adapted to different access costs of water, then there will be differences in g(1) among species. We hypothesized that g(1) should vary among species adapted to different climates, and tested the theory and its linkage to plant hydraulics using four Eucalyptus species from different climatic origins in a common garden. Optimal stomatal theory predicts that species from sub-humid zones have a lower marginal water cost of C gain, hence lower g(1) than humid-zone species. In agreement with the theory that g(1) is related to tissue carbon costs for water supply, we found a relationship between wood density and g(1) across Eucalyptus species of contrasting climatic origins. There were significant reductions in the parameter g(1) during drought in humid but not sub-humid species, with the latter group maintaining g(1) in drought. There are strong differences in stomatal behaviour among related tree species in agreement with optimal stomatal theory, and these differences are consistent with the economics involved in water uptake and transport for carbon gain.
© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22762345     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2012.02570.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Cell Environ        ISSN: 0140-7791            Impact factor:   7.228


  20 in total

1.  Species climate range influences hydraulic and stomatal traits in Eucalyptus species.

Authors:  Aimee E Bourne; Danielle Creek; Jennifer M R Peters; David S Ellsworth; Brendan Choat
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Non-stomatal processes reduce gross primary productivity in temperate forest ecosystems during severe edaphic drought.

Authors:  Louis Gourlez de la Motte; Quentin Beauclaire; Bernard Heinesch; Mathias Cuntz; Lenka Foltýnová; Ladislav Šigut; Natalia Kowalska; Giovanni Manca; Ignacio Goded Ballarin; Caroline Vincke; Marilyn Roland; Andreas Ibrom; Denis Lousteau; Lukas Siebicke; Johan Neiryink; Bernard Longdoz
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Optimal stomatal behavior with competition for water and risk of hydraulic impairment.

Authors:  Adam Wolf; William R L Anderegg; Stephen W Pacala
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Seasonal stomatal behavior of a common desert shrub and the influence of plant neighbors.

Authors:  Heather Kropp; Kiona Ogle
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-12-20       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Quantitative trait loci mapping for stomatal traits in interspecific hybrids of Eucalyptus.

Authors:  M Sumathi; V K W Bachpai; B Deeparaj; A Mayavel; Modhumita Ghosh Dasgupta; B Nagarajan; D Rajasugunasekar; V Sivakumar; R Yasodha
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.166

6.  Aerosol Impacts on Water Relations of Camphor (Cinnamomum camphora).

Authors:  Chia-Ju Ellen Chi; Daniel Zinsmeister; I-Ling Lai; Shih-Chieh Chang; Yau-Lun Kuo; Jürgen Burkhardt
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 6.627

7.  Long-term water stress leads to acclimation of drought sensitivity of photosynthetic capacity in xeric but not riparian Eucalyptus species.

Authors:  Shuang-Xi Zhou; Belinda E Medlyn; Iain Colin Prentice
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 4.357

8.  Variation in climatic tolerance, but not stomatal traits, partially explains Pooideae grass species distributions.

Authors:  Aayudh Das; Anoob Prakash; Natalie Dedon; Alex Doty; Muniba Siddiqui; Jill C Preston
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 4.357

9.  Morning reduction of photosynthetic capacity before midday depression.

Authors:  Kohei Koyama; Shuhei Takemoto
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Plant water potential improves prediction of empirical stomatal models.

Authors:  William R L Anderegg; Adam Wolf; Adriana Arango-Velez; Brendan Choat; Daniel J Chmura; Steven Jansen; Thomas Kolb; Shan Li; Frederick Meinzer; Pilar Pita; Víctor Resco de Dios; John S Sperry; Brett T Wolfe; Stephen Pacala
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.