Literature DB >> 22760847

Advanced duodenal disease in familial adenomatous polyposis: how frequently should patients be followed up after successful therapy?

Damian C Balmforth1, Robin K S Phillips, Susan K Clark.   

Abstract

Duodenal polyposis is found in the majority of patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. Endoscopic surveillance programmes grade the severity of duodenal disease according to the Spigelman classification (stages 0-IV) to identify patients at risk of developing adenocarcinoma. To evaluate the progression of duodenal polyposis in patients with a previous diagnosis of Spigelman stage IV disease who have been downstaged by endoscopic or pharmacological means. A database search of a large polyposis registry identified patients who had been downstaged from stage IV disease and had further opportunity for disease progression. These patients were divided into three groups according to their new Spigelman stage. A measure of a patient's disease progression was obtained by the increase in stage over the recommended follow up time period for their new, reduced, Spigelman stage. Group 1 (n = 16) were downstaged to stage III disease, with 50 % progressing back to stage IV over the recommended 1-year follow up period. Group 2 (n = 19) were downstaged to stage II disease, with 84 % progressing over the recommended 3-year follow up period. Group 3 (n = 6) were downstaged to stage I disease, with 100 % progressing over the recommended 5-year follow up period. Patients downstaged from Spigelman stage IV demonstrate an increased rate of disease progression in comparison to reported rates of primary disease progression. An amendment to the current endoscopic surveillance protocol is recommended to ensure that once a patient has been diagnosed with stage IV disease they are treated as a high-risk patient in perpetuity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22760847     DOI: 10.1007/s10689-012-9546-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Cancer        ISSN: 1389-9600            Impact factor:   2.375


  12 in total

1.  Duodenal surveillance improves the prognosis after duodenal cancer in familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  S Bülow; I J Christensen; H Højen; J Björk; M Elmberg; H Järvinen; A Lepistö; M Nieuwenhuis; H Vasen
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.788

Review 2.  Prevention and management of duodenal polyps in familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  L A A Brosens; J J Keller; G J A Offerhaus; M Goggins; F M Giardiello
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Decision analysis in the management of duodenal adenomatosis in familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  H F Vasen; S Bülow; T Myrhøj; L Mathus-Vliegen; G Griffioen; E Buskens; B G Taal; F Nagengast; J F Slors; P de Ruiter
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Upper gastrointestinal cancer in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  A D Spigelman; C B Williams; I C Talbot; P Domizio; R K Phillips
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1989-09-30       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Life expectancy after colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis for familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  K P Nugent; A D Spigelman; R K Phillips
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 6.  Surveillance and management of upper gastrointestinal disease in Familial Adenomatous Polyposis.

Authors:  Michelle C Gallagher; Robin K S Phillips; Steffen Bulow
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.375

7.  Duodenal cancer in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP): results of a 10 year prospective study.

Authors:  C J Groves; B P Saunders; A D Spigelman; R K S Phillips
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  A randomised, double blind, placebo controlled study of celecoxib, a selective cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitor, on duodenal polyposis in familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  R K S Phillips; M H Wallace; P M Lynch; E Hawk; G B Gordon; B P Saunders; N Wakabayashi; Y Shen; S Zimmerman; L Godio; M Rodrigues-Bigas; L-K Su; J Sherman; G Kelloff; B Levin; G Steinbach
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  Pancreas-preserving total duodenectomy versus standard pancreatoduodenectomy for patients with familial adenomatous polyposis and polyps in the duodenum.

Authors:  S M M de Castro; C H J van Eijck; J P Rutten; C H Dejong; H van Goor; O R C Busch; D J Gouma
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Duodenal adenomatosis in familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  S Bülow; J Björk; I J Christensen; O Fausa; H Järvinen; F Moesgaard; H F A Vasen
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 23.059

View more
  4 in total

1.  Pancreas-sparing total duodenectomy for Spigelman stage IV duodenal polyposis associated with familial adenomatous polyposis: experience of 10 cases at a single institution.

Authors:  Yuichiro Watanabe; Hideyuki Ishida; Hiroyuki Baba; Takeo Iwama; Atsushi Kudo; Minoru Tanabe; Hideki Ishikawa
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.375

2.  "High rate of recurrent adenomatosis during endoscopic surveillance after duodenectomy in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis".

Authors:  Yasser A Alderlieste; Barbara A Bastiaansen; Elisabeth M H Mathus-Vliegen; Dirk J Gouma; Evelien Dekker
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 3.  Primary small bowel adenomas and adenocarcinomas-recent advances.

Authors:  Aoife Maguire; Kieran Sheahan
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 4.  Endoscopic management of duodenal adenomatosis in familial adenomatous polyposis-A case-based review.

Authors:  E Soons; T M Bisseling; M C A van Kouwen; G Möslein; P D Siersema
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 4.623

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.