Literature DB >> 22760303

A randomized equivalence trial to determine the optimum dose of iodine-131 for remnant ablation in differentiated thyroid cancer.

Chandrasekhar Bal1, Prem Chandra, Ajay Kumar, Sadanand Dwivedi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We conducted a stratified randomized equivalence/noninferiority trial from January 2001 to December 2006 to determine whether lower administered activities are as effective as 3.7 GBq (100 mCi) of iodine-131 (I) for remnant ablation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The sample size was found to be 450 on the basis of 80% power (α=5%) and noninferiority margin (δ=0.15). We used an allocation ratio of 2 : 2 : 1 for the 0.93, 1.85, and 3.7 GBq (25, 50, and 100 mCi) groups, respectively. Randomization with concealment was followed for patient group allocation. All patients underwent preablation I whole-body scan, 48-h radioiodine neck uptake measurements and post-therapeutic scans. The patients were advised suppressive L-thyroxine therapy (2 µg/kg/day). Repeat evaluation was performed after 6 months, along with thyroglobulin and antibody assays. The criteria for ablation were as follows: major criterion - negative I whole-body scan; minor criteria - 48-h radioiodine neck uptake less than or equal to 0.2% and stimulated thyroglobulin less than or equal to 10 ng/ml.
RESULTS: A total of 422 patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria (360 papillary and 62 follicular) could be recruited. As per AJCC, 6th ed., we had 70, 11, and 19% of patients in stage I, II, and III, respectively. First-dose ablation was 81.5, 84.9, 88.5, and 84.2% in the 0.93, 1.85, and 3.7 GBq groups and overall, respectively. Histology had no effect on ablation rate. The equivalence testing of the hypothesis was conducted between the 0.93 and 3.7 GBq groups, the 1.85 and 3.7 GBq groups, and the 0.93 and 1.85 GBq groups. Results showed that, at a significance level of 5%, the null hypothesis was rejected for each pair.
CONCLUSION: First-dose I ablation rates at 6 months with 0.93, 1.85, and 3.7 GBq of I are equivalent with the prespecified clinically acceptable noninferiority margin. We conclude that we are probably administering too much I for remnant ablation (trial registration number: CTRI/002291).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22760303     DOI: 10.1097/MNM.0b013e32835674af

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucl Med Commun        ISSN: 0143-3636            Impact factor:   1.690


  4 in total

Review 1.  Low versus high radioiodine activity to ablate the thyroid after thyroidectomy for cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Peizhun Du; Xuelong Jiao; Yanbing Zhou; Yu Li; Shan Kang; Dongfeng Zhang; Jizhun Zhang; Liang Lv; Rajan Patel
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2014-07-06       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 2.  Radioiodine therapy for patients with differentiated thyroid cancer after thyroidectomy: direct comparison and network meta-analyses.

Authors:  Y Fang; Y Ding; Q Guo; J Xing; Y Long; Z Zong
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 4.256

3.  Radioiodine remnant ablation in low-risk differentiated thyroid cancer patients who had R0 dissection is an over treatment.

Authors:  Chandrasekhar Bal; Sanjana Ballal; Ramya Soundararajan; Saurav Chopra; Aayushi Garg
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 4.452

Review 4.  Radioiodine Remnant Ablation: A Critical Review.

Authors:  Chandra Sekhar Bal; Ajit Kumar Padhy
Journal:  World J Nucl Med       Date:  2015 Sep-Dec
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.