Literature DB >> 22759475

Lichen sclerosus in patients with squamous cell carcinoma. Our experience with partial penectomy and reconstruction with ventral fenestrated flap.

Giovanni Alei1, Piero Letizia, Valentina Sorvillo, Lavinia Alei, Francesco Ricottilli, Nicolò Scuderi.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The vast majority of penile malignant tumors are squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs). After histological diagnosis of penile carcinoma, when possible, more conservative procedures are performed, otherwise it is necessary to perform a total penectomy.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ten patients, from 2006 to 2008, underwent to partial penectomy and reconstruction with ventral fenestrated flap technique; five of these patients had lichen sclerosus. All tumors were staged as T2N0M0, involving the corpus spongiosum and cavernosum. Patients were evaluated both the aesthetical and the sexual satisfaction, the first one by patient aesthetical self-assessment score, the second one by the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF). Patients underwent follow-up for forty months.
RESULTS: Of the ten patients, no one encountered severe complications. The average aesthetic satisfaction one month postoperatively was of 2 points, 40 months postoperatively it was of 3 points (scoring scale: 1= complete dissatisfaction, 5 = complete satisfaction). The average IIEF score in the preoperative period was 21.6 points, one month postoperatively it was 13 points, 40 months postoperatively it was 19.7 points (mild erectile dysfunction). DISCUSSION: The technique we presented, compared to other techniques, allows a reduction in operating time and is a one step technique without risk of non-engraftment. The ventral fenestrated flap technique did not result in metal stenosis in our ten patients series.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of a ventral fenestrated flap in the closure of the defect due to partial penectomy has numerous advantages. Aesthetics is highly accepted by patients who are satisfied and report satisfactory sexual activity despite the reduction in penis length.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22759475

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Ital Chir        ISSN: 0003-469X            Impact factor:   0.766


  5 in total

1.  [Urethral centralization and pseudo-glans formation after partial penectomy].

Authors:  J Kranz; A Parnham; M Albersen; V Sahdev; M Ziada; R Nigam; A Muneer; J Steffens; P Malone
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  Psychosocial impact of penile carcinoma.

Authors:  François Audenet; John P Sfakianos
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-10

Review 3.  The role of penectomy in penile cancer-evolving paradigms.

Authors:  Sarah O'Neill; Mitchell Barns; Filip Vujovic; Mikhail Lozinskiy
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-12

4.  Effects of partial penectomy for penile cancer on sexual function: A systematic review.

Authors:  Eleanor Whyte; Alexandra Sutcliffe; Philip Keegan; Tom Clifford; Jamie Matu; Oliver M Shannon; Alex Griffiths
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-22       Impact factor: 3.752

5.  Erectile function after partial penectomy for penile cancer.

Authors:  Leonardo L Monteiro; Rodrigo Skowronski; Fadi Brimo; Paulo da C Carvalho; Romulo A L Vasconcelos; Charley R C V Pacheco; Adriano A Calado; Wassim Kassouf
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2021 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.541

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.