Literature DB >> 22758595

Perioperative fluid therapy in elective colectomy in an enhanced recovery programme.

Sanket Srinivasa1, Simran P Singh, Arman Adam Kahokehr, Matthew H G Taylor, Andrew G Hill.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although intraoperative fluid restriction is thought to provide clinical benefits, it may not be suitable for patients with significant co-morbidities, who may ultimately require greater amounts of intravenous fluid (IVF) post-operatively. This study investigates whether intraoperative fluid restriction can be implemented uniformly in patients undergoing elective colectomy within an Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) protocol and investigates the association between fluid administration and clinical outcomes.
METHODS: A retrospective review of prospectively collected data was conducted for all patients who underwent elective colectomy from September 2006 to 2010 within our ERAS programme. Patients received intraoperative fluid restriction with post-operative fluid administered as per clinical indications. Demographic data, American Society of Anaesthesiology (ASA) status, IVF administered and clinical outcomes were recorded.
RESULTS: There were 227 patients (ASA 1: 47; ASA 2: 108; ASA 3: 72) with a median age of 71 years. Patients received a median of 2000 mL of crystalloid intraoperatively. There were no statistically significant differences between post-operative IVF amounts. Patients who experienced complications received significantly greater amounts of IVF post-operatively (5000 mL versus 2000 mL; P < 0.01) and post-operative IVF administration was the strongest predictor of complications in a logistic regression model. There was a trend suggesting higher median post-operative IVF prior to patients experiencing major complications (3000 mL versus 2000 mL; P= 0.07).
CONCLUSION: Intraoperative fluid restriction can be employed uniformly in ASA 1-3 patients undergoing colectomy. Post-operative administration of greater fluid volumes was associated with adverse outcomes.
© 2012 The Authors. ANZ Journal of Surgery © 2012 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22758595     DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2012.06122.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ANZ J Surg        ISSN: 1445-1433            Impact factor:   1.872


  4 in total

Review 1.  Factors predicting outcome from enhanced recovery programmes in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  David E Messenger; Nathan J Curtis; Adam Jones; Emma L Jones; Neil J Smart; Nader K Francis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Nonstrict and individual enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in partial hepatectomy.

Authors:  Xingwei Xu; Yingbin Wang; Tao Feng; Xin Zhao; Yannian Liao; Wu Ji; Jieshou Li
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-11-25

3.  Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between Chinese Patients Receiving Hepatectomy With or Without Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Strategy.

Authors:  Tieli Kang; Zhishuo Jia; Guoquan Xing; Quanhe Zhou
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2021-03-26

4.  Preoperative Enteral Nutritional Support in Patients Undergoing Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology Article.

Authors:  Hui Yao; Xiaojie Bian; Liang Mao; Xuejian Zi; Xiaopeng Yan; Yudong Qiu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.817

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.