Literature DB >> 22757970

Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Marcel Hruza1, Justo Lorenzo Bermejo, Bettina Flinspach, Michael Schulze, Dogu Teber, Hans Joachim Rumpelt, Jens Jochen Rassweiler.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP). To identify parameters influencing recurrence-free survival in a single-institution series. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients underwent LRP using the transperitoneal retrograde Heilbronn technique. High-risk patients received adjuvant treatment according to an institutional algorithm based on prostate-specific antigen (PSA), Gleason score, tumour-node-metastasis stage, margin status and tumour volume. Data were collected prospectively on operative and postoperative parameters beginning in 1999. Complete follow-up data of 370 of the first 500 consecutive patients are available. Biochemical recurrence was defined as two consecutive PSA levels <0.2 ng/mL within the follow-up period. Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox regression were applied to examine recurrence-free survival times.
RESULTS: The estimated biochemical recurrence-free survival (BCRFS) rates 10 years after LRP were 80.2% in patients staged pT2, 47.4% in those staged pT3a and 49.8% in those staged pT3b/4, confirming a better prognosis in patients with organ-confined disease (P < 0.001). In the multivariate Cox regression analysis, only Gleason score and pT stage significantly influenced BCRFS. The 10-year clinical progression-free survival rates were 97.2% (pT2), 84.4% (pT3a) and 78.1% (pT3b/4), and prostate cancer-specific survival estimates were 100% (pT2), 97.3% (pT3a) and 90.6% (pT3b/4).
CONCLUSIONS: The 10-year biochemical and clinical progression-free survival after LRP combined with a risk-adapted concept of adjuvant therapy is high, while prostate-cancer specific mortality is low. Our data shows no negative impact of laparoscopic techniques on oncologic outcomes compared to large series after retropubic radical prostatectomy. In a multivariate Cox regression, only Gleason score and pT stage had significant impact on BCRFS.
© 2012 BJU International.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22757970     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11317.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  10 in total

Review 1.  Surgical Management of Organ-Confined Prostate Cancer with Review of Literature and Evolving Evidence.

Authors:  Ahmed Saeed Goolam; Alfredo Harb-De la Rosa; Murugesan Manoharan
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-01-13

2.  The Prognostic Factors of Biochemical Recurrence-Free Survival Following Radical Prostatectomy

Authors:  Virote Chalieopanyarwong; Worapat Attawettayanon; Watid Kanchanawanichkul; Choosak Pripatnanont
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2017-09-27

Review 3.  [Laparascopic radical prostatectomy].

Authors:  R Ganzer; M Do; B P Rai; A Dietel; J-U Stolzenburg
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  Long-term oncological and functional results of extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: one surgical team's experience on 1,600 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Paolo Verze; Salvatore Scuzzarella; Giorgio R Martina; Pierluigi Giummelli; Federico Cantoni; Vincenzo Mirone
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-03-17       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Retropubic, laparoscopic and mini-laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a prospective assessment of patient scar satisfaction.

Authors:  Carmelo Quattrone; Antonio Cicione; Carlos Oliveira; Riccardo Autorino; Francesco Cantiello; Vincenzo Mirone; Marco De Sio; Luca Carrubbo; Rocco Damiano; Carlo Pavone; Estevão Lima
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-10-26       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Influence of family history on psychosocial distress and perceived need for treatment in prostate cancer survivors.

Authors:  Andreas Dinkel; Marielouise Kornmayer; Jürgen E Gschwend; Birgitt Marten-Mittag; Peter Herschbach; Kathleen Herkommer
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 7.  The comparative oncologic effectiveness of available management strategies for clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Mark D Tyson; David F Penson; Matthew J Resnick
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 3.498

8.  Prospective longitudinal outcomes of quality of life after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy compared with retropubic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Katsuyoshi Hashine; Toshio Kakuda; Shunsuke Iuchi; Tadanori Hosokawa; Iku Ninomiya
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 3.186

9.  Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy after radical resection of pT1-pT2 rectal cancer: a report of thirty cases.

Authors:  Zhuo Liu; Dechuan Li; Yinbo Chen
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 1.195

10.  Quality of life and functional outcomes 10 years after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Eugen Y-H Wang; Hans G Eriksson
Journal:  Ups J Med Sci       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 2.384

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.