Literature DB >> 22757957

Physical activity and cervical cancer testing among American Indian women.

Kyle J Muus1, Twyla B Baker-Demaray, T Andy Bogart, Glen E Duncan, Clemma Jacobsen, Dedra S Buchwald, Jeffrey A Henderson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Studies have shown that women who engage in high levels of physical activity have higher rates of cancer screening, including Papanicalaou (Pap) tests. Because American Indian (AI) women are at high risk for cervical cancer morbidity and mortality, we examined Pap screening prevalence and assessed whether physical activity was associated with screening adherence among AI women from 2 culturally distinct regions in the Northern Plains and the Southwest.
METHODS: A total of 1,979 AI women at least 18 years of age participating in a cross-sectional cohort study reported whether they received a Pap test within the previous 3 years. Physical activity level was expressed as total metabolic equivalent (MET) scores and grouped into quartiles. We used binary logistic regression to model the association of Pap testing and MET quartile, adjusting for demographic and health factors.
FINDINGS: Overall, 60% of women received a Pap test within the previous 3 years. After controlling for covariates, increased physical activity was associated with higher odds of Pap screening (OR = 1.1 per increase in MET quartile; 95% CI = 1.1, 1.2).
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to examine physical activity patterns and receipt of cancer screening in AIs. While recent Pap testing was more common among physically active AI women, prevalence was still quite low in all subgroups. Efforts are needed to increase awareness of the importance of cervical cancer screening among AI women.
© 2011 National Rural Health Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22757957      PMCID: PMC5590817          DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2011.00394.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rural Health        ISSN: 0890-765X            Impact factor:   4.333


  30 in total

1.  Cervical cancer screening among U.S. women: analyses of the 2000 National Health Interview Survey.

Authors:  Maria Hewitt; Susan S Devesa; Nancy Breen
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.018

2.  Obesity and physical inactivity in rural America.

Authors:  Paul Daniel Patterson; Charity G Moore; Janice C Probst; Judith Ann Shinogle
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.333

3.  Person and place: the compounding effects of race/ethnicity and rurality on health.

Authors:  Janice C Probst; Charity G Moore; Saundra H Glover; Michael E Samuels
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Bias associated with self-report of prior screening mammography.

Authors:  Kathleen A Cronin; Diana L Miglioretti; Martin Krapcho; Binbing Yu; Berta M Geller; Patricia A Carney; Tracy Onega; Eric J Feuer; Nancy Breen; Rachel Ballard-Barbash
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Colorectal cancer-screening tests and associated health behaviors.

Authors:  J A Shapiro; L C Seeff; M R Nadel
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.043

6.  Predictors of colorectal cancer screening participation in the United States.

Authors:  George N Ioannou; Michael K Chapko; Jason A Dominitz
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 10.864

7.  Variation in health services utilization among ethnic populations.

Authors:  Hude Quan; Andrew Fong; Carolyn De Coster; Jianli Wang; Richard Musto; Tom W Noseworthy; William A Ghali
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2006-03-14       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Cervical cancer screening: knowledge of own screening status among women aged 20-29 years.

Authors:  C Munk; S K Kjaer; P Poll; J E Bock
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.636

9.  A prospective cohort of American Indian and Alaska Native people: study design, methods, and implementation.

Authors:  M L Slattery; M C Schumacher; A P Lanier; S Edwards; R Edwards; M A Murtaugh; J Sandidge; G E Day; D Kaufman; S Kanekar; L Tom-Orme; J A Henderson
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2007-06-22       Impact factor: 4.897

10.  Nonadherence to breast and cervical cancer screening: what are the linkages to chronic disease risk?

Authors:  Steven S Coughlin; Robert J Uhler; H Irene Hall; Peter A Briss
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2003-12-15       Impact factor: 2.830

View more
  3 in total

1.  Impact of Physical Inactivity on Risk of Developing Cancer of the Uterine Cervix: A Case-Control Study.

Authors:  James Brian Szender; Rikki Cannioto; Nicolas R Gulati; Kristina L Schmitt; Grace Friel; Albina Minlikeeva; Alexis Platek; Emily H Gower; Ryan Nagy; Edgar Khachatryan; Paul C Mayor; Karin A Kasza; Shashikant B Lele; Kunle Odunsi; Kirsten B Moysich
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  Association of American Indian cultural identity with physical activity.

Authors:  Glen E Duncan; Casey L McDougall; Elizabeth Dansie; Eva Garroutte; Dedra Buchwald; Jeffrey A Henderson
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.847

3.  Physically fit with a higher cancer risk? Influences of cervical cancer screening among a sample of physically active women ages 21-49 living in the United States.

Authors:  A P Ewing; M A Alalwan; J A Brown; T E Adekunle; N D Korley; T C Nafiu; E C Coughlin; C P Parvanta; C D Meade; C K Gwede; A L Best
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2022-09-11
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.