Literature DB >> 22755425

Donor-specific anti-HLA antibody monitoring and removal in solid organ transplant recipients.

Matthew J Everly1.   

Abstract

Based on our knowledge that donor specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) are a major cause of allograft loss, determining how to monitor patients for DSA and how to treat them is important. Current published studies indicate that patients with preformed DSA differ from those without. Approximately 15-18 percent of transplant patients will have preformed DSA, which increases risk for early antibody mediated rejection (AMR) and allograft loss. The fact that nearly all AMR episodes occur in the first 1-2 months, coupled with the finding that a reduction in preformed DSA intensity within the first few weeks post-transplant decreases the risk of AMR, makes early testing important. It has also been shown that clearance of DSA at 6 months and 1 year can result in a decreased risk of transplant glomerulopathy and therefore, these times may be prime testing points. This monitoring schedule differs slightly from that of the patients who do not have performed DSA (i.e. low risk patients). Low risk patients who develop de novo DSA are most likely to do so in the first 6 months. However, more frequent sampling in the early months does not improve predictability of acute rejections in low risk patients and therefore, it is not as essential. Rather, testing at 6 months and then annually or biannually, would be beneficial, as it would serve to identify the 5 percent of new patients who develop DSA annually. Once these patients are identified, studies have shown that preemptive treatment to a goal of antibody clearance can be used to improve graft function and survival. In addition to screening for new DSA, monitoring for clearance of DSA along with histologic reversal of rejection in patients with AMR is important. In sum, there is substantial evidence suggesting that all patients need to have some monitoring for DSA to identify new onset of DSA or clearance of DSA. Additionally, in all DSA scenarios, treatment of persistent DSA is important, as it can lead to improved allograft survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22755425

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Transpl        ISSN: 0890-9016


  3 in total

1.  Reversing endogenous alloreactive B cell GC responses with anti-CD154 or CTLA-4Ig.

Authors:  J Chen; H Yin; J Xu; Q Wang; K L Edelblum; R Sciammas; A S Chong
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 8.086

2.  Complement-Binding Donor-Specific Anti-HLA Antibodies and Risk of Primary Graft Failure in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

Authors:  Stefan O Ciurea; Peter F Thall; Denái R Milton; Titus H Barnes; Piyanuch Kongtim; Yudith Carmazzi; Asdrúbal A López; Dianne Y Yap; Uday Popat; Gabriela Rondon; Benjamin Lichtiger; Fleur Aung; Vahid Afshar-Kharghan; Qing Ma; Marcelo Fernández-Viña; Richard E Champlin; Kai Cao
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Effect of donor-specific antibodies and panel reactive antibodies in living donor liver transplant recipients.

Authors:  Seung Hwan Song; Myoung Soo Kim; Jung Jun Lee; Man Ki Ju; Jae Geun Lee; Juhan Lee; Jin Sub Choi; Gi Hong Choi; Soon Il Kim; Dong Jin Joo
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 1.859

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.