Literature DB >> 22754801

Our experience with split electrode array implant for obliterated cochlea.

Milind V Kirtane, Yogesh I More, Gauri Mankekar, Nishita Mohandas, Rajesh Patadiya.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: To study the outcomes of split electrode array cochlear implantation in ossified cochlea using the CAP scoring system. Retrospective case study. Tertiary referral center. Six cochleae in three adult and three pediatric patients with ossification. INTERVENTION(S): All Patients underwent cochlear implantation with a split electrode array system. Major outcome parameter(s): Number of electrodes inserted during surgery, number of functioning electrodes on follow-up and auditory performance evaluation using the CAP score-Category of Auditory Perception [TSC Revised Version, based on Nottingham CI Program, 1995]. Six patients (three children and three adults) had insertion of split electrode array system. The mean number of electrodes inserted were 18.3 (range 15-21) and functioning electrodes at follow-up were mean of 14.3 (range 7-21). Auditory performance was measured using CAP score at 1 year post implant follow up, mean score in children was six and that in adult was eight. One pt had facial nerve twitching which was corrected by switching off the concerned electrode. No complications in sort of facial palsy or vestibular disorder were observed. Patients of ossified cochlea having profound deafness do well with split electrode array cochlear implantation as evaluated with CAP scoring system. The split electrode array results in more number of electrodes within the cochlear lumen. Retro graded apical array insertion has less chances of facial nerve stimulation as it is placed away from the nerve.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Category of auditory perception (CAP); Cochlear ossification; Split electrode array

Year:  2011        PMID: 22754801      PMCID: PMC3138962          DOI: 10.1007/s12070-011-0153-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 2231-3796


  18 in total

1.  The pathology of suppurative labyrinthitis.

Authors:  M M Paparella; S Sugiura
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1967-08       Impact factor: 1.547

2.  The development of auditory perception in children following cochlear implantation.

Authors:  T P Nikolopoulos; S M Archbold; G M O'Donoghue
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1999-10-05       Impact factor: 1.675

3.  Use of multichannel cochlear implants in obstructed and obliterated cochleas.

Authors:  B J Gantz; B F McCabe; R S Tyler
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 3.497

4.  Insertion depth of the Nucleus electrode array and relative performance.

Authors:  R Hartrampf; M C Dahm; R D Battmer; D Gnadeberg; A Strauss-Schier; U Rost; T Lenarz
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl       Date:  1995-09

Review 5.  Bacterial meningitis: an update.

Authors:  M M Shelton; W A Marks
Journal:  Neurol Clin       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 3.806

6.  Multichannel cochlear implantation in children with cochlear ossification.

Authors:  R L Steenerson; L B Gary
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1999-07

7.  Intact canal wall drill-out procedure for implantation of the totally ossified cochlea.

Authors:  T Balkany; M Luntz; F F Telischi; A V Hodges
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1997-11

8.  Cochlear ossification after meningitis.

Authors:  P R Axon; R H Temple; S R Saeed; R T Ramsden
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1998-11

9.  Clinical results with the Med-El compressed and split arrays in the United States.

Authors:  Paul W Bauer; Peter S Roland
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  Partial and double-array implantation of the ossified cochlea.

Authors:  J Thomas Roland; Daniel H Coelho; Harry Pantelides; Susan B Waltzman
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.311

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.