| Literature DB >> 22754321 |
Angela Rubio-Moraga1, David Candel-Perez2, Manuel E Lucas-Borja2, Pedro A Tiscar3, Benjamin Viñegla4, Juan C Linares5, Lourdes Gómez-Gómez1, Oussama Ahrazem1,6.
Abstract
Eight Pinus nigra Arn. populations from Southern Spain and Northern Morocco were examined using inter-simple sequence repeat markers to characterize the genetic variability amongst populations. Pair-wise population genetic distance ranged from 0.031 to 0.283, with a mean of 0.150 between populations. The highest inter-population average distance was between PaCU from Cuenca and YeCA from Cazorla, while the lowest distance was between TaMO from Morocco and MA Sierra Mágina populations. Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) and Nei's genetic diversity analyses revealed higher genetic variation within the same population than among different populations. Genetic differentiation (Gst) was 0.233. Cuenca showed the highest Nei's genetic diversity followed by the Moroccan region, Sierra Mágina, and Cazorla region. However, clustering of populations was not in accordance with their geographical locations. Principal component analysis showed the presence of two major groups-Group 1 contained all populations from Cuenca while Group 2 contained populations from Cazorla, Sierra Mágina and Morocco-while Bayesian analysis revealed the presence of three clusters. The low genetic diversity observed in PaCU and YeCA is probably a consequence of inappropriate management since no estimation of genetic variability was performed before the silvicultural treatments. Data indicates that the inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) method is sufficiently informative and powerful to assess genetic variability among populations of P. nigra.Entities:
Keywords: ISSR; Pinus nigra; genetic diversity; populations
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22754321 PMCID: PMC3382789 DOI: 10.3390/ijms13055645
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 6.208
Inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) primers and their sequences used in the present study.
| Primer Name | Sequence (5′-3′) | Tm (°C) |
|---|---|---|
| ISCS14 | AGTGAGTGAGTGAGTGAGTGA | 52 |
| ISCS17 | DBDBCACCACCACCACCAC | 62 |
| ISCS19 | HVHGTGGTGGTGGTGGTG | 62 |
| ISCS20 | DHBCGACGACGACGACGA | 62 |
| ISCS21 | BDBACAACAACAACAACA | 52 |
| ISCS34 | TGTGTGTGTGTGTGTGRC | 52 |
| ISCS41 | CTCCTCCTCCTCCTCCTC | 62 |
| ISCS69 | CACACACACACACACAA | 52 |
B: G + T + C; D: G + A + T; H: A + C + T; V: G + C + A.
Genetic diversity of Pinus nigra populations in this study.
| Population | PPL (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TrCU | 70.83 | 1.542 | 1.372 | 0.218 | 0.331 |
| ArCU | 79.17 | 1.625 | 1.410 | 0.242 | 0.366 |
| PaCU | 29.17 | 0.875 | 1.222 | 0.123 | 0.178 |
| TaMO | 54.17 | 1.208 | 1.368 | 0.207 | 0.303 |
| MA | 62.50 | 1.375 | 1.273 | 0.170 | 0.268 |
| PaCA | 29.17 | 0.875 | 1.239 | 0.130 | 0.185 |
| NaCA | 45.83 | 1.167 | 1.326 | 0.180 | 0.262 |
| YeCA | 37.50 | 1.083 | 1.228 | 0.133 | 0.199 |
| Mean | 51.04 | 1.219 | 1.305 | 0.175 | 0.262 |
PPL: percentage of polymorphic loci; n: number of Different Alleles; n: number of Effective Alleles; H: expected Heterozygosity; I: Shannon’s Index diversity.
Inter-population genetic distances calculated by Nei’s method. Above the diagonal are values of Nei’s unbiased genetic distances, those below the diagonal are Nei’s genetic distances. The underlined values are maximum or minimum genetic distances.
| TrCU | ArCU | PaCU | TaMO | MA | PaCA | NaCA | YeCA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | 0.079 | 0.249 | 0.223 | 0.252 | 0.244 | |||
| - | 0.057 | 0.115 | 0.113 | 0.158 | 0.196 | 0.187 | ||
| 0.087 | 0.065 | - | 0.168 | 0.171 | 0.176 | 0.230 | ||
| 0.258 | 0.124 | 0.181 | - | 0.111 | 0.121 | 0.116 | ||
| 0.120 | 0.183 | - | 0.121 | 0.161 | 0.177 | |||
| 0.233 | 0.168 | 0.191 | 0.126 | 0.134 | - | 0.118 | 0.143 | |
| 0.264 | 0.208 | 0.247 | 0.138 | 0.176 | 0.136 | - | 0.046 | |
| 0.254 | 0.198 | 0.131 | 0.191 | 0.160 | 0.064 | - |
Figure 1Principal component analysis (PCA) plot of the eight populations based on the first two principal axes (first axis = 51.63% and the second = 22.16%). Population names are abbreviated as in Table 4.
Figure 2The relationship between the log probability of the data and the number of clusters K using the ISSR data.
Figure 3STRUCTURE analysis of eight populations of Pinus nigra sampled to assess inter-simple sequence repeat markers. (A) K = 3 appeared to be the optimal number of clusters by showing the ΔK at its peak; (B) Results based on K = 3 using a Bayesian framework implemented in the STRUCTURE program across individuals from the studied populations.
Figure 4Relationship between genetic and geographic distances among the populations of Pinus nigra included in this study. The line is the regression fitted to the data. X-axis geographic distance in kilometers; Y-axis Nei’s genetic distance.
Sampling of accessions from different populations of P. nigra used in this study.
| Country, Locality | Site | Population Code | Elev. (m) | Longitude | Latitude | Mean Annual Temperature (°C) | Mean Annual Precipitation (mm) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spain, Cuenca (CU) | Tragacete | TrCU | 1641 | 1°47′22.68″W | 40°20′32.94″N | 50 | 7.54 | 1247 |
| Spain, Cuenca (CU) | Arcas | ArCU | 1099 | 2°04′04.38″W | 39°54′27.00″N | 50 | 10.94 | 735 |
| Spain, Cuenca (CU) | Palancares | PaCU | 1185 | 1°57′38.97″W | 40°00′28.86″N | 10 | 10.38 | 818 |
| Morocco, Talassemtane (MO) | Talassemtane | TaMO | 1710 | 5°08′26.63″W | 35°08′30.33″N | 10 | 9.86 | 1830 |
| Spain, Sierra Mágina (MA) | Sierra Mágina | MA | 1820 | 3°26′50.74″W | 37°42′44.96″N | 10 | 11.51 | 1128 |
| Spain, Cazorla (CA) | Palancares | PaCA | 1084 | 2°51′59.90″W | 38°06′8.25″N | 10 | 12.64 | 939 |
| Spain, Cazorla (CA) | Navaciazo | NaCA | 1400 | 2°51′43.84″W | 37°53′45.75″N | 10 | 10.45 | 1219 |
| Spain, Cazorla (CA) | Yelmo | YeCA | 1565 | 2°39′19.51″W | 38°14′56.97″N | 10 | 9.76 | 975 |
Elev.: elevation; n: number of samples in each population;
Data collected from local forestry departments.
Figure 5Geographic locations of populations sampled from Spain and Morocco. CU (Cuenca Mountains); CA (Cazorla Mountains); MA (Sierra Mágina); MO (Atlas Range).