OBJECTIVE: There is a bidirectional association between depression and cardiovascular disease. The neurobiological mechanisms underlying this association may involve an inability to cope with disrupted social bonds. This study investigated in an animal model the integration of depressive behaviors and cardiac dysfunction after a disrupted social bond and during an operational measure of depression, relative to the protective effects of intact social bonds. METHODS: Depressive behaviors in the forced swim test and continuous electrocardiographic parameters were measured in 14 adult, female socially monogamous prairie voles (rodents), after 4 weeks of social pairing or isolation. RESULTS: After social isolation, animals exhibited (all values are mean ± standard error of the mean; isolated versus paired, respectively) increased heart rate (416 ± 14 versus 370 ± 14 bpm, p < .05) and reduced heart rate variability (3.3 ± 0.2 versus 3.9 ± 0.2 ln(ms(2))). During the forced swim test, isolated animals exhibited greater helpless behavior (immobility = 106 ± 11 versus 63 ± 11 seconds, p < .05), increased heart rate (530 ± 22 versus 447 ± 15 bpm, p < .05), reduced heart rate variability (1.8 ± 0.4 versus 2.7 ± 0.2 ln(ms(2)), p < .05), and increased arrhythmias (arrhythmic burden score = 181 ± 46 versus 28 ± 12, p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The display of depressive behaviors during an operational measure of depression is coupled with increased heart rate, reduced heart rate variability, and increased arrhythmias, indicative of dysfunctional behavioral and physiological stress coping abilities as a function of social isolation. In contrast, social pairing with a sibling is behaviorally protective and cardioprotective. The present results can provide insight into a possible social mechanism underlying the association between depression and cardiovascular disease in humans.
OBJECTIVE: There is a bidirectional association between depression and cardiovascular disease. The neurobiological mechanisms underlying this association may involve an inability to cope with disrupted social bonds. This study investigated in an animal model the integration of depressive behaviors and cardiac dysfunction after a disrupted social bond and during an operational measure of depression, relative to the protective effects of intact social bonds. METHODS:Depressive behaviors in the forced swim test and continuous electrocardiographic parameters were measured in 14 adult, female socially monogamous prairie voles (rodents), after 4 weeks of social pairing or isolation. RESULTS: After social isolation, animals exhibited (all values are mean ± standard error of the mean; isolated versus paired, respectively) increased heart rate (416 ± 14 versus 370 ± 14 bpm, p < .05) and reduced heart rate variability (3.3 ± 0.2 versus 3.9 ± 0.2 ln(ms(2))). During the forced swim test, isolated animals exhibited greater helpless behavior (immobility = 106 ± 11 versus 63 ± 11 seconds, p < .05), increased heart rate (530 ± 22 versus 447 ± 15 bpm, p < .05), reduced heart rate variability (1.8 ± 0.4 versus 2.7 ± 0.2 ln(ms(2)), p < .05), and increased arrhythmias (arrhythmic burden score = 181 ± 46 versus 28 ± 12, p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The display of depressive behaviors during an operational measure of depression is coupled with increased heart rate, reduced heart rate variability, and increased arrhythmias, indicative of dysfunctional behavioral and physiological stress coping abilities as a function of social isolation. In contrast, social pairing with a sibling is behaviorally protective and cardioprotective. The present results can provide insight into a possible social mechanism underlying the association between depression and cardiovascular disease in humans.
Authors: Michelle S C Khoo; Jingdong Li; Madhu V Singh; Yingbo Yang; Prince Kannankeril; Yuejin Wu; Chad E Grueter; Xiaoqun Guan; Carmine V Oddis; Rong Zhang; Lisa Mendes; Gemin Ni; Ernest C Madu; Jinying Yang; Martha Bass; Rey J Gomez; Brian E Wadzinski; Eric N Olson; Roger J Colbran; Mark E Anderson Journal: Circulation Date: 2006-09-18 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Thomas Rutledge; Steven E Reis; Marian Olson; Jane Owens; Sheryl F Kelsey; Carl J Pepine; Sunil Mankad; William J Rogers; C Noel Bairey Merz; George Sopko; Carol E Cornell; Barry Sharaf; Karen A Matthews Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 2004 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 4.312
Authors: Oliver J Bosch; Hemanth P Nair; Todd H Ahern; Inga D Neumann; Larry J Young Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2008-10-15 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: C Sue Carter; Angela J Grippo; Hossein Pournajafi-Nazarloo; Michael G Ruscio; Stephen W Porges Journal: Prog Brain Res Date: 2008 Impact factor: 2.453
Authors: Lisa Ecklund-Flores; Michael M Myers; Catherine Monk; Albany Perez; Hein J Odendaal; William P Fifer Journal: Dev Psychobiol Date: 2017-04 Impact factor: 3.038
Authors: Amanda M Dossat; Marcos A Sanchez-Gonzalez; Andrew P Koutnik; Stefano Leitner; Edda L Ruiz; Brittany Griffin; Jens T Rosenberg; Samuel C Grant; Francis D Fincham; Jose R Pinto; Mohamed Kabbaj Journal: FASEB J Date: 2017-02-24 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Dimitri V Blondel; Gerard N Wallace; Stefanie Calderone; Marija Gorinshteyn; Colette M St Mary; Steven M Phelps Journal: Gen Comp Endocrinol Date: 2015-09-02 Impact factor: 2.822