Literature DB >> 22752816

Great apes infer others' goals based on context.

David Buttelmann1, Sebastian Schütte, Malinda Carpenter, Josep Call, Michael Tomasello.   

Abstract

In previous studies claiming to demonstrate that great apes understand the goals of others, the apes could potentially have been using subtle behavioral cues present during the test to succeed. In the current studies, we ruled out the use of such cues by making the behavior of the experimenter identical in the test phase of both the experimental and control conditions; the only difference was the preceding "context." In the first study, apes interpreted a human's ambiguous action as having the underlying goal of opening a box, or not, based on that human's previous actions with similar boxes. In the second study, chimpanzees learned that when a human stood up she was going to go get food for them, but when a novel, unexpected event happened, they changed their expectation-presumably based on their understanding that this new event led the human to change her goal. These studies suggest that great apes do not need concurrent behavioral cues to infer others' goals, but can do so from a variety of different types of cues-even cues displaced in time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22752816     DOI: 10.1007/s10071-012-0528-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Cogn        ISSN: 1435-9448            Impact factor:   3.084


  8 in total

1.  Social cognition and metacognition in great apes: a theory.

Authors:  Michael Tomasello
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 2.899

Review 2.  The evolutionary origins of syntax: Event cognition in nonhuman primates.

Authors:  Vanessa A D Wilson; Klaus Zuberbühler; Balthasar Bickel
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 14.957

3.  'Unwilling' versus 'unable': Tonkean macaques' understanding of human goal-directed actions.

Authors:  Charlotte Canteloup; Hélène Meunier
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  Great apes distinguish true from false beliefs in an interactive helping task.

Authors:  David Buttelmann; Frances Buttelmann; Malinda Carpenter; Josep Call; Michael Tomasello
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Inferential Communication: Bridging the Gap Between Intentional and Ostensive Communication in Non-human Primates.

Authors:  Elizabeth Warren; Josep Call
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-01-14

Review 6.  Infants' performance in the indirect false belief tasks: A second-person interpretation.

Authors:  Pamela Barone; Antoni Gomila
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci       Date:  2020-12-14

7.  Humans but Not Chimpanzees Vary Face-Scanning Patterns Depending on Contexts during Action Observation.

Authors:  Masako Myowa-Yamakoshi; Chisato Yoshida; Satoshi Hirata
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Just kidding: the evolutionary roots of playful teasing.

Authors:  Johanna Eckert; Sasha L Winkler; Erica A Cartmill
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 3.703

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.