Literature DB >> 22752375

Ki-67 is a prognostic biomarker of survival after radiofrequency ablation of liver malignancies.

Constantinos T Sofocleous1, Sandeep Garg, Lydia M Petrovic, Mithat Gonen, Elena N Petre, David S Klimstra, Stephen B Solomon, Karen T Brown, Lynn A Brody, Ann M Covey, Ronald P Dematteo, Lawrence Schwartz, Nancy E Kemeny.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the predictive value of examinations of tissue adherent to multitined electrodes on local tumor progression-free survival (LPFS) and overall survival (OS) after liver tumor radiofrequency ablation (RFA).
METHODS: An institutional review board-approved, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant review identified 68 liver tumors treated with RFA in 63 patients with at least 3 years' follow-up. Tissue adherent to the electrode after liver tumor RFA was evaluated with proliferation (Ki-67) and apoptotic (caspase-3) markers. LPFS and OS were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier methodology and the log-rank test. Multivariate analysis assessed the effect of tumor size, pathology, and post-RFA tissue characteristics on LPFS and OS.
RESULTS: Post-RFA tissue examination classified 55 of the 68 tumors as completely ablated with coagulation necrosis, with cells positive for caspase-3 and negative for Ki-67 (CN). Thirteen had viable Ki-67-positive tumor cells. Mean liver tumor size was larger in the viable (V) group versus the CN group (3.4 vs. 2.5 cm, respectively; P = .017). For the V and CN groups, respectively, local tumor progression occurred in 12 (92 %) of 13 and 23 (42 %) of 55 specimens. One, 3-, and 5-year LPFS was 8 %, 8 %, and 8 %, and 79 %, 47 %, and 47 % (P < .001) for the V and CN groups, respectively. During a 63-month median follow-up, 92 % of patients in the V group and 58 % in the CN group died, resulting in 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS of 92 %, 25 %, and 8 % vs. 92 %, 59 %, and 33 % (P = .032), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Ki-67-positive tumor cells on the electrode after liver tumor RFA is an independent predictor of LPFS and OS. Size, initially thought to be an independent risk factor for local tumor progression in tumors 3-5 cm, does not hold its significance at long follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22752375      PMCID: PMC4122119          DOI: 10.1245/s10434-012-2461-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  42 in total

Review 1.  Image-guided tumor ablation: standardization of terminology and reporting criteria.

Authors:  S Nahum Goldberg; Clement J Grassi; John F Cardella; J William Charboneau; Gerald D Dodd; Damian E Dupuy; Debra Gervais; Alice R Gillams; Robert A Kane; Fred T Lee; Tito Livraghi; John McGahan; David A Phillips; Hyunchul Rhim; Stuart G Silverman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-04-21       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Radio-frequency ablation of liver tumors: assessment of therapeutic response and complications.

Authors:  H Choi; E M Loyer; R A DuBrow; H Kaur; C L David; S Huang; S Curley; C Charnsangavej
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 3.  Radiofrequency ablation of primary and metastatic liver tumors.

Authors:  Steven A Curley; Francesco Izzo
Journal:  Surg Technol Int       Date:  2002-09

4.  Laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation of primary and metastatic liver tumors. Technical considerations.

Authors:  A Siperstein; A Garland; K Engle; S Rogers; E Berber; A String; A Foroutani; T Ryan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Prognostic value of proliferation, apoptosis, defective DNA mismatch repair, and p53 overexpression in patients with resected Dukes' B2 or C colon cancer: a North Central Cancer Treatment Group Study.

Authors:  Megan M Garrity; Lawrence J Burgart; Michelle R Mahoney; Harold E Windschitl; Muhammad Salim; Martin Wiesenfeld; James E Krook; John C Michalak; Richard M Goldberg; Michael J O'Connell; Alfred F Furth; Daniel J Sargent; Linda M Murphy; Eunice Hill; Darren L Riehle; Cecelia H Meyers; Thomas E Witzig
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-05-01       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Radiofrequency ablation in the management of liver metastases from breast cancer.

Authors:  C T Sofocleous; R G Nascimento; M Gonen; M Theodoulou; A M Covey; L A Brody; S M Solomon; R Thornton; Y Fong; G I Getrajdman; K T Brown
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of colorectal hepatic metastases - initial experience. An adjunct technique to systemic chemotherapy for those with inoperable colorectal hepatic metastases.

Authors:  T J White; S H Roy-Choudhury; D J Breen; J Cast; A Maraveyas; E F Smyth; J E Hartley; J R T Monson
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2004-09-13       Impact factor: 2.588

8.  Treatment of focal liver tumors with percutaneous radio-frequency ablation: complications encountered in a multicenter study.

Authors:  Tito Livraghi; Luigi Solbiati; M Franca Meloni; G Scott Gazelle; Elkan F Halpern; S Nahum Goldberg
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Locoregional recurrences are frequent after radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Lawrence E Harrison; Baburao Koneru; Phil Baramipour; Adrian Fisher; Alison Barone; Dorian Wilson; Andrew Dela Torre; Kyunghee C Cho; Daniel Contractor; Maria Korogodsky
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 6.113

10.  Prognostic significance of MCM2, Ki-67 and gelsolin in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Jun Yang; Nithya Ramnath; Kirsten B Moysich; Harold L Asch; Helen Swede; Sadir J Alrawi; Joel Huberman; Joseph Geradts; John S J Brooks; Dongfeng Tan
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 4.430

View more
  29 in total

1.  Micropapillary and/or Solid Histologic Subtype Based on Pre-Treatment Biopsy Predicts Local Recurrence After Thermal Ablation of Lung Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Song Gao; Seth Stein; Elena N Petre; Waleed Shady; Jeremy C Durack; Carole Ridge; Prasad Adusumilli; Natasha Rekhtman; Stephen B Solomon; Etay Ziv
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 2.  Clinicopathological and prognostic significance of high Ki-67 labeling index in hepatocellular carcinoma patients: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yihuan Luo; Fanghui Ren; Yongru Liu; Zhenhong Shi; Zhong Tan; Huojie Xiong; Yiwu Dang; Gang Chen
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-07-15

3.  Margin size is an independent predictor of local tumor progression after ablation of colon cancer liver metastases.

Authors:  Xiaodong Wang; Constantinos T Sofocleous; Joseph P Erinjeri; Elena N Petre; Mithat Gonen; Kinh G Do; Karen T Brown; Anne M Covey; Lynn A Brody; William Alago; Raymond H Thornton; Nancy E Kemeny; Stephen B Solomon
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 4.  Thermal Ablation in the Management of Colorectal Cancer Patients with Oligometastatic Liver Disease.

Authors:  Elena Nadia Petre; Constantinos Sofocleous
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2017-02-03

5.  18F-FDG PET/CT Is an Immediate Imaging Biomarker of Treatment Success After Liver Metastasis Ablation.

Authors:  Francois Cornelis; Vlasios Sotirchos; Elena Violari; Constantinos T Sofocleous; Heiko Schoder; Jeremy C Durack; Robert H Siegelbaum; Majid Maybody; John Humm; Stephen B Solomon
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Fluorescent Tissue Assessment of Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases Ablation Zone: A Potential Real-Time Biomarker of Complete Tumor Ablation.

Authors:  Vlasios S Sotirchos; Sho Fujisawa; Efsevia Vakiani; Stephen B Solomon; Katia O Manova-Todorova; Constantinos T Sofocleous
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Hepatic Thermal Ablation: Effect of Device and Heating Parameters on Local Tissue Reactions and Distant Tumor Growth.

Authors:  Erik Velez; S Nahum Goldberg; Gaurav Kumar; Yuanguo Wang; Svetlana Gourevitch; Jacob Sosna; Tyler Moon; Christopher L Brace; Muneeb Ahmed
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Thermal Ablation Induces Transitory Metastatic Growth by Means of the STAT3/c-Met Molecular Pathway in an Intrahepatic Colorectal Cancer Mouse Model.

Authors:  Haixing Liao; Muneeb Ahmed; Aurelia Markezana; Guohua Zeng; Matthias Stechele; Eithan Galun; S Nahum Goldberg
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Immediate Postablation 18F-FDG Injection and Corresponding SUV Are Surrogate Biomarkers of Local Tumor Progression After Thermal Ablation of Colorectal Carcinoma Liver Metastases.

Authors:  Francois H Cornelis; Elena N Petre; Efsevia Vakiani; David Klimstra; Jeremy C Durack; Mithat Gonen; Joseph Osborne; Stephen B Solomon; Constantinos T Sofocleous
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  Multimodality imaging to assess immediate response to irreversible electroporation in a rat liver tumor model.

Authors:  Yue Zhang; Sarah B White; Jodi R Nicolai; Zhuoli Zhang; Derek L West; Dong-Hyun Kim; A Lee Goodwin; Frank H Miller; Reed A Omary; Andrew C Larson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 11.105

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.