PURPOSE: To assess the predictive value of examinations of tissue adherent to multitined electrodes on local tumor progression-free survival (LPFS) and overall survival (OS) after liver tumor radiofrequency ablation (RFA). METHODS: An institutional review board-approved, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant review identified 68 liver tumors treated with RFA in 63 patients with at least 3 years' follow-up. Tissue adherent to the electrode after liver tumor RFA was evaluated with proliferation (Ki-67) and apoptotic (caspase-3) markers. LPFS and OS were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier methodology and the log-rank test. Multivariate analysis assessed the effect of tumor size, pathology, and post-RFA tissue characteristics on LPFS and OS. RESULTS: Post-RFA tissue examination classified 55 of the 68 tumors as completely ablated with coagulation necrosis, with cells positive for caspase-3 and negative for Ki-67 (CN). Thirteen had viable Ki-67-positive tumor cells. Mean liver tumor size was larger in the viable (V) group versus the CN group (3.4 vs. 2.5 cm, respectively; P = .017). For the V and CN groups, respectively, local tumor progression occurred in 12 (92 %) of 13 and 23 (42 %) of 55 specimens. One, 3-, and 5-year LPFS was 8 %, 8 %, and 8 %, and 79 %, 47 %, and 47 % (P < .001) for the V and CN groups, respectively. During a 63-month median follow-up, 92 % of patients in the V group and 58 % in the CN group died, resulting in 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS of 92 %, 25 %, and 8 % vs. 92 %, 59 %, and 33 % (P = .032), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Ki-67-positive tumor cells on the electrode after liver tumor RFA is an independent predictor of LPFS and OS. Size, initially thought to be an independent risk factor for local tumor progression in tumors 3-5 cm, does not hold its significance at long follow-up.
PURPOSE: To assess the predictive value of examinations of tissue adherent to multitined electrodes on local tumor progression-free survival (LPFS) and overall survival (OS) after liver tumor radiofrequency ablation (RFA). METHODS: An institutional review board-approved, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant review identified 68 liver tumors treated with RFA in 63 patients with at least 3 years' follow-up. Tissue adherent to the electrode after liver tumor RFA was evaluated with proliferation (Ki-67) and apoptotic (caspase-3) markers. LPFS and OS were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier methodology and the log-rank test. Multivariate analysis assessed the effect of tumor size, pathology, and post-RFA tissue characteristics on LPFS and OS. RESULTS: Post-RFA tissue examination classified 55 of the 68 tumors as completely ablated with coagulation necrosis, with cells positive for caspase-3 and negative for Ki-67 (CN). Thirteen had viable Ki-67-positive tumor cells. Mean liver tumor size was larger in the viable (V) group versus the CN group (3.4 vs. 2.5 cm, respectively; P = .017). For the V and CN groups, respectively, local tumor progression occurred in 12 (92 %) of 13 and 23 (42 %) of 55 specimens. One, 3-, and 5-year LPFS was 8 %, 8 %, and 8 %, and 79 %, 47 %, and 47 % (P < .001) for the V and CN groups, respectively. During a 63-month median follow-up, 92 % of patients in the V group and 58 % in the CN group died, resulting in 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS of 92 %, 25 %, and 8 % vs. 92 %, 59 %, and 33 % (P = .032), respectively. CONCLUSIONS:Ki-67-positive tumor cells on the electrode after liver tumor RFA is an independent predictor of LPFS and OS. Size, initially thought to be an independent risk factor for local tumor progression in tumors 3-5 cm, does not hold its significance at long follow-up.
Authors: S Nahum Goldberg; Clement J Grassi; John F Cardella; J William Charboneau; Gerald D Dodd; Damian E Dupuy; Debra Gervais; Alice R Gillams; Robert A Kane; Fred T Lee; Tito Livraghi; John McGahan; David A Phillips; Hyunchul Rhim; Stuart G Silverman Journal: Radiology Date: 2005-04-21 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: H Choi; E M Loyer; R A DuBrow; H Kaur; C L David; S Huang; S Curley; C Charnsangavej Journal: Radiographics Date: 2001-10 Impact factor: 5.333
Authors: Megan M Garrity; Lawrence J Burgart; Michelle R Mahoney; Harold E Windschitl; Muhammad Salim; Martin Wiesenfeld; James E Krook; John C Michalak; Richard M Goldberg; Michael J O'Connell; Alfred F Furth; Daniel J Sargent; Linda M Murphy; Eunice Hill; Darren L Riehle; Cecelia H Meyers; Thomas E Witzig Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2004-05-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: C T Sofocleous; R G Nascimento; M Gonen; M Theodoulou; A M Covey; L A Brody; S M Solomon; R Thornton; Y Fong; G I Getrajdman; K T Brown Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: T J White; S H Roy-Choudhury; D J Breen; J Cast; A Maraveyas; E F Smyth; J E Hartley; J R T Monson Journal: Dig Surg Date: 2004-09-13 Impact factor: 2.588
Authors: Tito Livraghi; Luigi Solbiati; M Franca Meloni; G Scott Gazelle; Elkan F Halpern; S Nahum Goldberg Journal: Radiology Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Lawrence E Harrison; Baburao Koneru; Phil Baramipour; Adrian Fisher; Alison Barone; Dorian Wilson; Andrew Dela Torre; Kyunghee C Cho; Daniel Contractor; Maria Korogodsky Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Jun Yang; Nithya Ramnath; Kirsten B Moysich; Harold L Asch; Helen Swede; Sadir J Alrawi; Joel Huberman; Joseph Geradts; John S J Brooks; Dongfeng Tan Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2006-08-01 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Song Gao; Seth Stein; Elena N Petre; Waleed Shady; Jeremy C Durack; Carole Ridge; Prasad Adusumilli; Natasha Rekhtman; Stephen B Solomon; Etay Ziv Journal: Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol Date: 2017-08-02 Impact factor: 2.740
Authors: Xiaodong Wang; Constantinos T Sofocleous; Joseph P Erinjeri; Elena N Petre; Mithat Gonen; Kinh G Do; Karen T Brown; Anne M Covey; Lynn A Brody; William Alago; Raymond H Thornton; Nancy E Kemeny; Stephen B Solomon Journal: Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol Date: 2012-04-26 Impact factor: 2.740
Authors: Francois Cornelis; Vlasios Sotirchos; Elena Violari; Constantinos T Sofocleous; Heiko Schoder; Jeremy C Durack; Robert H Siegelbaum; Majid Maybody; John Humm; Stephen B Solomon Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2016-02-23 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Vlasios S Sotirchos; Sho Fujisawa; Efsevia Vakiani; Stephen B Solomon; Katia O Manova-Todorova; Constantinos T Sofocleous Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2019-03-04 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Erik Velez; S Nahum Goldberg; Gaurav Kumar; Yuanguo Wang; Svetlana Gourevitch; Jacob Sosna; Tyler Moon; Christopher L Brace; Muneeb Ahmed Journal: Radiology Date: 2016-07-13 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Francois H Cornelis; Elena N Petre; Efsevia Vakiani; David Klimstra; Jeremy C Durack; Mithat Gonen; Joseph Osborne; Stephen B Solomon; Constantinos T Sofocleous Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2018-02-09 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Yue Zhang; Sarah B White; Jodi R Nicolai; Zhuoli Zhang; Derek L West; Dong-Hyun Kim; A Lee Goodwin; Frank H Miller; Reed A Omary; Andrew C Larson Journal: Radiology Date: 2014-02-18 Impact factor: 11.105