Literature DB >> 22752212

Microfragmentation concept explains non-positive environmental heterogeneity-diversity relationships.

Lauri Laanisto1, Riin Tamme, Inga Hiiesalu, Robert Szava-Kovats, Antonio Gazol, Meelis Pärtel.   

Abstract

Although recent studies have revealed that the relationship between diversity and environmental heterogeneity is not always positive, as classical niche theory predicts, scientists have had difficulty interpreting these results from an ecological perspective. We propose a new concept-microfragmentation-to explain how small-scale heterogeneity can have neutral or even negative effect on species diversity. We define microfragmentation as a community level process of splitting habitat into a more heterogeneous environment that can have non-positive effects on the diversity through habitat loss and subsequent isolation. We provide support for the microfragmentation concept with results from spatially explicit heterogeneity-diversity model simulations, in which varying sets of species (with different ratios of specialist and generalist species) were modeled at different levels of configurational heterogeneity (meaning that only the habitat structure was changed, not its composition). Our results indicate that environmental heterogeneity can affect community diversity in the same way as fragmentation at the landscape level. Although generalist species might not be seriously affected by microfragmentation, the persistence of specialist species can be seriously disturbed by small-scale patchiness. The microfragmentation concept provides new insight into community level diversity dynamics and can influence conservation and management strategies.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22752212     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-012-2398-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  12 in total

1.  A heterogeneity of heterogeneities.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 17.712

2.  Predicting the risk of extinction from shared ecological characteristics.

Authors:  Janne S Kotiaho; Veijo Kaitala; Atte Komonen; Jussi Päivinen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-01-25       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Slow response of plant species richness to habitat loss and fragmentation.

Authors:  Aveliina Helm; Ilkka Hanski; Meelis Pärtel
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 9.492

4.  Integrating the effects of area, isolation, and habitat heterogeneity on species diversity: a unification of island biogeography and niche theory.

Authors:  Ronen Kadmon; Omri Allouche
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2007-07-16       Impact factor: 3.926

5.  Island species richness increases with habitat diversity.

Authors:  Joaquín Hortal; Kostas A Triantis; Shai Meiri; Elisa Thébault; Spyros Sfenthourakis
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.926

6.  A general framework for neutral models of community dynamics.

Authors:  Omri Allouche; Ronen Kadmon
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 9.492

7.  EVOLUTION OF GENERALISTS AND SPECIALISTS IN SPATIALLY HETEROGENEOUS ENVIRONMENTS.

Authors:  Peter H Van Tienderen
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Spatial niches and coexistence: testing theory with tarweeds.

Authors:  Susan Harrison; Howard Cornell; Kara A Moore
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 5.499

9.  Turbulent dispersal promotes species coexistence.

Authors:  Heather A Berkley; Bruce E Kendall; Satoshi Mitarai; David A Siegel
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 9.492

10.  Plant community responses to resource availability and heterogeneity during restoration.

Authors:  S G Baer; J M Blair; S L Collins; A K Knapp
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2004-04-07       Impact factor: 3.225

View more
  8 in total

1.  A negative heterogeneity-diversity relationship found in experimental grassland communities.

Authors:  Antonio Gazol; Riin Tamme; Jodi N Price; Inga Hiiesalu; Lauri Laanisto; Meelis Pärtel
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  An experimental test of the area-heterogeneity tradeoff.

Authors:  Eyal Ben-Hur; Ronen Kadmon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Spatial coherence and the persistence of high diversity in spatially heterogeneous landscapes.

Authors:  Ankit Vikrant; Susanne Pettersson; Martin Nilsson Jacobi
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 3.167

4.  Spatial diversity patterns of Pristimantis frogs in the Tropical Andes.

Authors:  Fabio Leonardo Meza-Joya; Mauricio Torres
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Dispersal increases ecological selection by increasing effective community size.

Authors:  Ronen Ron; Ori Fragman-Sapir; Ronen Kadmon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Soil resource availability is much more important than soil resource heterogeneity in determining the species diversity and abundance of karst plant communities.

Authors:  Yuan Liu; Wenchao Qi; Danni He; Yunrong Xiang; Jinchun Liu; Huimin Huang; Miao Chen; Jianping Tao
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Distance decay 2.0 - A global synthesis of taxonomic and functional turnover in ecological communities.

Authors:  Caio Graco-Roza; Sonja Aarnio; Nerea Abrego; Alicia T R Acosta; Janne Alahuhta; Jan Altman; Claudia Angiolini; Jukka Aroviita; Fabio Attorre; Lars Baastrup-Spohr; José J Barrera-Alba; Jonathan Belmaker; Idoia Biurrun; Gianmaria Bonari; Helge Bruelheide; Sabina Burrascano; Marta Carboni; Pedro Cardoso; José C Carvalho; Giuseppe Castaldelli; Morten Christensen; Gilsineia Correa; Iwona Dembicz; Jürgen Dengler; Jiri Dolezal; Patricia Domingos; Tibor Erös; Carlos E L Ferreira; Goffredo Filibeck; Sergio R Floeter; Alan M Friedlander; Johanna Gammal; Anna Gavioli; Martin M Gossner; Itai Granot; Riccardo Guarino; Camilla Gustafsson; Brian Hayden; Siwen He; Jacob Heilmann-Clausen; Jani Heino; John T Hunter; Vera L M Huszar; Monika Janišová; Jenny Jyrkänkallio-Mikkola; Kimmo K Kahilainen; Julia Kemppinen; Łukasz Kozub; Carla Kruk; Michel Kulbiki; Anna Kuzemko; Peter Christiaan le Roux; Aleksi Lehikoinen; Domênica Teixeira de Lima; Angel Lopez-Urrutia; Balázs A Lukács; Miska Luoto; Stefano Mammola; Marcelo M Marinho; Luciana S Menezes; Marco Milardi; Marcela Miranda; Gleyci A O Moser; Joerg Mueller; Pekka Niittynen; Alf Norkko; Arkadiusz Nowak; Jean P Ometto; Otso Ovaskainen; Gerhard E Overbeck; Felipe S Pacheco; Virpi Pajunen; Salza Palpurina; Félix Picazo; Juan A C Prieto; Iván F Rodil; Francesco M Sabatini; Shira Salingré; Michele De Sanctis; Angel M Segura; Lucia H S da Silva; Zora D Stevanovic; Grzegorz Swacha; Anette Teittinen; Kimmo T Tolonen; Ioannis Tsiripidis; Leena Virta; Beixin Wang; Jianjun Wang; Wolfgang Weisser; Yuan Xu; Janne Soininen
Journal:  Glob Ecol Biogeogr       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 6.909

8.  The effect of environmental heterogeneity on species richness depends on community position along the environmental gradient.

Authors:  Zhiyong Yang; Xueqi Liu; Mohua Zhou; Dexiecuo Ai; Gang Wang; Youshi Wang; Chengjin Chu; Jeremy T Lundholm
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.