Literature DB >> 22752145

Correlation of EGFR, IDH1 and PTEN status with the outcome of patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated in a phase II clinical trial with the EGFR-blocking monoclonal antibody cetuximab.

Shasha Lv1, Erik Teugels, Jan Sadones, Sylvia De Brakeleer, Johnny Duerinck, Stephanie Du Four, Alex Michotte, Jacques De Grève, Bart Neyns.   

Abstract

Mutation and gene amplification of the epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR) is one of the most common genetic alterations in glioblastoma (GB). EGFR is, therefore, an attractive molecular target for the treatment of GB. EGFR-targeted therapies however have been largely ineffective in clinical trials. In this study, we investigated the correlation between the EGFR gene amplification status, expression of the EGFR variant III (EGFRvIII) and EGFR variant IV (EGFRvIV) mutations, expression of the phosphatase and tensin homologue gene on chromosome 10 (PTEN) and mutation of the isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) gene and the survival of patients suffering from recurrent glioblastoma who were treated with the EGFR-targeted monoclonal antibody cetuximab in a prospective phase II clinical trial. EGFR amplification was detected in 19 out of 35 GB (54%), EGFRvIII expression in 11 (31.4%) and EGFRvIV expression in 7 (20%). The EGFRvIII and EGFRvIV mutations were exclusively found in GB with EGFR amplification and were almost mutually exclusive with IDH1 mutation (EGFRvIII mutation was found in 1 out of 11 GB with an IDH1 mutation). Patients with an EGFR amplification lacking EGFRvIII expression had a significantly superior progression free survival (PFS) and a numerical better overall survival (OS) following treatment with cetuximab [median PFS 3.03 vs. 1.63 months (p=0.006); median OS 5.57 vs. 3.97 months (p=0.12)]. Within the subgroup of patients with EGFR amplification, patients with EGFRvIII positive glioblastoma had a worse survival [median PFS 1.63 vs. 3.03 months (p=0.01); median OS 3.27 vs. 5.57 months (p=0.08)]. Our observations indicate that the type of EGFR mutation may determine the outcome of GB patients treated with cetuximab. Prospective investigation of both the EGFR amplification and mutation status in clinical trials with EGFR-targeted therapies for GB is indicated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22752145     DOI: 10.3892/ijo.2012.1539

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oncol        ISSN: 1019-6439            Impact factor:   5.650


  25 in total

Review 1.  Targeted molecular therapies against epidermal growth factor receptor: past experiences and challenges.

Authors:  David A Reardon; Patrick Y Wen; Ingo K Mellinghoff
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 2.  Prioritization schema for immunotherapy clinical trials in glioblastoma.

Authors:  Tiffany R Hodges; Sherise D Ferguson; Hillary G Caruso; Gary Kohanbash; Shouhao Zhou; Timothy F Cloughesy; Mitchel S Berger; George H Poste; Mustafa Khasraw; Sujuan Ba; Tao Jiang; Tom Mikkelson; W K Alfred Yung; John F de Groot; Howard Fine; Lewis C Cantley; Ingo K Mellinghoff; Duane A Mitchell; Hideho Okada; Amy B Heimberger
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 8.110

3.  Reduced PTEN expression and overexpression of miR-17-5p, -19a-3p, -19b-3p, -21-5p, -130b-3p, -221-3p and -222-3p by glioblastoma stem-like cells following irradiation.

Authors:  Takatoshi Tokudome; Akiko Sasaki; Mayumi Tsuji; Yuko Udaka; Hideto Oyamada; Hiromichi Tsuchiya; Katsuji Oguchi
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 4.  Molecularly targeted therapies for recurrent glioblastoma: current and future targets.

Authors:  Darryl Lau; Stephen T Magill; Manish K Aghi
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.047

5.  Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) amplification rates observed in screening patients for randomized trials in glioblastoma.

Authors:  Andrew B Lassman; Kenneth D Aldape; Peter J Ansell; Earle Bain; Walter J Curran; Marica Eoli; Pim J French; Manabu Kinoshita; Jim Looman; Minesh Mehta; Yoshihiro Muragaki; Yoshitaka Narita; Christopher Ocampo; Lisa Roberts-Rapp; Minghao Song; Michael A Vogelbaum; Annemiek M E Walenkamp; Tony J C Wang; Peixin Zhang; Martin J van den Bent
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2019-07-04       Impact factor: 4.130

6.  Congress of neurological surgeons systematic review and evidence-based guidelines update on the role of neuropathology in the management of progressive glioblastoma in adults.

Authors:  Abigail L Goodman; José E Velázquez Vega; Chad Glenn; Jeffrey J Olson
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 7.  Glioblastoma targeted therapy: updated approaches from recent biological insights.

Authors:  M Touat; A Idbaih; M Sanson; K L Ligon
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 32.976

8.  Radiological features combined with IDH1 status for predicting the survival outcome of glioblastoma patients.

Authors:  Kai Wang; Yinyan Wang; Xing Fan; Jiangfei Wang; Guilin Li; Jieling Ma; Jun Ma; Tao Jiang; Jianping Dai
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 9.  Antibody-drug conjugates in glioblastoma therapy: the right drugs to the right cells.

Authors:  Hui K Gan; Martin van den Bent; Andrew B Lassman; David A Reardon; Andrew M Scott
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 66.675

10.  Identifying radiographic specificity for phosphatase and tensin homolog and epidermal growth factor receptor changes: a quantitative analysis of glioblastomas.

Authors:  Yinyan Wang; Xing Fan; Chuanbao Zhang; Tan Zhang; Xiaoxia Peng; Tianyi Qian; Jun Ma; Lei Wang; Shaowu Li; Tao Jiang
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 2.804

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.