Literature DB >> 22751489

Peritraumatic distress after an earthquake: a bridge between neuroimaging and epidemiology.

D Nishi, Y Matsuoka.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22751489      PMCID: PMC3690419          DOI: 10.1038/mp.2012.94

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Psychiatry        ISSN: 1359-4184            Impact factor:   15.992


× No keyword cloud information.
Sekiguchi et al.[1] demonstrated in a neuroimaging study that survivors of the Great East Japan Earthquake who had a smaller anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) volume before the earthquake and survivors with a decreased orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) volume through the earthquake disaster were likely to have symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD).[1] As both the ACC and OFC are involved in the processing of anxiety and fear, such structural changes seem to show some similarity with the findings of epidemiological studies on peritraumatic distress (distress at the time of trauma and immediately thereafter). Fear memory becomes excessively consolidated[2] in the development of PTSD and is thought to be enhanced by peritraumatic distress. Indeed, peritraumatic distress is one of the strongest predictors for PTSD.[3] The presence of peritraumatic distress was shown to be a relatively weak indicator of the presence of PTSD, whereas its absence was found to be a strong indicator of the absence of PTSD.[4] Recently, we in our epidemiological study, examined the predictors of PTSD among rescue workers 1 month after the Great East Japan Earthquake as, alongside survivors in the disaster area, they were deemed to be at high risk for developing PTSD. Peritraumatic distress as assessed by the Peritraumatic Distress Inventory (PDI)[5, 6] and watching television for extended period of time predicted PTSD symptoms at 4 months after the earthquake.[7] Moreover, in an online survey conducted by Bui et al.[8] in France, Canada and the United States, within 2 weeks of the earthquake, peritraumatic distress was found to be a predictor of disruptive nocturnal behavior and PTSD symptoms among respondents, and that it significantly mediated a relationship between internet coverage of the disaster and presence of PTSD symptoms. Failure to regulate fear responses to traumatic events could be due to dysfunction in the ACC.[9] As Sekiguchi et al.[1] showed decreased volume of the ACC might reflect genetic and epigenetic vulnerability, and vulnerable individuals might be prone to peritraumatic distress. We suggested that the different types of peritraumatic distress occurring in response to various traumatic events might be important.[7] For example, loss of emotional control and feeling shame might be more important for predicting PTSD than other types of peritraumatic distress in rescue workers after disasters, although helplessness and experiencing physical reactions might be more important in traffic accident survivors. These differences could provide insights into not only effective prevention but also future neurobiological study of PTSD. The current diagnostic criterion A2 for PTSD requires fear, helplessness or horror at the time of the event. Removal of this criterion from the fifth edition of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) has been proposed.[10] This change could be a reasonable one because the positive predictive value of this criterion for PTSD is relatively low, and as many patients with PTSD visit psychiatrists long after a traumatic event, recall bias would be considerable. However, assessment of peritraumatic distress, at least in settings where it could be assessed soon after a traumatic event, could screen out individuals unlikely to develop PTSD as well as contribute to elucidating the pathogenesis of PTSD. A foremost function of the OFC is its involvement in the extinction of conditioned fear.[1] TV and Internet viewing for extended periods after a traumatic event might be harmful to the OFC structure and consequently impair its important functioning for the extinction of fear memory. Thus the results of Sekiguchi et al.'s[1] neuroimaging study coincide with the findings from epidemiological studies, although it remains unclear whether such viewing might constitute traumatic exposure or be a part of ineffective coping. The use of longitudinal neuroimaging data to examine vulnerability factors and acquired sign of PTSD symptoms is of considerable interest for both understanding the pathogenesis of PTSD and developing preventive strategies for it. It is our mission to learn more from this latest tragic event for the future.
  8 in total

1.  Predictors of posttraumatic stress disorder and symptoms in adults: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Emily J Ozer; Suzanne R Best; Tami L Lipsey; Daniel S Weiss
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  The impact of internet coverage of the March 2011 Japan earthquake on sleep and posttraumatic stress symptoms: an international perspective.

Authors:  Eric Bui; Rachel F Rodgers; Christophe Herbert; Debra L Franko; Naomi M Simon; Philippe Birmes; Alain Brunet
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 18.112

3.  Peritraumatic Distress Inventory as a predictor of post-traumatic stress disorder after a severe motor vehicle accident.

Authors:  Daisuke Nishi; Yutaka Matsuoka; Naohiro Yonemoto; Hiroko Noguchi; Yoshiharu Kim; Shigenobu Kanba
Journal:  Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 5.188

Review 4.  Brain imaging in posttraumatic stress disorder.

Authors:  G Villarreal; C Y King
Journal:  Semin Clin Neuropsychiatry       Date:  2001-04

5.  The Peritraumatic Distress Inventory: a proposed measure of PTSD criterion A2.

Authors:  A Brunet; D S Weiss; T J Metzler; S R Best; T C Neylan; C Rogers; J Fagan; C R Marmar
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 18.112

Review 6.  Targeting abnormal neural circuits in mood and anxiety disorders: from the laboratory to the clinic.

Authors:  Kerry J Ressler; Helen S Mayberg
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 24.884

7.  Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Peritraumatic Distress Inventory.

Authors:  Daisuke Nishi; Yutaka Matsuoka; Hiroko Noguchi; Kyoko Sakuma; Naohiro Yonemoto; Tami Yanagita; Masato Homma; Shigenobu Kanba; Yoshiharu Kim
Journal:  Gen Hosp Psychiatry       Date:  2008-10-09       Impact factor: 3.238

8.  Peritraumatic distress, watching television, and posttraumatic stress symptoms among rescue workers after the Great East Japan earthquake.

Authors:  Daisuke Nishi; Yuichi Koido; Naoki Nakaya; Toshimasa Sone; Hiroko Noguchi; Kei Hamazaki; Tomohito Hamazaki; Yutaka Matsuoka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  Incidence and predictors of acute psychological distress and dissociation after motor vehicle collision: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Gemma C Lewis; Timothy F Platts-Mills; Israel Liberzon; Eric Bair; Robert Swor; David Peak; Jeffrey Jones; Niels Rathlev; David Lee; Robert Domeier; Phyllis Hendry; Samuel A McLean
Journal:  J Trauma Dissociation       Date:  2014
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.